From: "Curtis V. Schleich" <cvslist@ccaonline.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] QOS problems switching from CBQ to HTB.
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 21:00:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-lartc-106365971619593@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-lartc-106364615002966@msgid-missing>
Trying 4000 right now, I'll try 1500 after I have a chance to see if 4000
makes any difference. I have put new commands and stats (which I will
update periodically over the next few hours) at the
http://wireless.ccaonline.com/lartc/ site. On initial examination it does
not seem to be making any significant difference. I've still got very laggy
ping times, which I did not have when we were using CBQ. During the HTB
research, I did discover that my CBQ setup was probably weird. I had a
class for each user directly off the root, and the total rates FAR exceeded
the available bandwidth. So from what I read it was probably pretty
whacked, but I always seemed to have stable pings under 10ms. These are all
over the map (or graph as the case may be).
Anything else??
Thanks!!
CVS
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stef Coene" <stef.coene@docum.org>
To: "Curtis V. Schleich" <cvslist@ccaonline.com>; <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] QOS problems switching from CBQ to HTB.
> On Monday 15 September 2003 19:14, Curtis V. Schleich wrote:
> > Hello all! So as not to inundate the entire list with a huge email, I
have
> > put together a web page that
> > explains my situation and problem in detail. Here is a quick summary:
> >
> > Internet
> >
> >
> >
> > CCAonline Router (Cisco)
> >
> >
> >
> > (eth0)
> > Master CCAonline AP
> > HTB Bandwidth control
> > (wlan0)
> >
> >
> >
> > =========> > / / / /|\ \ \ \
> > / / / / | \ \ \ \
> > / / / / | \ \ \ \
> > (Lots of Wireless Clients) | \
> > / \
> > / \
> > AP1 AP2
> > / \
> > / \
> > ==== ===> > / /|\ \ / /|\ \
> > / / | \ \ / / | \ \
> > Other Wireless Other Wireless
> > Clients Clients
> Can you try to add "quantum 1500" or maybe 4000 to each class?
>
> Stef
>
> --
> stef.coene@docum.org
> "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
> http://www.docum.org/
> #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-15 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-15 17:14 [LARTC] QOS problems switching from CBQ to HTB Curtis V. Schleich
2003-09-15 18:22 ` Curtis V. Schleich
2003-09-15 20:18 ` Stef Coene
2003-09-15 21:00 ` Curtis V. Schleich [this message]
2003-09-15 21:49 ` Steve Wright
2003-09-15 22:00 ` Curtis V. Schleich
2003-09-16 18:38 ` Stef Coene
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-lartc-106365971619593@msgid-missing \
--to=cvslist@ccaonline.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.