* Re: UP 1.0.9 on ss5/170
1998-06-13 10:30 UP 1.0.9 on ss5/170 Grant Beattie
@ 1998-06-13 22:32 ` Marc Duponcheel
1998-06-14 3:44 ` Grant Beattie
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marc Duponcheel @ 1998-06-13 22:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ultralinux
> I finally got it running :) i ended up installing it on my sparcclassic
> and then moved the disk to the SS5. I've booted it in single user at
> the moment, here's /proc/cpuinfo
Hey, this is good news actually!
Now, you say that the 'problem' for ss5/170 is merely a setup problem,
right? I guess there must be a fix for that.
As soon as UP 1.1 comes out, I plan to upgrade my ss5/110 to ss5/170 so
I'll probably come back with questions once I start trying this.
You say that if I get things to run on ss5/110 and I simply put the disks
in a ss5/170 that will work?
Greetings,
--- Cisco Systems ---
Marc Duponcheel mduponch@cisco.com tel: +32 2 778 42 40
CATS Team TAC Brussels ---*--- pager: +32 72 53 30 01
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: UP 1.0.9 on ss5/170
1998-06-13 10:30 UP 1.0.9 on ss5/170 Grant Beattie
1998-06-13 22:32 ` Marc Duponcheel
@ 1998-06-14 3:44 ` Grant Beattie
1998-06-14 4:10 ` Jakub Jelinek
1998-06-14 8:08 ` Grant Beattie
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Grant Beattie @ 1998-06-14 3:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ultralinux
Marc Duponcheel writes:
> > I finally got it running :) i ended up installing it on my sparcclassic
> > and then moved the disk to the SS5. I've booted it in single user at
> > the moment, here's /proc/cpuinfo
>
> Hey, this is good news actually!
>
> Now, you say that the 'problem' for ss5/170 is merely a setup problem,
> right? I guess there must be a fix for that.
Yep.
> As soon as UP 1.1 comes out, I plan to upgrade my ss5/110 to ss5/170 so
> I'll probably come back with questions once I start trying this.
>
> You say that if I get things to run on ss5/110 and I simply put the disks
> in a ss5/170 that will work?
It seems that way. Although gcc dies with a sig 11 more often than not,
and /usr/bin/telnet seems to be flaky too :/
I'm not sure if this is a generic problem or only on the ss5/170.
grant
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: UP 1.0.9 on ss5/170
1998-06-13 10:30 UP 1.0.9 on ss5/170 Grant Beattie
1998-06-13 22:32 ` Marc Duponcheel
1998-06-14 3:44 ` Grant Beattie
@ 1998-06-14 4:10 ` Jakub Jelinek
1998-06-14 8:08 ` Grant Beattie
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 1998-06-14 4:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ultralinux
> > As soon as UP 1.1 comes out, I plan to upgrade my ss5/110 to ss5/170 so
> > I'll probably come back with questions once I start trying this.
> >
> > You say that if I get things to run on ss5/110 and I simply put the disks
> > in a ss5/170 that will work?
>
> It seems that way. Although gcc dies with a sig 11 more often than not,
> and /usr/bin/telnet seems to be flaky too :/
>
> I'm not sure if this is a generic problem or only on the ss5/170.
That's exactly the behaviour like TurboSPARC port currently works (and has
for at least half a year).
It is flaky, it is probably some cache flushing issue or whatever.
If you'd have time and want to do that, I could tell you how you can debug
it and what to look at.
Cheers,
Jakub
___________________________________________________________________
Jakub Jelinek | jj@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz | http://sunsite.mff.cuni.cz
Administrator of SunSITE Czech Republic, MFF, Charles University
___________________________________________________________________
Ultralinux - first 64bit OS to take full power of the UltraSparc
Linux version 2.1.105 on a sparc64 machine (498.80 BogoMips).
___________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: UP 1.0.9 on ss5/170
1998-06-13 10:30 UP 1.0.9 on ss5/170 Grant Beattie
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
1998-06-14 4:10 ` Jakub Jelinek
@ 1998-06-14 8:08 ` Grant Beattie
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Grant Beattie @ 1998-06-14 8:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ultralinux
Jakub Jelinek writes:
> > It seems that way. Although gcc dies with a sig 11 more often than not,
> > and /usr/bin/telnet seems to be flaky too :/
> >
> > I'm not sure if this is a generic problem or only on the ss5/170.
>
> That's exactly the behaviour like TurboSPARC port currently works (and has
> for at least half a year).
> It is flaky, it is probably some cache flushing issue or whatever.
> If you'd have time and want to do that, I could tell you how you can debug
> it and what to look at.
Sure, I'd be glad to help out. email me what you'd like me to check out
and I'll see what I can do.
grant.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread