From: "Holger Hoffstätte" <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: iterate over unused chunk space in FITRIM
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 11:15:24 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan.2015.06.04.11.15.24@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1433342874-7099-2-git-send-email-jeffm@suse.com
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 10:47:52 -0400, jeffm wrote:
> This patch iterates over the unused chunk space and discards any regions
> that are unallocated, regardless of whether they were ever used. This is
> a change for btrfs but is consistent with other file systems.
> ..
[snip]
This just gave me:
fs/btrfs/volumes.c: In function 'btrfs_shrink_device':
fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4148:31: warning: passing argument 1 of 'contains_pending_extent' from incompatible pointer type
if (contains_pending_extent(trans, device, &start, len)) {
^
fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1092:12: note: expected 'struct btrfs_transaction *' but argument is of type 'struct btrfs_trans_handle *'
static int contains_pending_extent(struct btrfs_transaction *transaction,
^
because it changes the signature of contains_pending_extent():
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 174f5e1..7fdde31 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -1051,15 +1051,18 @@ out:
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int contains_pending_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
> +static int contains_pending_extent(struct btrfs_transaction *transaction,
> struct btrfs_device *device,
> u64 *start, u64 len)
which conflicts with Filipe's patch on Tuesday called "Btrfs: check pending chunks
when shrinking fs to avoid corruption":
+ if (contains_pending_extent(trans, device, &start, len)) {
since trans (returned from start_transaction()) is a handle, not the tx itself.
ISTM that it should now pass trans->transaction instead..or something.
-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-04 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-03 14:47 [PATCH v3] btrfs: fix automatic blockgroup remove + discard jeffm
2015-06-03 14:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] btrfs: iterate over unused chunk space in FITRIM jeffm
2015-06-04 11:15 ` Holger Hoffstätte [this message]
2015-06-05 13:08 ` Jeff Mahoney
2015-06-05 14:38 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2015-06-03 14:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] btrfs: explictly delete unused block groups in close_ctree and ro-remount jeffm
2015-06-03 14:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] btrfs: add missing discards when unpinning extents with -o discard jeffm
2015-06-08 14:12 ` Filipe David Manana
2015-06-09 20:48 ` Jeff Mahoney
2015-06-10 0:05 ` Jeff Mahoney
2015-06-10 22:52 ` Jeff Mahoney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=pan.2015.06.04.11.15.24@googlemail.com \
--to=holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.