* IPC_RMID should not block the key
@ 2000-12-19 18:28 Christoph Rohland
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Christoph Rohland @ 2000-12-19 18:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Cox; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Hi Alan,
here is a patch against 2.2.18 to resemble the same behaviour for
2.2 as we have in 2.4. This is what everybody else does and the 2.2
behaviour leads to some really bad situations.
Greetings
Christoph
diff -uNr 2.2.18/ipc/shm.c c/ipc/shm.c
--- 2.2.18/ipc/shm.c Wed Jun 7 23:26:44 2000
+++ c/ipc/shm.c Tue Dec 19 19:10:12 2000
@@ -340,6 +340,8 @@
shp->u.shm_perm.mode |= SHM_DEST;
if (shp->u.shm_nattch <= 0)
killseg (id);
+ /* Do not find it any more */
+ shp->u.shm_perm.key = IPC_PRIVATE;
break;
}
err = -EPERM;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2000-12-19 18:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-12-19 18:28 IPC_RMID should not block the key Christoph Rohland
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.