* mplayer2 : focus deficiency?
@ 2016-02-10 11:02 Belal, Awais
2016-02-10 12:54 ` Gary Thomas
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Belal, Awais @ 2016-02-10 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Hi,
The version of mplayer2 available in meta-oe is almost 2.5 years old while there seems to be active development around it. Is there a reason OE never moved to a newer version?
The mplayer team officially releases tarballs from its website https://www.mplayerhq.hu/design7/dload.html while they also provide svn access through svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/mplayer/trunk. I believe it would be a good idea to move to one of these sources (I would prefer tar downloads myself) and use a newer more robust (probably) version of mplayer2.
I will be working on a new recipe to cater this if there are no objections but I would really like to have some feedback before I do so.
BR,
Awais
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: mplayer2 : focus deficiency?
2016-02-10 11:02 mplayer2 : focus deficiency? Belal, Awais
@ 2016-02-10 12:54 ` Gary Thomas
2016-02-22 8:51 ` Belal, Awais
2016-02-10 13:10 ` Martin Jansa
2016-02-13 8:51 ` Koen Kooi
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gary Thomas @ 2016-02-10 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
On 2016-02-10 12:02, Belal, Awais wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The version of mplayer2 available in meta-oe is almost 2.5 years old while there seems to be active development around it. Is there a reason OE never moved to a newer version?
>
> The mplayer team officially releases tarballs from its website https://www.mplayerhq.hu/design7/dload.html while they also provide svn access through svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/mplayer/trunk. I believe it would be a good idea to move to one of these sources (I would prefer tar downloads myself) and use a newer more robust (probably) version of mplayer2.
>
I didn't think to look anywhere other than their git tree which seems
to be abandoned (the version we are using is the latest out there)
> I will be working on a new recipe to cater this if there are no objections but I would really like to have some feedback before I do so.
I've been trying to fix up what we have now that OE-core has
abandoned libav, replacing it with a newer ffmpeg. Maybe I'll
give this a go myself if you'd like to wait a short while (perhaps
by tomorrow)?
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: mplayer2 : focus deficiency?
2016-02-10 11:02 mplayer2 : focus deficiency? Belal, Awais
2016-02-10 12:54 ` Gary Thomas
@ 2016-02-10 13:10 ` Martin Jansa
2016-02-13 8:51 ` Koen Kooi
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Martin Jansa @ 2016-02-10 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1152 bytes --]
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:02:30AM +0000, Belal, Awais wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The version of mplayer2 available in meta-oe is almost 2.5 years old while there seems to be active development around it. Is there a reason OE never moved to a newer version?
>
> The mplayer team officially releases tarballs from its website https://www.mplayerhq.hu/design7/dload.html while they also provide svn access through svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/mplayer/trunk. I believe it would be a good idea to move to one of these sources (I would prefer tar downloads myself) and use a newer more robust (probably) version of mplayer2.
That's what was used in mplayer.bb (without 2 in oe-classic days),
mplayer2 was more active and better alternative at that time so only
mplayer2 was migrated from oe-classic.
> I will be working on a new recipe to cater this if there are no objections but I would really like to have some feedback before I do so.
If mplayer(1) is alive again, then I would accept patch replacing
mplayer2 or you can restore it as mplayer.bb and keep both alternatives.
Regards,
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: mplayer2 : focus deficiency?
2016-02-10 11:02 mplayer2 : focus deficiency? Belal, Awais
2016-02-10 12:54 ` Gary Thomas
2016-02-10 13:10 ` Martin Jansa
@ 2016-02-13 8:51 ` Koen Kooi
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Koen Kooi @ 2016-02-13 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Op 10-02-16 om 12:02 schreef Belal, Awais:
> Hi,
>
> The version of mplayer2 available in meta-oe is almost 2.5 years old
> while there seems to be active development around it. Is there a reason
> OE never moved to a newer version?
Personally, I stopped caring about mplayer2 when they removed the
dumb-framebuffer support. Which is what I needed it for. If the original
mplayer supports that, fine.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iD8DBQFWvu6PMkyGM64RGpERAowbAJ0b5+GxkYOg0GWgriATc9NT3EHl2QCfQpTg
h5tpFgKPUATbsnuvqb4FDRY=
=VAWH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: mplayer2 : focus deficiency?
2016-02-10 12:54 ` Gary Thomas
@ 2016-02-22 8:51 ` Belal, Awais
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Belal, Awais @ 2016-02-22 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gary@mlbassoc.com; +Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Hi Gary,
Anything here?
BR,
Awais
________________________________________
From: openembedded-devel-bounces@lists.openembedded.org [openembedded-devel-bounces@lists.openembedded.org] on behalf of Gary Thomas []
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 5:54 PM
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [oe] mplayer2 : focus deficiency?
On 2016-02-10 12:02, Belal, Awais wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The version of mplayer2 available in meta-oe is almost 2.5 years old while there seems to be active development around it. Is there a reason OE never moved to a newer version?
>
> The mplayer team officially releases tarballs from its website https://www.mplayerhq.hu/design7/dload.html while they also provide svn access through svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/mplayer/trunk. I believe it would be a good idea to move to one of these sources (I would prefer tar downloads myself) and use a newer more robust (probably) version of mplayer2.
>
I didn't think to look anywhere other than their git tree which seems
to be abandoned (the version we are using is the latest out there)
> I will be working on a new recipe to cater this if there are no objections but I would really like to have some feedback before I do so.
I've been trying to fix up what we have now that OE-core has
abandoned libav, replacing it with a newer ffmpeg. Maybe I'll
give this a go myself if you'd like to wait a short while (perhaps
by tomorrow)?
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-22 8:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-02-10 11:02 mplayer2 : focus deficiency? Belal, Awais
2016-02-10 12:54 ` Gary Thomas
2016-02-22 8:51 ` Belal, Awais
2016-02-10 13:10 ` Martin Jansa
2016-02-13 8:51 ` Koen Kooi
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.