* [LARTC] Limits of CBQ process under Linux
@ 2000-10-28 8:17 Raffaele
2000-10-28 15:51 ` bert
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Raffaele @ 2000-10-28 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
<PRE>Hi!,
I'm in the process of building a load generator to stress test some networking
equipment for my thesis and I'm wondering how Linux would support doing
egress traffic shaping with on several hundreds(!) virtual ip's defined on
the machine doing the QoS itself.
I have to limit the transmission rate for each virtual ip at, let say, 300Kbit
output
rate.
I currently use CBQ with SFQ queue policy and get good behaviour from the
setup but I only use <10 virtual ip's for now. ( This implies 10 different classes
in CBQ process)
I would like to know if anyone have experience with this kind of setup or if
anyone
does know the limits of the CBQ process with Linux kernels.
Thanks for your help,
Raffaele
--
_______________________________________________________________________________
Raffaele Brancaleoni Email : <A HREF="mailto:s940195@student.ulg.ac.be">s940195@student.ulg.ac.be</A>
Licence en Informatique
Université de Liège - Belgium
_______________________________________________________________________________
</PRE>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [LARTC] Limits of CBQ process under Linux
2000-10-28 8:17 [LARTC] Limits of CBQ process under Linux Raffaele
@ 2000-10-28 15:51 ` bert
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: bert @ 2000-10-28 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
<PRE>On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 10:17:08AM +0200, Raffaele Brancaleoni wrote:
><i> Hi!,
</I>><i> I'm in the process of building a load generator to stress test some networking
</I>><i> equipment for my thesis and I'm wondering how Linux would support doing
</I>><i> egress traffic shaping with on several hundreds(!) virtual ip's defined on
</I>><i> the machine doing the QoS itself.
</I>
You should probably ask this on netdev (<A HREF="mailto:netdev@oss.sgi.com">netdev@oss.sgi.com</A>). However, I've
seen the code and I know the quality of Jamal and Alexeys work, I would
suspect that Linux will not ever be your bottleneck.
Lots of places use hashtables to speed up processing. I got mail from a guy
who did really incredible things with Linux and shaping, also with hundreds
of interfaces.
Regards,
bert hubert
--
PowerDNS Versatile DNS Services
Trilab The Technology People
'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! .. ACK!' - the mating call of the internet
</PRE>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-10-28 15:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-10-28 8:17 [LARTC] Limits of CBQ process under Linux Raffaele
2000-10-28 15:51 ` bert
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.