* [LARTC] Shaping incoming traffic to limit traffic-bills?
@ 2000-10-25 14:20 Clemens
2000-10-25 16:28 ` bert
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Clemens @ 2000-10-25 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
<PRE>Hi there,
I was just thinking.. When I limit my incoming bandwidth to keep the bills
low (no flat-rate) but the only thing the system does is drop packets, then
I do have to pay for this traffic since it gets dropped on my side. It does
however reduce the amount of outgoing traffic, but are there ways to let
'the other side' know that I can't handle their traffic instead of just
dropping it? I know Cisco (and others?) have some things like RED and
others..
Greetings again,
Clemens Sibon
--
Pettemerstraat 12A T r I p l e
1823 CW Alkmaar T
Tel. +31 (0)72-5129516
fax. +31 (0)72-5129520 Automatisering
www.triple-it.nl "Laat uw Net Werken!"
</PRE>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [LARTC] Shaping incoming traffic to limit traffic-bills?
2000-10-25 14:20 [LARTC] Shaping incoming traffic to limit traffic-bills? Clemens
@ 2000-10-25 16:28 ` bert
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: bert @ 2000-10-25 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
<PRE>On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 04:20:24PM +0200, Clemens Sibon wrote:
><i> Hi there,
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I was just thinking.. When I limit my incoming bandwidth to keep the bills
</I>><i> low (no flat-rate) but the only thing the system does is drop packets, then
</I>><i> I do have to pay for this traffic since it gets dropped on my side. It does
</I>
Yes. But, as the HOWTO explains, TCP/IP responds to lost packets by slowing
down. If people just stream you lots of packets, you do need to pay.
><i> however reduce the amount of outgoing traffic, but are there ways to let
</I>><i> 'the other side' know that I can't handle their traffic instead of just
</I>><i> dropping it? I know Cisco (and others?) have some things like RED and
</I>><i> others..
</I>
RED, ICMP Source Quench, ECN all don't do what you want I'm afraid. Simple
per hop networks just don't work like that. You need to shape upstream to be
really sure.
Regards,
bert hubert
--
PowerDNS Versatile DNS Services
Trilab The Technology People
'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! .. ACK!' - the mating call of the internet
</PRE>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-10-25 16:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-10-25 14:20 [LARTC] Shaping incoming traffic to limit traffic-bills? Clemens
2000-10-25 16:28 ` bert
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.