From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: syscall.tbl refactoring seems to have dropped definition of __NR_newfstatat on arm64 and riscv (64-bit) at least
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 13:47:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mvmh6c4fors.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sevoqy7v.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (Florian Weimer's message of "Thu, 01 Aug 2024 13:28:04 +0200")
On Aug 01 2024, Florian Weimer wrote:
> It's been repported that __NR_newfstatat has gone missing from the UAPI
> headers.
It has actually been wrongly renamed to __NR_fstatat.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: syscall.tbl refactoring seems to have dropped definition of __NR_newfstatat on arm64 and riscv (64-bit) at least
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2024 13:47:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mvmh6c4fors.fsf@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sevoqy7v.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (Florian Weimer's message of "Thu, 01 Aug 2024 13:28:04 +0200")
On Aug 01 2024, Florian Weimer wrote:
> It's been repported that __NR_newfstatat has gone missing from the UAPI
> headers.
It has actually been wrongly renamed to __NR_fstatat.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-01 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-01 11:28 syscall.tbl refactoring seems to have dropped definition of __NR_newfstatat on arm64 and riscv (64-bit) at least Florian Weimer
2024-08-01 11:28 ` Florian Weimer
2024-08-01 11:47 ` Andreas Schwab [this message]
2024-08-01 11:47 ` Andreas Schwab
2024-08-01 12:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-08-01 12:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mvmh6c4fors.fsf@suse.de \
--to=schwab@suse.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.