* [Linux-ia64] Re: Memory leak in 2.5.64
@ 2003-03-12 6:53 David Mosberger
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: David Mosberger @ 2003-03-12 6:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ia64
>>>>> On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:44:14 +1100, Peter Chubb <peter@chubb.wattle.id.au> said:
Peter> Hi David, The way that tasks need to be freed has changed
Peter> since 2.5.61 --- I think we need to do something like the
Peter> attached patch (keep __put_task_struct() in kernel/fork.c;
Peter> have ia64-specific free_task_struct() in
Peter> arch/ia64/kernel/process.c) otherwise the user_struct will
Peter> never have its reference count deleted and so will not be
Peter> freed.
Yes, indeed. The patch basically looks good to me, except it
shouldn't say CONFIG_IA64. The choice of whether or not thread_info
and task_struct should be allocated in one chunk should be a general
platform-choice. There really isn't anything ia64-specific about it.
--david
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-03-12 6:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-12 6:53 [Linux-ia64] Re: Memory leak in 2.5.64 David Mosberger
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.