All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Klauer <Andreas.Klauer@metamorpher.de>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB for multiple users, good or bad approach?
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003 17:28:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-105975897726738@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-105974896414405@msgid-missing>

Am Friday 01 August 2003 17:39 schrieb Stef Coene:

> > The script I've come up with so far can be found there:
> > http://www.metamorpher.de/files/ipshape.sh

I updated the script.

> Some remarks.  You define a burst on your 1:1 class.  You
> don't need this. 

I bet there are lots of thinks which I don't need.
I'm not familiar with any of these parameters, mainly I'm just
more or less playing around with it. I removed this. 

> And make sure that the sum of the rate of
> child classes = rate of parent class.

I tried that. I noticed that I was wrong at one spot, but
it should fit now, unless there are some rounding errors
(which, hopefully, do not have such a bad impact on things).

> Also, limit all bandwidth too less then your link 
> bandwidth so YOU are the botleneck

How much less would you recommend?
I subbed 5% of link bandwith for now.

> Using different prio's for you htb classes can be tricky. 
> Remove the prio parameters untill you understand what the
> different prio's does.

Yes, now that I read the FAQ on your page, I guess my
prio values were all to high. They're all between 0-7 now,
I hope thats better. If I understand the prio right, I need
them, because I want the interactive connections to take
as much bandwidth as they can get, even if the users are
quite active themselves too... I also raised their rates.
I reckon, though, that these settings still require lots
of tweaking...

> For the quantum problem, see the faq pages on www.docum.org

I read your FAQ before, and I'm sure I still don't understand
it fully. I use some (mostly randomly chosen) quantum values
now, just to make these messages vanish... hopefully they make
any sense...

Thank you very much for your feedback!

--
Andreas Klauer <andreas.klauer@metamorpher.de>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-08-01 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-01 14:41 [LARTC] HTB for multiple users, good or bad approach? Andreas Klauer
2003-08-01 15:39 ` Stef Coene
2003-08-01 17:28 ` Andreas Klauer [this message]
2003-08-02 20:52 ` Stef Coene

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-lartc-105975897726738@msgid-missing \
    --to=andreas.klauer@metamorpher.de \
    --cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.