* [LARTC] Re: [Linux Diffserv] TC architecture made for Diffserv on linux is wrong !!! why?
@ 2001-06-29 4:35 Werner Almesberger
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Werner Almesberger @ 2001-06-29 4:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
jinho Hwang wrote:
> As this output's sch_dsmark has a FIFO queue, Best effort traffic
> and AF classes traffic is
> combined and does not guaranteed AF classes.
Hmm, so why don't you use CBQ/PRIO and maybe GRED then, i.e. something
that gives AF priority over BE ?
> To solve these demerits, I made ingress marker in linux kernel 2.4.x.
> that is, I take DSCP marking part 's position in input device part .
You don't have to mark in order to classify based on the DS field.
Just use skb->tc_index to convey that information. You can set
skb->tc_index at ingress or at egress (with dsmark).
- Werner
--
_________________________________________________________________________
/ Werner Almesberger, Lausanne, CH wa@almesberger.net /
/_http://icawww.epfl.ch/almesberger/_____________________________________/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2001-06-29 4:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-06-29 4:35 [LARTC] Re: [Linux Diffserv] TC architecture made for Diffserv on linux is wrong !!! why? Werner Almesberger
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.