All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Implementing digital crossover?
@ 2003-10-20  7:35 Svante Eriksson
  2003-10-21 17:24 ` Takashi Iwai
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Svante Eriksson @ 2003-10-20  7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ALSA Developers Mailing List

Hi all,

What would be an appropriate ALSA way of implementing a two-way
digital crossover PCM output?  What I would like is for an ALSA PCM
device to provide two SPDIF outputs with high- and low-band audio for
the left and right channels, respectively.  I'd like for this to be
transparent to the applications that produce audio output.

Ideally, I would like for the filter parameters to be run-time
tweakable, at least initially.  Would it be possible to use a
mixer-like control interface for this?

Similar to the filter parameters, I would like to control an external
analog attenuator using an ALSA mixer control (likely through the
parallel port).

Also, would using two different SPDIF output cards be too bad even for
a proof-of-concept setup?  I'm considering adding another el-cheapo
CMI8738 based card, but don't know how much the lack of
synchronization will impact.  Has anyone got experience from this?  Or
is it possible to synchronize two cards (possibly by hw modification)?

For a real setup, what is a good PCI-based 4-ch 2xSPDIF output card
that has good ALSA support?  It should at least be capable of both
48kHz and 44.1kHz output (w/o hw resampling).  (Support for 24-bit @
96kHz would be appreciated as well.)

Does anyone know of similar projects?  The basic Google-searches
didn't yield much.

I'd appreciate any answers.

/Svante
-- 
svante at eriksson dot name


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo
The Event For Linux Datacenter Solutions & Strategies in The Enterprise 
Linux in the Boardroom; in the Front Office; & in the Server Room 
http://www.enterpriselinuxforum.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Implementing digital crossover?
  2003-10-20  7:35 Implementing digital crossover? Svante Eriksson
@ 2003-10-21 17:24 ` Takashi Iwai
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Takashi Iwai @ 2003-10-21 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Svante Eriksson; +Cc: alsa-devel

At Mon, 20 Oct 2003 09:35:57 +0200,
Svante Eriksson wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> What would be an appropriate ALSA way of implementing a two-way
> digital crossover PCM output?  What I would like is for an ALSA PCM
> device to provide two SPDIF outputs with high- and low-band audio for
> the left and right channels, respectively.  I'd like for this to be
> transparent to the applications that produce audio output.
> 
> Ideally, I would like for the filter parameters to be run-time
> tweakable, at least initially.  Would it be possible to use a
> mixer-like control interface for this?
 
we're considering user-defined controls which can be created/used
dynamically by user apps.  not implemented yet, thought.

> Similar to the filter parameters, I would like to control an external
> analog attenuator using an ALSA mixer control (likely through the
> parallel port).
> 
> Also, would using two different SPDIF output cards be too bad even for
> a proof-of-concept setup?  I'm considering adding another el-cheapo
> CMI8738 based card, but don't know how much the lack of
> synchronization will impact.  Has anyone got experience from this?  Or
> is it possible to synchronize two cards (possibly by hw modification)?

if you use two different type of cards, there might significant timing
delays.  on software level, you can link two streams so that they can
be operated (almost) simultaneously.
but the real situation is quite hardware specific...

> For a real setup, what is a good PCI-based 4-ch 2xSPDIF output card
> that has good ALSA support?  It should at least be capable of both
> 48kHz and 44.1kHz output (w/o hw resampling).  (Support for 24-bit @
> 96kHz would be appreciated as well.)

for example, the ice1724 boards can be linked on hardware, so you can
get the exact synchronization.
from the perspective of costs, cmipci is the cheapest, but there is no
guarantee that two cards can run parallel in sync.


Takashi


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations
Here's your chance to show off your extensive product knowledge
We want to know what you know. Tell us and you have a chance to win $100
http://www.zoomerang.com/survey.zgi?HRPT1X3RYQNC5V4MLNSV3E54

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-21 17:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-20  7:35 Implementing digital crossover? Svante Eriksson
2003-10-21 17:24 ` Takashi Iwai

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.