SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_PVERSION Error (Unknown Ioctl)

SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_PVERSION Error (Unknown Ioctl)

[Shane Walton]

When tyring to use beta6, ..., beta9, I get an error
in the device open() call that states an unknown/bad
ioctl command.  The beta6 worked well with the 2.2.19
kernel.  I am wondering if this is a problem when used
with a 2.4.19 kernel.  Can anyone validate?  It seems
that the only way the PVERSION ioctl would be valid is
if the _plugin_ calls are resolved in the open()
function.  As far as I can debug, it seems that the
_plugin_ reference fails and the _hw_ reference is
used instead.  Can someone please point me in the
right direction?  Thanks.

=====
Shane M. Walton, Software Engineer
Digital System Resources, Inc.
dsrelist@yahoo.com : swalton@dsrnet.com
703.234.1674

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_PVERSION Error (Unknown Ioctl)

[Takashi Iwai]

At Mon, 23 Sep 2002 12:45:15 -0700 (PDT),
Shane Walton wrote:
> 
> When tyring to use beta6, ..., beta9, I get an error
> in the device open() call that states an unknown/bad
> ioctl command.  The beta6 worked well with the 2.2.19
> kernel.  I am wondering if this is a problem when used
> with a 2.4.19 kernel.  Can anyone validate?  It seems
> that the only way the PVERSION ioctl would be valid is
> if the _plugin_ calls are resolved in the open()
> function.  As far as I can debug, it seems that the
> _plugin_ reference fails and the _hw_ reference is
> used instead.  Can someone please point me in the
> right direction?  Thanks.

beta6 and beta9 are too old and we won't debug them.
please update to the newer version.


Takashi


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf