All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UP cmc/cpe polling fix
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 20:49:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-106193126508317@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-106183667010615@msgid-missing>

On Monday 25 August 2003 12:36 pm, Alex Williamson wrote:
>    Oops, I must have only tested the UP polling on a 2.4 kernel.  On
> 2.6, I hit the BUG_ON calling cpu_online(1).  Simply swapping the
> order of the test fixes it.  This should be applied for 2.6 and 2.4.

I applied this for 2.4 as follows:

#### AUTHOR alex.williamson@hp.com
#### COMMENT START
### Comments for ChangeSet
ia64: Correct NR_CPUS/cpu_online test order in CMC/CPE polling

   Oops, I must have only tested the UP polling on a 2.4 kernel.  On
2.6, I hit the BUG_ON calling cpu_online(1).  Simply swapping the
order of the test fixes it.  This should be applied for 2.6 and 2.4.
### Comments for arch/ia64/kernel/mca.c
(ia64_mca_cmc_int_caller): Reorder NR_CPUS/cpu_online test so
	we don't hit BUG_ON in cpu_online(1) in UP kernel.
(ia64_mca_cpe_int_caller): Ditto
#### COMMENT END

# This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project:
# Project Name: Linux kernel tree
# This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or higher.
# This patch includes the following deltas:
#	           ChangeSet	1.1094  -> 1.1095 
#	arch/ia64/kernel/mca.c	1.34    -> 1.35   
#
# The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log
# --------------------------------------------
# 03/08/26	bjorn.helgaas@hp.com	1.1095
# fix order
# --------------------------------------------
#
diff -Nru a/arch/ia64/kernel/mca.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/mca.c
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/mca.c	Tue Aug 26 16:18:24 2003
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/mca.c	Tue Aug 26 16:18:24 2003
@@ -1148,7 +1148,7 @@
 
 	ia64_mca_cmc_int_handler(cpe_irq, arg, ptregs);
 
-	for (++cpuid ; !cpu_online(cpuid) && cpuid < NR_CPUS ; cpuid++);
+	for (++cpuid ; cpuid < NR_CPUS && !cpu_online(cpuid) ; cpuid++);
 		
 	if (cpuid < NR_CPUS) {
 		platform_send_ipi(cpuid, IA64_CMCP_VECTOR, IA64_IPI_DM_INT, 0);
@@ -1226,7 +1226,7 @@
 
 	ia64_mca_cpe_int_handler(cpe_irq, arg, ptregs);
 
-	for (++cpuid ; !cpu_online(cpuid) && cpuid < NR_CPUS ; cpuid++);
+	for (++cpuid ; cpuid < NR_CPUS && !cpu_online(cpuid) ; cpuid++);
 
 	if (cpuid < NR_CPUS) {
 		platform_send_ipi(cpuid, IA64_CPEP_VECTOR, IA64_IPI_DM_INT, 0);


      reply	other threads:[~2003-08-26 20:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-25 18:36 [PATCH] UP cmc/cpe polling fix Alex Williamson
2003-08-26 20:49 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-106193126508317@msgid-missing \
    --to=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.