[LARTC] Sparc problem

[LARTC] Sparc problem

[debritoa]

Hi all, i am using iptables (1.2.8) + iproute on Slackware 8.0 (i386) working 
fine, marking packet based in destination port and network and selecting the 
appropriate route with this marks (i have two links, a 256Kb frame relay and a 
512Kb ADSL). 
Now i change the machine for a Sun Enterprise 250 (Sparc64 with Debian 3.0r1) 
and iptables works fine (the packets are marked) but iproute don't send them 
by the correct interface (only use the default gateway, ppp0). I compile from 
source the kernel (2.4.19, 2.4.20, 2.4.21) with the last patch-o-matic and 
several versions of iproute. 
 
Any idea?. 
 
Thanks in advice 
 


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] Sparc problem

[Martin A. Brown]

Hello there,

 : Now i change the machine for a Sun Enterprise 250 (Sparc64 with Debian
 : 3.0r1)  and iptables works fine (the packets are marked) but iproute
 : don't send them by the correct interface (only use the default gateway,
 : ppp0). I compile from source the kernel (2.4.19, 2.4.20, 2.4.21) with
 : the last patch-o-matic and several versions of iproute.

Sounds to me like the kernel hasn't been compiled with support for
multiple routing tables, or hasn't been compiled with support for routing
with fwmark.

Do you have CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK=y in your kernel config?

-Martin

-- 
Martin A. Brown --- SecurePipe, Inc. --- mabrown@securepipe.com

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] Sparc problem

[debritoa]

El Sáb 09 Ago 2003 21:27, escribió: 
> Hello there, 
> 
>  : Now i change the machine for a Sun Enterprise 250 (Sparc64 with Debian 
>  : 3.0r1)  and iptables works fine (the packets are marked) but iproute 
>  : don't send them by the correct interface (only use the default gateway, 
>  : ppp0). I compile from source the kernel (2.4.19, 2.4.20, 2.4.21) with 
>  : the last patch-o-matic and several versions of iproute. 
> 
> Sounds to me like the kernel hasn't been compiled with support for 
> multiple routing tables, or hasn't been compiled with support for routing 
> with fwmark. 
> 
> Do you have CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK=y in your kernel config? 
> 
> -Martin 
 
Hi, yes CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_FWMARK=y is compiled, but i check and recompile again 
and the problem continue. 
 
Thanks for the answer. :) 
 
--  
 


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/