* [LARTC] Number of algo for bandwidth limiting??
@ 2001-02-22 9:42 Rick
2001-02-23 12:41 ` Rick
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rick @ 2001-02-22 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
<PRE>Besides cbq, are they any other algo already implemented on LINUX??
</PRE>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [LARTC] Number of algo for bandwidth limiting??
2001-02-22 9:42 [LARTC] Number of algo for bandwidth limiting?? Rick
@ 2001-02-23 12:41 ` Rick
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rick @ 2001-02-23 12:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
<PRE>Hi all, i'm sending it because my mailbox was full yesterday and i may have
missed your replies...
So besides CBQ, are there any other algo already implemented on Linux?
If not, does that mean that CBQ being a superset queue must be implemented
first before the rest of the qdisc (like wrr, sfq, etc) can be implemented??
Regards.
</PRE>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-02-23 12:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-02-22 9:42 [LARTC] Number of algo for bandwidth limiting?? Rick
2001-02-23 12:41 ` Rick
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.