All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Better MCA recovery on IPF
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 12:03:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-ia64-106812072113117@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-ia64-106724227826901@msgid-missing>

Thanks, all.

I was pleased to hear many thought in active developer's mind.

I want to check some in MCA recovery.
Here is some steps, roughly say:

 - Stop whole system on MCA even if kernel not suffered.
 - Keep working except the suffered application.
 - Keep working, and give a chance to self-rehabilitation for the suffered
   application.

Just now, Linux is making an effort to step up the second from the first.

It also seems there are some key procedures, such as:

 - Specify process/thread(s) must be killed
 - Specify damaged resources (for example, poisoned pages)

To specify affected ones, OS requires:

 - Physical address (and if possible, Virtual address) of the offending
   operation.
 - Interruption must be synchronized.
 - States in registers when interrupted.

Is it wrong?


------

H.Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>



  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-11-06 12:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-27  8:07 [RFC] Better MCA recovery on IPF Hidetoshi Seto
2003-10-27 16:58 ` Matthias Fouquet-Lapar
2003-10-31  5:09 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2003-10-31 17:14 ` Grant Grundler
2003-11-01  6:39 ` Matthias Fouquet-Lapar
2003-11-01  8:38 ` Keith Owens
2003-11-02 13:33 ` Matthias Fouquet-Lapar
2003-11-03 17:09 ` Russ Anderson
2003-11-03 17:37 ` Matthias Fouquet-Lapar
2003-11-03 17:51 ` Alberto Munoz
2003-11-03 17:53 ` Alberto Munoz
2003-11-03 18:23 ` Jack Steiner
2003-11-03 18:42 ` Alberto Munoz
2003-11-03 19:28 ` Jack Steiner
2003-11-03 23:09 ` Alberto Munoz
2003-11-05  4:11 ` Greg Banks
2003-11-05 17:00 ` Luck, Tony
2003-11-05 17:14 ` Alberto Munoz
2003-11-05 17:30 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-11-05 17:37 ` Alberto Munoz
2003-11-06 12:03 ` Hidetoshi Seto [this message]
2003-11-06 14:23 ` Matthias Fouquet-Lapar
2003-11-06 19:09 ` Luck, Tony
2003-11-07  9:58 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2003-11-07 10:52 ` Matthias Fouquet-Lapar
2003-11-08  1:15 ` Luck, Tony
2003-11-08  7:36 ` Matthias Fouquet-Lapar
2003-11-10 10:33 ` Hidetoshi Seto

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=marc-linux-ia64-106812072113117@msgid-missing \
    --to=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.