* [LARTC] Layer 7 support for tcng ?
@ 2003-10-05 1:20 Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
2003-10-07 23:06 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira @ 2003-10-05 1:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Yep, thats right. Does it exist somewhere ? Will it ever ?
Currently i use tcng for my bandwidth shaping and i really didnt want to
change to bare tc scripts.
- --
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|PGP Public Key: http://sys49152.net/pubkey.asc |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/f3HHRslfH2ZQjFARArZFAKDmAOz0u0t2M+Rd8UIAah1FouwzLACdHnVW
zALy7xbns/KUZYk+87l8LwI=JIhc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] Layer 7 support for tcng ?
2003-10-05 1:20 [LARTC] Layer 7 support for tcng ? Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
@ 2003-10-07 23:06 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira @ 2003-10-07 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 07 October 2003 21:15, Matthew Strait wrote:
>
> The plan is to port l7-filter to Netfilter. Once this is done, Netfilter
> can put marks on the packets that the pre-existing fw filter can use.
> This approach requires no changes to tcng (or tc). However, it does
> complicate shaping, since two steps are needed rather than one (i.e.
> "mark HTTP as 6; limit 6 to 1mbps", rather than "limit HTTP to 1mbps").
> In the long term, I'd like to have full layer7 support in both QoS and
> Netfilter.
This would be perfect. It doesn't really complicate my setup since i already
use shorewall as firewall and that has support for marking packets already.
Is this anywhere near to being usable ? Will it be 2.6 only ?
- --
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|PGP Public Key: http://sys49152.net/pubkey.asc |
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/g0bjRslfH2ZQjFARAkgzAKCOuq5likCa+mSomisEAmBHw6+xlQCeMcSU
UqsaFBqzpqWMw1v2/QWHi0Y=FWZT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-07 23:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-05 1:20 [LARTC] Layer 7 support for tcng ? Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
2003-10-07 23:06 ` Ricardo Jorge da Fonseca Marques Ferreira
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.