* [LARTC] IP Telephony with HTB or IMQ
@ 2003-07-05 12:19 Chijioke Kalu
2003-07-05 12:25 ` Martin Devera
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chijioke Kalu @ 2003-07-05 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Hello all,
Please, does anyone have a setup where HTB or IMQ was used to set aside
uplink/downlink speed for IP Telephony, in other to have clear voice
quality?
K
_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?pageþatures/featuredemail
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] IP Telephony with HTB or IMQ
2003-07-05 12:19 [LARTC] IP Telephony with HTB or IMQ Chijioke Kalu
@ 2003-07-05 12:25 ` Martin Devera
2003-07-05 13:13 ` Chijioke Kalu
2003-07-05 14:04 ` Martin Devera
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Martin Devera @ 2003-07-05 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Don't expect good quality if use local QoS for incomming
data. To have real non-best effort you need to have QoS
on both sides of link - when transmitting packets.
Then yes - HTB should be able to do it using priorities.
But I doubd you can do it if IMQ is in the way.
devik
On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Chijioke Kalu wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Please, does anyone have a setup where HTB or IMQ was used to set aside
> uplink/downlink speed for IP Telephony, in other to have clear voice
> quality?
>
> K
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
> http://join.msn.com/?pageþatures/featuredemail
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] IP Telephony with HTB or IMQ
2003-07-05 12:19 [LARTC] IP Telephony with HTB or IMQ Chijioke Kalu
2003-07-05 12:25 ` Martin Devera
@ 2003-07-05 13:13 ` Chijioke Kalu
2003-07-05 14:04 ` Martin Devera
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chijioke Kalu @ 2003-07-05 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Ok by me, am just desperate, after reading the documentation and tried
differing configs, i was not successful, thus decided to ask experts, I will
wait till monday
thank you
--------------------------------
Sorry I answer some mails if it is under 30seconds or so.
I have no time to write/test such config but I'm sure someone will
do it at least at Monday.
devik
On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Chijioke Kalu wrote:
> Hi Devik,
>
> this could be asking too much, ave just finished compiling kernel with
htb
> patch, and the htb is functioning, do you mind giving me a sample config
I
> can use to achieve this, if it aint too much of a bother.
>
> which setup do u prefer:
>
> Setup A
>
> eth0 - Internet
> eth1 - 20 LAN computers + 1 IP Telephony
>
> Setup B
>
> eth0 - Internet
> eth1 - 20 LAN Computers
> eth2 - 1 IP Telephony
>
> Any choice u make is ok with me, I would just like to see your working
> sample HTB script.
>
> Thanks
>
> K
>
>
> Don't expect good quality if use local QoS for incomming
> data. To have real non-best effort you need to have QoS
> on both sides of link - when transmitting packets.
> Then yes - HTB should be able to do it using priorities.
> But I doubd you can do it if IMQ is in the way.
> devik
>
> On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Chijioke Kalu wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Please, does anyone have a setup where HTB or IMQ was used to set
aside
> > uplink/downlink speed for IP Telephony, in other to have clear voice
> > quality?
> >
> > K
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
> > http://join.msn.com/?pageþatures/featuredemail
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
> >
> >
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
> http://join.msn.com/?pageþatures/junkmail
>
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?pageþatures/junkmail
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] IP Telephony with HTB or IMQ
2003-07-05 12:19 [LARTC] IP Telephony with HTB or IMQ Chijioke Kalu
2003-07-05 12:25 ` Martin Devera
2003-07-05 13:13 ` Chijioke Kalu
@ 2003-07-05 14:04 ` Martin Devera
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Martin Devera @ 2003-07-05 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Yes if you consider transmission over internet. Unfortunately
it is mostly best effort medium and workable VoIP is possible
mainly because of huge BW after user's access line ..
And there is still no compatible Diffserv marking working over
whole Internet.
On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Gerry Creager N5JXS wrote:
> In fact, it's more complicated than Devik offers. QoS should be set,
> AND compatible marking taking place on both sides of the link as stated.
> However, while it's extremely important that both participating
> networks agree on marking and queuing, if the ISPs and carriers are
> congested and do not participate in mark recognition and appropriate
> queuing. it falls back to a best effort, lossy network, regardless of
> what you do at the edges.
>
> gerry
>
> Martin Devera wrote:
> > Don't expect good quality if use local QoS for incomming
> > data. To have real non-best effort you need to have QoS
> > on both sides of link - when transmitting packets.
> > Then yes - HTB should be able to do it using priorities.
> > But I doubd you can do it if IMQ is in the way.
> > devik
> >
> > On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Chijioke Kalu wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Hello all,
> >>
> >>Please, does anyone have a setup where HTB or IMQ was used to set aside
> >>uplink/downlink speed for IP Telephony, in other to have clear voice
> >>quality?
> >>
> >>K
> >>
> >>_________________________________________________________________
> >>Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
> >>http://join.msn.com/?pageþatures/featuredemail
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> >>http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
> --
> Gerry Creager -- gerry.creager@tamu.edu
> Network Engineering -- AATLT, Texas A&M University
> Cell: 979.229.5301 Office: 979.458.4020 FAX: 979.847.8578
> Page: 979.228.0173
> Office: 903A Eller Bldg, TAMU, College Station, TX 77843
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-07-05 14:04 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-07-05 12:19 [LARTC] IP Telephony with HTB or IMQ Chijioke Kalu
2003-07-05 12:25 ` Martin Devera
2003-07-05 13:13 ` Chijioke Kalu
2003-07-05 14:04 ` Martin Devera
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.