All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Mosberger <davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-ia64] spin_unlock() problem
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 21:09:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705426@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-105590723705414@msgid-missing>

>>>>> On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 23:51:04 -0500, Jes Sorensen <jes@wildopensource.com> said:

  Jes> Hi, I have been tracing a problem with tty->count hitting an
  Jes> unidenfied state and I am starting to ponder if our current
  Jes> spin_unlock() implementation is sufficient.

  Jes> Currently the spin_unlock() implementation looks like this:

  Jes> #define spin_unlock(x) do { barrier(); ((spinlock_t *) x)->lock
  Jes> = 0;} while (0)

  Jes> barrier() doesn't guarantee memory ordering, in other words, we
  Jes> are not guaranteed that writes have been flushed to physical
  Jes> memory on exit.

Note that "lock" is declared as "volatile", so clearing it will use
"release" semantics.  (Since I know you have a copy of the ia64 linux
kernel book: this is described in detail starting on page 302).

	--david


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-04-07 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-04  4:51 [Linux-ia64] spin_unlock() problem Jes Sorensen
2003-04-04  5:04 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-04-04 14:43 ` Van Maren, Kevin
2003-04-04 14:49 ` Van Maren, Kevin
2003-04-04 15:13 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-04-07 21:09 ` David Mosberger [this message]
2003-04-07 21:14 ` David Mosberger
2003-04-07 22:09 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-04-07 22:18 ` Luck, Tony
2003-04-07 22:58 ` David Mosberger
2003-04-07 23:13 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-04-07 23:30 ` Jim Hull
2003-04-07 23:38 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2003-04-08  0:14 ` David Mosberger
2003-04-08  0:15 ` David Mosberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-105590723705426@msgid-missing \
    --to=davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.