From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Svante Eriksson <maillists@svante.eriksson.name>
Cc: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Implementing digital crossover?
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 19:24:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5had7ucxmo.wl@alsa2.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8765ikz7he.fsf@somehost>
At Mon, 20 Oct 2003 09:35:57 +0200,
Svante Eriksson wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> What would be an appropriate ALSA way of implementing a two-way
> digital crossover PCM output? What I would like is for an ALSA PCM
> device to provide two SPDIF outputs with high- and low-band audio for
> the left and right channels, respectively. I'd like for this to be
> transparent to the applications that produce audio output.
>
> Ideally, I would like for the filter parameters to be run-time
> tweakable, at least initially. Would it be possible to use a
> mixer-like control interface for this?
we're considering user-defined controls which can be created/used
dynamically by user apps. not implemented yet, thought.
> Similar to the filter parameters, I would like to control an external
> analog attenuator using an ALSA mixer control (likely through the
> parallel port).
>
> Also, would using two different SPDIF output cards be too bad even for
> a proof-of-concept setup? I'm considering adding another el-cheapo
> CMI8738 based card, but don't know how much the lack of
> synchronization will impact. Has anyone got experience from this? Or
> is it possible to synchronize two cards (possibly by hw modification)?
if you use two different type of cards, there might significant timing
delays. on software level, you can link two streams so that they can
be operated (almost) simultaneously.
but the real situation is quite hardware specific...
> For a real setup, what is a good PCI-based 4-ch 2xSPDIF output card
> that has good ALSA support? It should at least be capable of both
> 48kHz and 44.1kHz output (w/o hw resampling). (Support for 24-bit @
> 96kHz would be appreciated as well.)
for example, the ice1724 boards can be linked on hardware, so you can
get the exact synchronization.
from the perspective of costs, cmipci is the cheapest, but there is no
guarantee that two cards can run parallel in sync.
Takashi
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations
Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge
We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100
http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-21 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-20 7:35 Implementing digital crossover? Svante Eriksson
2003-10-21 17:24 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s5had7ucxmo.wl@alsa2.suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=maillists@svante.eriksson.name \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.