* [LARTC] Excess BW again
@ 2003-10-15 10:42 Tom Olexa
2003-10-16 17:29 ` Stef Coene
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tom Olexa @ 2003-10-15 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Hello there,
I've already posted st similar, but anyway...
can anyone tell me, why the following setup
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb r2q 5
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 512kbit ceil
512kbit tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate
64kbit ceil 512kbit tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:11
htb rate 256kbit ceil 512kbit
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 u32 \
match ip dst 195.28.103.7 flowid 1:10
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 u32 \
match ip dst 195.28.103.5 flowid 1:11
doesn't distribute the excess bw in proportion of allocated bw?
Ratio I expect is 64/256, but I get some 1/2.1 or similar. This
varies according to r2q, but anyway it never gets close to 1/4.
kernel 2.4.21, htb 3.12, but also tested on 2.4.18, htb 3.6 with
similar results...
Can anyone try this setup?
Thanks, Tom
--
Potrebujete vice prostoru pro vase stranky?
Ptejte se na http://sluzby.volny.cz/cs/product/ftp_paid
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [LARTC] Excess BW again
2003-10-15 10:42 [LARTC] Excess BW again Tom Olexa
@ 2003-10-16 17:29 ` Stef Coene
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stef Coene @ 2003-10-16 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Wednesday 15 October 2003 12:42, Tom Olexa wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I've already posted st similar, but anyway...
> can anyone tell me, why the following setup
>
> tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb r2q 5
>
> tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 512kbit ceil
> 512kbit tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate
> 64kbit ceil 512kbit tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:11
> htb rate 256kbit ceil 512kbit
>
> tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 u32 \
> match ip dst 195.28.103.7 flowid 1:10
> tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: protocol ip prio 1 u32 \
> match ip dst 195.28.103.5 flowid 1:11
>
> doesn't distribute the excess bw in proportion of allocated bw?
>
> Ratio I expect is 64/256, but I get some 1/2.1 or similar. This
> varies according to r2q, but anyway it never gets close to 1/4.
>
> kernel 2.4.21, htb 3.12, but also tested on 2.4.18, htb 3.6 with
> similar results...
>
> Can anyone try this setup?
I tried it myself and this is the result (in bytes and the output is not like
it should be):
2.884 KB/s 4.258 KB/s T 7.143 KB/s G 75.41 KB/s 40.38% 40.38%
18.66 KB/s 41.64 KB/s T 60.31 KB/s G 67.82 KB/s 30.95% 36.17%
21.54 KB/s 43.08 KB/s T 64.62 KB/s G 66.75 KB/s 33.33% 35.25%
22.97 KB/s 45.95 KB/s T 68.92 KB/s G 67.30 KB/s 33.33% 34.76%
21.54 KB/s 44.52 KB/s T 66.06 KB/s G 67.05 KB/s 32.61% 34.33%
21.54 KB/s 43.08 KB/s T 64.62 KB/s G 66.64 KB/s 33.33% 34.17%
21.54 KB/s 44.51 KB/s T 66.06 KB/s G 66.56 KB/s 32.61% 33.95%
21.53 KB/s 43.07 KB/s T 64.61 KB/s G 66.32 KB/s 33.33% 33.88%
24.41 KB/s 43.07 KB/s T 67.48 KB/s G 66.45 KB/s 36.17% 34.13%
17.23 KB/s 44.53 KB/s T 61.76 KB/s G 65.98 KB/s 27.91% 33.55%
22.97 KB/s 41.64 KB/s T 64.62 KB/s G 65.85 KB/s 35.56% 33.73%
21.54 KB/s 44.51 KB/s T 66.06 KB/s G 65.87 KB/s 32.61% 33.64%
24.41 KB/s 44.51 KB/s T 68.93 KB/s G 66.11 KB/s 35.42% 33.78%
17.23 KB/s 41.64 KB/s T 58.87 KB/s G 65.59 KB/s 29.27% 33.49%
22.97 KB/s 44.52 KB/s T 67.50 KB/s G 65.72 KB/s 34.04% 33.53%
20.09 KB/s 43.06 KB/s T 63.16 KB/s G 65.56 KB/s 31.82% 33.42%
24.42 KB/s 44.54 KB/s T 68.96 KB/s G 65.76 KB/s 35.42% 33.55%
18.66 KB/s 43.08 KB/s T 61.74 KB/s G 65.53 KB/s 30.23% 33.37%
21.50 KB/s 41.58 KB/s T 63.09 KB/s G 65.40 KB/s 34.09% 33.41%
21.57 KB/s 44.58 KB/s T 66.16 KB/s G 65.44 KB/s 32.61% 33.37%
12.92 KB/s 43.08 KB/s T 56.00 KB/s G 64.99 KB/s 23.08% 32.95%
15.79 KB/s 43.07 KB/s T 58.87 KB/s G 64.71 KB/s 26.83% 32.69%
18.67 KB/s 45.95 KB/s T 64.62 KB/s G 64.71 KB/s 28.89% 32.53%
(10 rate) (11 rate) (10 + 11) (average 10+11) (10/11) (average 10/11)
So the ratio is 32.53%.
Ideally, this should be 64/256 = 25%
Not that bad.
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.openprojects.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-16 17:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-15 10:42 [LARTC] Excess BW again Tom Olexa
2003-10-16 17:29 ` Stef Coene
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.