* [LARTC] Nano and "stateful" protocols?
@ 2003-12-15 11:33 Steen Suder, privat
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Steen Suder, privat @ 2003-12-15 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On some of nano-setups that I run, the users complain (dont they always?
;-) about being unable to use https and sometimes http, tyically in
cases where there is a login (and a corresponding cookie), ICQ and other
systems that not always keeps the initial connection.
They complain about being "thrown off" and the like.
To me it seems to me that the nano-setup and, thus, the routing is to
blame in some way.
To resolve the issue in a quick way I can just tie, say, https to a
given Internetconnection, but I'd rather avoid this because the systems
are made with a bunch of el-cheapo DSLs and they break down every once
in a while and I'd like all DSLs to be used equally.
Can these protocols be "helped" in some way while still keeping the
nano-setup in some form?
--
Mvh. / Best regards,
Steen Suder <http://www.suder.dk/>
ICQ UIN 4133803
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-12-15 11:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-15 11:33 [LARTC] Nano and "stateful" protocols? Steen Suder, privat
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.