[uml-devel] Problems applying patches to 2.6.12-rc5-mm1

[uml-devel] Problems applying patches to 2.6.12-rc5-mm1

[Anthony Brock]

I'm running into a problem applying the latest tarball from Jeff's tree. I've downloaded the linux-2.6.12-rc5 source and applied the -mm1 patches with:

# bzip2 -dc ../2.6.12-rc5-mm1.bz2 |patch -p1

This applied without issue. I then tried to apply the tarball from Jeff's patches:

# quilt push -a
Applying patch set-tsk-need-resched
patching file arch/um/kernel/process_kern.c

< output trimmed >

Applying patch os-main
patching file arch/um/kernel/Makefile
patching file arch/um/kernel/main.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
File arch/um/kernel/main.c is not empty after patch, as expected
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file arch/um/kernel/main.c
patching file arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c
patching file arch/um/os-Linux/Makefile
patching file arch/um/os-Linux/main.c
Patch os-main does not apply (enforce with -f)
# 

Any ideas?

Tony



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Problems applying patches to 2.6.12-rc5-mm1

[Jeff Dike]

On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 11:03:23AM -0700, Anthony Brock wrote:
> patching file arch/um/kernel/main.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
> File arch/um/kernel/main.c is not empty after patch, as expected
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file arch/um/kernel/main.c
> patching file arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c
> patching file arch/um/os-Linux/Makefile
> patching file arch/um/os-Linux/main.c
> Patch os-main does not apply (enforce with -f)
> # 

Grab the patches again.  I may have synced the patches when I didn't have
them all pushed.  I just synced again, and everything is applied, so these
should work.

Then get a stack trace from that.  I promise not to change too much in the
next day or two, so your line numbers should still match mine.

				Jeff


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Problems applying patches to 2.6.12-rc5-mm1

[Anthony Brock]

As an additional FYI, I just refreshed my copy of the tarball. I now stops during compile:

# make ARCH=um && make modules ARCH=um
  CHK     include/linux/version.h
  UPD     include/linux/version.h
  SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-um

< output trimmed >

  SYMLINK arch/um/sys-i386/semaphore.c
  CC      arch/um/sys-i386/semaphore.o
  CC      arch/um/sys-i386/signal.o
  CC      arch/um/sys-i386/sigcontext.o
  AS      arch/um/sys-i386/stub.o
  CC      arch/um/sys-i386/stub_segv.o
fixdep: arch/um/sys-i386/.stub_segv.o.d: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** [arch/um/sys-i386/stub_segv.o] Error 2
make: *** [arch/um/sys-i386] Error 2
# 

Tony

>>> Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> 05/31/05 03:00PM >>>
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 11:03:23AM -0700, Anthony Brock wrote:
> patching file arch/um/kernel/main.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
> File arch/um/kernel/main.c is not empty after patch, as expected
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file arch/um/kernel/main.c
> patching file arch/um/kernel/um_arch.c
> patching file arch/um/os-Linux/Makefile
> patching file arch/um/os-Linux/main.c
> Patch os-main does not apply (enforce with -f)
> # 

Grab the patches again.  I may have synced the patches when I didn't have
them all pushed.  I just synced again, and everything is applied, so these
should work.

Then get a stack trace from that.  I promise not to change too much in the
next day or two, so your line numbers should still match mine.

				Jeff



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Problems applying patches to 2.6.12-rc5-mm1

[Blaisorblade]

On Wednesday 01 June 2005 01:01, Anthony Brock wrote:
> As an additional FYI, I just refreshed my copy of the tarball. I now stops
> during compile:
>
> # make ARCH=um && make modules ARCH=um
>   CHK     include/linux/version.h
>   UPD     include/linux/version.h
>   SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-um
>
> < output trimmed >
>
>   SYMLINK arch/um/sys-i386/semaphore.c
>   CC      arch/um/sys-i386/semaphore.o
>   CC      arch/um/sys-i386/signal.o
>   CC      arch/um/sys-i386/sigcontext.o
>   AS      arch/um/sys-i386/stub.o
>   CC      arch/um/sys-i386/stub_segv.o
> fixdep: arch/um/sys-i386/.stub_segv.o.d: No such file or directory
> make[1]: *** [arch/um/sys-i386/stub_segv.o] Error 2
> make: *** [arch/um/sys-i386] Error 2
remove av-skas0 and retry, that's the more likely culprit at a very quick 
glance.

-- 
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade

	

	
		
___________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB 
http://mail.yahoo.it



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Problems applying patches to 2.6.12-rc5-mm1

[Anthony Brock]

Blaisor,

Thanks! I've removed this patch while leaving everything else applied. The kernel now compiles. I'm running it and will report back once I have a backtrace. *sigh*

Tony


>>> Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> 05/31/05 04:32PM >>>
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 01:01, Anthony Brock wrote:
> As an additional FYI, I just refreshed my copy of the tarball. I now stops
> during compile:
>
> # make ARCH=um && make modules ARCH=um
>   CHK     include/linux/version.h
>   UPD     include/linux/version.h
>   SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-um
>
> < output trimmed >
>
>   SYMLINK arch/um/sys-i386/semaphore.c
>   CC      arch/um/sys-i386/semaphore.o
>   CC      arch/um/sys-i386/signal.o
>   CC      arch/um/sys-i386/sigcontext.o
>   AS      arch/um/sys-i386/stub.o
>   CC      arch/um/sys-i386/stub_segv.o
> fixdep: arch/um/sys-i386/.stub_segv.o.d: No such file or directory
> make[1]: *** [arch/um/sys-i386/stub_segv.o] Error 2
> make: *** [arch/um/sys-i386] Error 2
remove av-skas0 and retry, that's the more likely culprit at a very quick 
glance.

-- 
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade 

	

	
		
___________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB 
http://mail.yahoo.it



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Problems applying patches to 2.6.12-rc5-mm1

[Jeff Dike]

Anthony_Brock@ous.edu said:
> fixdep: arch/um/sys-i386/.stub_segv.o.d: No such file or directory
> make[1]: *** [arch/um/sys-i386/stub_segv.o] Error 2
> make: *** [arch/um/sys-i386] Error 2

I don't understand this at all, but rerunning the build gives me a good UML.

				Jeff



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Problems applying patches to 2.6.12-rc5-mm1

[Anthony Brock]

I'm now seeing new messages appear on the console with the 2.6.12-rc5-mm1 kernel that I haven't seen with the 2.6.11.x series kernels:

sigio_handler: os_waiting_for_events: poll returned -1, errno = 4

I'm not certain if this is a new issue or just a result of running the UML under gdb. Ideas?

Tony


>>> "Anthony Brock" <Anthony_Brock@ous.edu> 06/01/05 10:06AM >>>
Blaisor,

Thanks! I've removed this patch while leaving everything else applied. The kernel now compiles. I'm running it and will report back once I have a backtrace. *sigh*

Tony


>>> Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> 05/31/05 04:32PM >>>
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 01:01, Anthony Brock wrote:
> As an additional FYI, I just refreshed my copy of the tarball. I now stops
> during compile:
>
> # make ARCH=um && make modules ARCH=um
>   CHK     include/linux/version.h
>   UPD     include/linux/version.h
>   SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-um
>
> < output trimmed >
>
>   SYMLINK arch/um/sys-i386/semaphore.c
>   CC      arch/um/sys-i386/semaphore.o
>   CC      arch/um/sys-i386/signal.o
>   CC      arch/um/sys-i386/sigcontext.o
>   AS      arch/um/sys-i386/stub.o
>   CC      arch/um/sys-i386/stub_segv.o
> fixdep: arch/um/sys-i386/.stub_segv.o.d: No such file or directory
> make[1]: *** [arch/um/sys-i386/stub_segv.o] Error 2
> make: *** [arch/um/sys-i386] Error 2
remove av-skas0 and retry, that's the more likely culprit at a very quick 
glance.

-- 
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade 

	

	
		
___________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB 
http://mail.yahoo.it 



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005 
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Problems applying patches to 2.6.12-rc5-mm1

[Jeff Dike]

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 11:01:33AM -0700, Anthony Brock wrote:
> I'm now seeing new messages appear on the console with the
> 2.6.12-rc5-mm1 kernel that I haven't seen with the 2.6.11.x series
> kernels: 
> 
> sigio_handler: os_waiting_for_events: poll returned -1, errno = 4

That's EINTR, should be harmless.  I just need to check for that and
retry the poll.

				Jeff


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

RE: [uml-devel] Problems applying patches to 2.6.12-rc5-mm1

[Anthony Brock]

The instance still hasn't crashed. However, I'm now seeing the following in
the process table:

# ps -eo user,pid,ppid,%cpu,%mem,vsz,rss,tty,stat,start,time,cmd |grep -v
grep |egrep 'PID|bindsec' |cut -b 1-131
USER       PID  PPID %CPU %MEM   VSZ  RSS TT       STAT  STARTED     TIME
CMD
bindsec  12531     1  0.0  0.0  2676 1376 ?        Ss   13:20:04 00:00:00
SCREEN -d -m -t bind2 -S bind2 /var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.1
bindsec  12532 12531  0.4  2.3 67516 49572 pts/1   Ss+  13:20:04 00:01:38
/var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.12-rc5-mm1-00-32bit umid=bind2 h
bindsec  12546 12532  0.0  2.3 67516 49572 pts/1   S+   13:20:04 00:00:01
/var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.12-rc5-mm1-00-32bit umid=bind2 h
bindsec  12547 12532  0.0  2.3 67516 49572 pts/1   S+   13:20:04 00:00:00
/var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.12-rc5-mm1-00-32bit umid=bind2 h
bindsec  12548 12532  0.0  0.0   256  104 pts/1    T+   13:20:04 00:00:00
bindsec  15460 12532  0.0  0.0   612  572 pts/1    T+   13:20:48 00:00:00  0
?   A    ??@ ?  ?   ?   ?   u3
bindsec  15465 12532  0.0  0.0   600  508 pts/1    T+   13:20:48 00:00:00
?@ ?  ?   ?   ?   .>    ?@?   A    ??@ ?  ?   ?   ?    )
bindsec  15497 12532  0.0  0.0  1716  200 pts/1    T+   13:20:49 00:00:00  0
?   ?   ?   ?)   P @?   A    ? @ ?  ?   ?   ?   8)
bindsec  15528 12532  0.0  0.1  3816 3448 pts/1    T+   13:20:49 00:00:04  ?
?   ?   ?   R(   ?(@?   [     (@
bindsec  16592 12532  0.0  0.0  1380  164 pts/1    T+   13:21:06 00:00:00  ?
?   ?   ?   I(   ???    A    A?@ ?  ?   ?   ?   .6
bindsec  16636 12532  0.0  0.0  1416 1416 pts/1    T+   13:21:06 00:00:00
bindsec  16638 12532  0.0  0.0   704   64 pts/1    T+   13:21:06 00:00:00  ?
?   ?   ?   ?<   D?@?   A    a?@    ?   ?   ?   ?<
bindsec  17390 12532  0.0  0.0   488  488 pts/1    T+   13:21:19 00:00:00
bindsec  21243 12532  0.0  0.0  1368 1368 pts/1    T+   18:20:07 00:00:00
#

Why do several of these processes have a process state of 'T+' (traced or
stopped)? The instance seems to be responding normally. However, I'm VERY
concerned about the new, extraneous processes. Any ideas?

I'll try down-grading back to 2.6.11.11-bs5 to see if these still exist.

Tony


-----Original Message-----
From: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of
Anthony Brock
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 10:06 AM
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; blaisorblade@yahoo.it
Cc: jdike@addtoit.com
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Problems applying patches to 2.6.12-rc5-mm1


Blaisor,

Thanks! I've removed this patch while leaving everything else applied. The
kernel now compiles. I'm running it and will report back once I have a
backtrace. *sigh*

Tony


>>> Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> 05/31/05 04:32PM >>>
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 01:01, Anthony Brock wrote:
> As an additional FYI, I just refreshed my copy of the tarball. I now stops
> during compile:
>
> # make ARCH=um && make modules ARCH=um
>   CHK     include/linux/version.h
>   UPD     include/linux/version.h
>   SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-um
>
> < output trimmed >
>
>   SYMLINK arch/um/sys-i386/semaphore.c
>   CC      arch/um/sys-i386/semaphore.o
>   CC      arch/um/sys-i386/signal.o
>   CC      arch/um/sys-i386/sigcontext.o
>   AS      arch/um/sys-i386/stub.o
>   CC      arch/um/sys-i386/stub_segv.o
> fixdep: arch/um/sys-i386/.stub_segv.o.d: No such file or directory
> make[1]: *** [arch/um/sys-i386/stub_segv.o] Error 2
> make: *** [arch/um/sys-i386] Error 2
remove av-skas0 and retry, that's the more likely culprit at a very quick
glance.

--
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade





___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=fad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

RE: [uml-devel] Problems applying patches to 2.6.12-rc5-mm1

[Anthony Brock]

I shutdown the process and, just to confirm, restarted it. I received the
following on the console:


Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK
Checking syscall emulation patch for ptrace...OK
Checking advanced syscall emulation patch for ptrace...check_sysemu :
expected SIGTRAP or (SIGTRAP|0x80), got status = 7295


After checking the process table, I confirmed that the kernel had fully
crashed. So I attempted to launch it again. Once more, I have extraneous
processes in the table:


# ps -eo user,pid,ppid,%cpu,%mem,vsz,rss,tty,stat,start,time,cmd |grep -v
grep |egrep 'PID|bindsec' |cut -b 1-131
USER       PID  PPID %CPU %MEM   VSZ  RSS TT       STAT  STARTED     TIME
CMD
bindsec  23901     1  0.0  0.0  2676 1356 ?        Ss   19:27:45 00:00:00
SCREEN -d -m -t bind2 -S bind2 /var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.1
bindsec  23902 23901 22.3  2.0 67516 41956 pts/1   Ss+  19:27:45 00:00:52
/var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.12-rc5-mm1-00-32bit umid=bind2 h
bindsec  23910 23902  0.1  2.0 67516 41956 pts/1   S+   19:27:45 00:00:00
/var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.12-rc5-mm1-00-32bit umid=bind2 h
bindsec  23911 23902  0.0  2.0 67516 41956 pts/1   S+   19:27:46 00:00:00
/var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.12-rc5-mm1-00-32bit umid=bind2 h
bindsec  23912 23902  0.0  0.0   252  104 pts/1    T+   19:27:46 00:00:00
bindsec  26805 23902  0.0  0.0   612  572 pts/1    T+   19:28:31 00:00:00 ?
bindsec  26810 23902  0.0  0.0   592  500 pts/1    T+   19:28:32 00:00:00 ?
?   ?   ?   O(   ??@?   [     ?@ ???
bindsec  26844 23902  0.0  0.0  1720  860 pts/1    T+   19:28:32 00:00:00
bindsec  26873 23902  0.1  0.1  3524 3152 pts/1    T+   19:28:33 00:00:00 `
bindsec  27930 23902  0.0  0.0  1388  168 pts/1    T+   19:28:49 00:00:00 ?
bindsec  27945 23902  0.0  0.0  1368 1368 pts/1    T+   19:28:50 00:00:00
bindsec  27962 23902  0.0  0.0  1404 1404 pts/1    T+   19:28:50 00:00:00
bindsec  27982 23902  0.0  0.0   700   64 pts/1    T+   19:28:50 00:00:00
bindsec  28734 23902  0.0  0.0   488  488 pts/1    T+   19:29:04 00:00:00
#


So, I decided to down-grade to the older 2.6.11.11-bs5 kernel. This is what
I see when trying to launch:


$ TMP=/dev/shm /var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.11.11-00-32bit-bs5 umid=bind2
hwprobe=-sys mem=64M con=pts con0=fd:0,fd:1
ubd0s=/opt/images/instances/bindsec_root.img
ubd1s=/opt/images/instances/bindsec_swap.img
eth0=tuntap,bind2-0,fe:fd:aa:aa:aa:3d root=98:0
Checking for /proc/mm...not found
Support for TT mode is disabled, and no SKAS support is present on the host.
$


I am now truly baffled. I'm assuming that this means I have problems on the
host. How do I generate information that will help with trouble-shooting?
Thanks!

Tony


-----Original Message-----
From: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of
Anthony Brock
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 7:19 PM
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; blaisorblade@yahoo.it
Cc: jdike@addtoit.com
Subject: RE: [uml-devel] Problems applying patches to 2.6.12-rc5-mm1


The instance still hasn't crashed. However, I'm now seeing the following in
the process table:

# ps -eo user,pid,ppid,%cpu,%mem,vsz,rss,tty,stat,start,time,cmd |grep -v
grep |egrep 'PID|bindsec' |cut -b 1-131
USER       PID  PPID %CPU %MEM   VSZ  RSS TT       STAT  STARTED     TIME
CMD
bindsec  12531     1  0.0  0.0  2676 1376 ?        Ss   13:20:04 00:00:00
SCREEN -d -m -t bind2 -S bind2 /var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.1
bindsec  12532 12531  0.4  2.3 67516 49572 pts/1   Ss+  13:20:04 00:01:38
/var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.12-rc5-mm1-00-32bit umid=bind2 h
bindsec  12546 12532  0.0  2.3 67516 49572 pts/1   S+   13:20:04 00:00:01
/var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.12-rc5-mm1-00-32bit umid=bind2 h
bindsec  12547 12532  0.0  2.3 67516 49572 pts/1   S+   13:20:04 00:00:00
/var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.12-rc5-mm1-00-32bit umid=bind2 h
bindsec  12548 12532  0.0  0.0   256  104 pts/1    T+   13:20:04 00:00:00
bindsec  15460 12532  0.0  0.0   612  572 pts/1    T+   13:20:48 00:00:00  0
?   A    ??@ ?  ?   ?   ?   u3
bindsec  15465 12532  0.0  0.0   600  508 pts/1    T+   13:20:48 00:00:00
?@ ?  ?   ?   ?   .>    ?@?   A    ??@ ?  ?   ?   ?    )
bindsec  15497 12532  0.0  0.0  1716  200 pts/1    T+   13:20:49 00:00:00  0
?   ?   ?   ?)   P @?   A    ? @ ?  ?   ?   ?   8)
bindsec  15528 12532  0.0  0.1  3816 3448 pts/1    T+   13:20:49 00:00:04  ?
?   ?   ?   R(   ?(@?   [     (@
bindsec  16592 12532  0.0  0.0  1380  164 pts/1    T+   13:21:06 00:00:00  ?
?   ?   ?   I(   ???    A    A?@ ?  ?   ?   ?   .6
bindsec  16636 12532  0.0  0.0  1416 1416 pts/1    T+   13:21:06 00:00:00
bindsec  16638 12532  0.0  0.0   704   64 pts/1    T+   13:21:06 00:00:00  ?
?   ?   ?   ?<   D?@?   A    a?@    ?   ?   ?   ?<
bindsec  17390 12532  0.0  0.0   488  488 pts/1    T+   13:21:19 00:00:00
bindsec  21243 12532  0.0  0.0  1368 1368 pts/1    T+   18:20:07 00:00:00
#

Why do several of these processes have a process state of 'T+' (traced or
stopped)? The instance seems to be responding normally. However, I'm VERY
concerned about the new, extraneous processes. Any ideas?

I'll try down-grading back to 2.6.11.11-bs5 to see if these still exist.

Tony


-----Original Message-----
From: user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:user-mode-linux-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of
Anthony Brock
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 10:06 AM
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; blaisorblade@yahoo.it
Cc: jdike@addtoit.com
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Problems applying patches to 2.6.12-rc5-mm1


Blaisor,

Thanks! I've removed this patch while leaving everything else applied. The
kernel now compiles. I'm running it and will report back once I have a
backtrace. *sigh*

Tony


>>> Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> 05/31/05 04:32PM >>>
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 01:01, Anthony Brock wrote:
> As an additional FYI, I just refreshed my copy of the tarball. I now stops
> during compile:
>
> # make ARCH=um && make modules ARCH=um
>   CHK     include/linux/version.h
>   UPD     include/linux/version.h
>   SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-um
>
> < output trimmed >
>
>   SYMLINK arch/um/sys-i386/semaphore.c
>   CC      arch/um/sys-i386/semaphore.o
>   CC      arch/um/sys-i386/signal.o
>   CC      arch/um/sys-i386/sigcontext.o
>   AS      arch/um/sys-i386/stub.o
>   CC      arch/um/sys-i386/stub_segv.o
> fixdep: arch/um/sys-i386/.stub_segv.o.d: No such file or directory
> make[1]: *** [arch/um/sys-i386/stub_segv.o] Error 2
> make: *** [arch/um/sys-i386] Error 2
remove av-skas0 and retry, that's the more likely culprit at a very quick
glance.

--
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade





___________________________________
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB
http://mail.yahoo.it



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=fad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Problems applying patches to 2.6.12-rc5-mm1

[Blaisorblade]

On Friday 03 June 2005 04:52, Anthony Brock wrote:
> I shutdown the process and, just to confirm, restarted it. I received the
> following on the console:
>
>
> Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK
> Checking syscall emulation patch for ptrace...OK
> Checking advanced syscall emulation patch for ptrace...check_sysemu :
> expected SIGTRAP or (SIGTRAP|0x80), got status = 7295

WSTOPSIG(status) is 28
The signal is: Window changed

Jeff, what has happened with the SIGWINCH problems? Also I remember a patch 
from Bodo about not losting SIGWINCH (or something like that)...
> After checking the process table, I confirmed that the kernel had fully
> crashed. So I attempted to launch it again. Once more, I have extraneous
> processes in the table:


> So, I decided to down-grade to the older 2.6.11.11-bs5 kernel. This is what
> I see when trying to launch:
>

> $ TMP=/dev/shm /var/run/ramfs/linux-2.6.11.11-00-32bit-bs5 umid=bind2
> hwprobe=-sys mem=64M con=pts con0=fd:0,fd:1
> ubd0s=/opt/images/instances/bindsec_root.img
> ubd1s=/opt/images/instances/bindsec_swap.img
> eth0=tuntap,bind2-0,fe:fd:aa:aa:aa:3d root=98:0
> Checking for /proc/mm...not found
> Support for TT mode is disabled, and no SKAS support is present on the
> host. $

> I am now truly baffled. I'm assuming that this means I have problems on the
> host. How do I generate information that will help with trouble-shooting?
> Thanks!

-- 
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade

	

	
		
___________________________________ 
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB 
http://mail.yahoo.it



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.  How far can you shotput
a projector? How fast can you ride your desk chair down the office luge track?
If you want to score the big prize, get to know the little guy.  
Play to win an NEC 61" plasma display: http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel