From: PFC <lists@boutiquenumerique.com>
To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>,
David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com>,
ReiserFS List <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: reiser4 performance
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 09:41:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.su8cz5y5th1vuj@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e692861c050808175818078a30@mail.gmail.com>
> So for most webserver cases, FS speed doesn't matter. For the few
> cases where it does, locality is usually fairly good... so who cares
> if the new FS is 2x faster, when it is still 200x slower than ram. Add
> ram.
But Reiser4 helps stuffing more files into the cache.
It also helps when many people concurrently download (or upload) large
files. Its streaming performances are very good.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-09 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-08 10:32 reiser4 performance Hemiplegic Menehune
2005-08-08 10:51 ` PFC
2005-08-08 11:09 ` Raymond A. Meijer
2005-08-08 13:38 ` Ingo Bormuth
2005-08-08 16:44 ` PFC
2005-08-08 19:53 ` David Masover
2005-08-08 20:30 ` michael chang
2005-08-08 20:34 ` michael chang
2005-08-08 20:40 ` Bedros Hanounik
2005-08-08 20:58 ` michael chang
2005-08-08 21:41 ` Ingo Bormuth
2005-08-08 20:51 ` Funding [Was:reiser4 performance] Pysiak Satriani
2005-08-08 19:56 ` reiser4 performance David Masover
2005-08-08 22:06 ` Hans Reiser
2005-08-09 0:02 ` David Masover
2005-08-09 0:16 ` michael chang
2005-08-09 1:02 ` David Masover
2005-08-09 17:52 ` michael chang
2005-08-09 20:19 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-08-10 1:23 ` David Masover
2005-08-10 21:33 ` Hans Reiser
2005-08-08 18:09 ` Hans Reiser
2005-08-08 18:10 ` Hans Reiser
2005-08-08 23:13 ` Gregory Maxwell
2005-08-08 23:30 ` Hans Reiser
2005-08-09 0:20 ` David Masover
2005-08-09 0:58 ` Gregory Maxwell
2005-08-09 1:33 ` David Masover
2005-08-09 1:55 ` Gregory Maxwell
2005-08-11 18:49 ` Hans Reiser
2005-08-11 19:00 ` PFC
2005-08-11 21:29 ` Gregory Maxwell
2005-08-09 2:03 ` Gregory Maxwell
2005-08-10 1:34 ` David Masover
2005-08-10 1:51 ` Pat Double
2005-08-10 2:11 ` David Masover
2005-08-10 2:19 ` Pat Double
2005-08-10 2:32 ` David Masover
2005-08-10 2:49 ` Pat Double
2005-08-09 7:41 ` PFC [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-08-08 20:57 Pysiak Satriani
2005-08-08 22:42 ` Hans Reiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=op.su8cz5y5th1vuj@localhost \
--to=lists@boutiquenumerique.com \
--cc=gmaxwell@gmail.com \
--cc=ninja@slaphack.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.