[LARTC] traffic shaping with 2 class c's

[bert hubert ahu@ds9a.nl]

<PRE>On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 09:08:10AM -0600, Chris Glanzer wrote:
&gt;<i> Hello, I really appreciate this site.  Finally, there is updated info on cbq
</I>&gt;<i> and people with knowledge to back it up - - Thanks
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> Here is my situation,
</I>&gt;<i> I am at a college with a single 512k line for 450 machines.  Our servers and
</I>&gt;<i> fac/staff are on C class x.x.166.x and all students are on C class x.x.167.x
</I>&gt;<i> .  Currently, a few student machines are monopolizing our connection for
</I>&gt;<i> napster and make business related telnet painfully slow (all telnet is
</I>&gt;<i> pointed at the same server off campus.)
</I>
&gt;<i> 1.) I wanted to make sure that it was possible to have 2 C class addresses
</I>&gt;<i> behind IProute2.
</I>
Of course.

&gt;<i> 2.) Would it be possible to limit napster on a per-session basis and also
</I>&gt;<i> have a combined limit?
</I>
Not sure. I think napster *traffic* looks like http. Also, I'm not sure if
you can limit per tcp session.

&gt;<i> 3.) Currently, we are not supporting DCHP and I do not have the resources to
</I>&gt;<i> change the gateways on all machines.  Would that be needed?  The current
</I>&gt;<i> router/gateway is x.x.166.254, it would be possible for me to add an
</I>&gt;<i> additional IP address to it.  This is probably my biggest concern, since I
</I>&gt;<i> want to maintain all my current, real IP's.
</I>
If your router is already Linux, I don't see any problem.

Regards,

bert hubert

-- 
PowerDNS                     Versatile DNS Services  
Trilab                       The Technology People   
'SYN! .. SYN|ACK! .. ACK!' - the mating call of the internet


</PRE>