From: Thorny <thorntreehome@gmail.com>
To: linux-laptop@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel strange behaviour
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:09:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2008.10.13.12.09.22.710387@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 654849.23414.qm@web53203.mail.re2.yahoo.com
On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:55:14 -0700, Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
> --- On Sun, 10/12/08, Thorny <thorntreehome@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Thorny <thorntreehome@gmail.com> Subject: Re: kernel strange
>> behaviour To: linux-laptop@vger.kernel.org
>> Date: Sunday, October 12, 2008, 12:48 PM [edit]
>
>
>> What are those "few things" you are
>> "missing", since other people with the same D520 are using the stock
>> kernel, I can't think what would be
>> missing? What happened when you tried to install with the stock kernel?
>>
> First of all I've always compiled my own kernel and optimized the
> configuration. If you have a look into the stock kernel config you'll see
> why. I didn't install kubuntu kernel at all. In the debian one I see CPU =
> Pentuim M, but myone is Core 2, so I think it's enough reason to explain
> why I preffer custom kernel. In my 9-10 years of linux expereience I've
> been using always custom and it was always good choice. In second place I
> have a uvcvideo webcam the drivers are included in the 2.6.26. The third
> reason is that I have a VMplayer and didn't manage to build it with the on
> stock kernel .... and finally I'm following the advice of the kernel
> people to install the latest and to test just for to bug them with my
> questions ;-)
>
> If you do not have kernel experience I doubt you know more than me and
> you'll be able to help me. If it would be an easy question most probably I
> should have fixed it myself
>
> thanks and regards
You are welcome. A custom kernel is a good choice except in the instance
in which it doesn't work, like now.
What I don't understand is, if you are "following the advice of the kernel
people", why are you asking for advice here rather than on a kernel
developers list. It seems like you would get better advice from more
knowledgeable people that way.
I agree with your assessment, I doubt I know as much as you about it and I
certainly don't have any hardware that requires such a new kernel version.
Regards to you also Emanoil.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-13 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-10 9:42 kernel strange behaviour Emanoil Kotsev
2008-10-11 6:03 ` Jim Carter
2008-10-11 14:53 ` Thorny
2008-10-11 17:16 ` Emanoil Kotsev
2008-10-12 10:48 ` Thorny
2008-10-13 5:55 ` Emanoil Kotsev
2008-10-13 12:09 ` Thorny [this message]
2008-10-13 22:05 ` Emanoil Kotsev
2008-10-14 10:43 ` Thorny
2008-10-14 22:59 ` Emanoil Kotsev
2008-10-15 22:48 ` Emanoil Kotsev
2008-10-13 17:09 ` Thorny
2008-10-13 21:11 ` Emanoil Kotsev
2008-10-14 10:43 ` Thorny
2008-10-14 22:55 ` Emanoil Kotsev
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-10-11 10:06 Emanoil Kotsev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=pan.2008.10.13.12.09.22.710387@gmail.com \
--to=thorntreehome@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-laptop@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.