Re: [LARTC] Problems with ICQ etc. on nano-setup

["Steen Suder, privat" <steen@suder.dk>]

c0g wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> | Can one "bind" traffic from one LAN-user to the same DSL, effective in
> | lets say 10 minutes from the initial connection?
> | Can some magic with conntrack be put to use?
> 
> You should do Equal Cost Multipath (iproute) + MARK target instead of
> state-based loadbalancing for problematic protocols/sites.
> 
> Create table with default route thru multiple gateways with equalize
> option. Then direct problematic traffic to this table (using routing
> rules and mark matching)

Could I not just apply this method to all traffic?

> Equal Cost Multipath chooses route based on source and destination IP,
> so it bounds client to route, no matter how many connections that client
> made.

Sounds better, actually.

Can you point in the direction of some practical examples?
Perhaps some specific documentation?

> It works for me.
> 
> PS: I assume you have separate network interface in your Linux router
> for each DSL, so you can do SNAT on each interface. If you have them
> connected to one NIC then it not that simple, but may be resolved with
> route realms (but not sure for 100%).

This assumption is correct. The box has a separate, physical interface 
for each DSL and I do simple SNAT for each outgoing (DSL) interface as 
it is now.

-- 
Mvh. / Best regards,
Steen Suder		<http://www.suder.dk/>
ICQ UIN			4133803

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/