From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Crispin Cowan <crispin@crispincowan.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
LSM ML <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
apparmor-dev <apparmor-dev@forge.novell.com>
Subject: Re: AppArmor Security Goal
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:04:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <p73tzntzuak.fsf@bingen.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <473380AD.5070801@crispincowan.com> (Crispin Cowan's message of "Thu\, 08 Nov 2007 13\:33\:33 -0800")
Crispin Cowan <crispin@crispincowan.com> writes:
The document should be a good base for a merge.
> * A confined process can operate on a file descriptor passed to it
> by an unconfined process, even if it manipulates a file not in the
> confined process's profile. To block this attack, confine the
> process that passed the file descriptor.
That is the only thing that tripped me up a bit while reading the document.
Can you expand a bit on the reasons why the fd is not rechecked in
the context of the target process? Best do it in a new version of the
document.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-10 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-08 21:33 AppArmor Security Goal Crispin Cowan
2007-11-10 21:04 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-11-10 21:24 ` Crispin Cowan
2007-11-11 3:23 ` John Johansen
2007-11-10 21:28 ` david
2007-11-11 3:36 ` John Johansen
2007-11-10 22:04 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2007-11-10 22:11 ` Crispin Cowan
2007-11-10 22:24 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2007-11-10 22:41 ` Crispin Cowan
2007-11-10 22:57 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-10 23:14 ` Crispin Cowan
2007-11-10 23:54 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-10 23:25 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2007-11-10 23:52 ` david
2007-11-10 23:47 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2007-11-10 23:56 ` Alan Cox
2007-11-11 1:27 ` david
2007-11-11 3:59 ` John Johansen
2007-11-12 23:58 ` Crispin Cowan
2007-11-11 4:17 ` John Johansen
2007-11-11 4:50 ` david
2007-11-13 0:13 ` Crispin Cowan
2007-11-11 7:02 ` Rogelio M. Serrano Jr.
2007-11-12 23:50 ` Crispin Cowan
2007-11-13 1:20 ` John Johansen
2007-11-11 2:17 ` Casey Schaufler
2007-11-11 3:55 ` John Johansen
2007-11-13 0:10 ` Joshua Brindle
2007-11-13 4:58 ` Casey Schaufler
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-11-11 8:16 Rob Meijer
[not found] <9nngC-6iQ-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <9o6Qq-2Hk-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <9o6Qq-2Hk-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <9o706-2Xe-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <9o7jp-3lE-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <9o7Wg-4sT-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <9of7j-7ej-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2007-11-12 18:43 ` Bodo Eggert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=p73tzntzuak.fsf@bingen.suse.de \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=apparmor-dev@forge.novell.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=crispin@crispincowan.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.