From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com, "K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Felipe Alfaro Solana <lkml@felipe-alfaro.com>,
Daniel Schmitt <pnambic@unu.nu>,
alsa-devel <alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q5
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 21:02:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hisazyvu1.wl@alsa2.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040831184846.GB25485@elte.hu>
At Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:48:46 +0200,
Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>
> * Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > Does the attached patch fix this problem?
> >
> >
> > Takashi
> >
> > --- linux/sound/pci/ens1370.c 25 Aug 2004 09:57:03 -0000 1.64
> > +++ linux/sound/pci/ens1370.c 31 Aug 2004 18:17:45 -0000
> > @@ -513,6 +513,7 @@
> > r = inl(ES_REG(ensoniq, 1371_SMPRATE));
> > if ((r & ES_1371_SRC_RAM_BUSY) == 0)
> > return r;
> > + cond_resched();
>
> but ... snd_es1371_wait_src_ready() is being called with
> ensoniq->reg_lock held and you must not reschedule with a spinlock held.
Oh yes, you're right. I overlooked that.
> cond_resched_lock(&ensoniq->req_lock) might not crash immediately, but
> is it really safe to release the driver lock at this point?
The lock can be released, but then *_rate() functions may become racy
with each other.
Ok, the second try.
Takashi
--- linux/sound/pci/ens1370.c 25 Aug 2004 09:57:03 -0000 1.64
+++ linux/sound/pci/ens1370.c 31 Aug 2004 19:00:33 -0000
@@ -372,6 +372,7 @@
struct _snd_ensoniq {
spinlock_t reg_lock;
+ struct semaphore src_mutex;
int irq;
@@ -513,6 +514,7 @@
r = inl(ES_REG(ensoniq, 1371_SMPRATE));
if ((r & ES_1371_SRC_RAM_BUSY) == 0)
return r;
+ cond_resched();
}
snd_printk("wait source ready timeout 0x%lx [0x%x]\n", ES_REG(ensoniq, 1371_SMPRATE), r);
return 0;
@@ -696,6 +698,7 @@
{
unsigned int n, truncm, freq, result;
+ down(&ensoniq->src_mutex);
n = rate / 3000;
if ((1 << n) & ((1 << 15) | (1 << 13) | (1 << 11) | (1 << 9)))
n--;
@@ -719,12 +722,14 @@
snd_es1371_src_write(ensoniq, ES_SMPREG_ADC + ES_SMPREG_VFREQ_FRAC, freq & 0x7fff);
snd_es1371_src_write(ensoniq, ES_SMPREG_VOL_ADC, n << 8);
snd_es1371_src_write(ensoniq, ES_SMPREG_VOL_ADC + 1, n << 8);
+ up(&ensoniq->src_mutex);
}
static void snd_es1371_dac1_rate(ensoniq_t * ensoniq, unsigned int rate)
{
unsigned int freq, r;
+ down(&ensoniq->src_mutex);
freq = ((rate << 15) + 1500) / 3000;
r = (snd_es1371_wait_src_ready(ensoniq) & (ES_1371_SRC_DISABLE | ES_1371_DIS_P2 | ES_1371_DIS_R1)) | ES_1371_DIS_P1;
outl(r, ES_REG(ensoniq, 1371_SMPRATE));
@@ -734,12 +739,14 @@
snd_es1371_src_write(ensoniq, ES_SMPREG_DAC1 + ES_SMPREG_VFREQ_FRAC, freq & 0x7fff);
r = (snd_es1371_wait_src_ready(ensoniq) & (ES_1371_SRC_DISABLE | ES_1371_DIS_P2 | ES_1371_DIS_R1));
outl(r, ES_REG(ensoniq, 1371_SMPRATE));
+ up(&ensoniq->src_mutex);
}
static void snd_es1371_dac2_rate(ensoniq_t * ensoniq, unsigned int rate)
{
unsigned int freq, r;
+ down(&ensoniq->src_mutex);
freq = ((rate << 15) + 1500) / 3000;
r = (snd_es1371_wait_src_ready(ensoniq) & (ES_1371_SRC_DISABLE | ES_1371_DIS_P1 | ES_1371_DIS_R1)) | ES_1371_DIS_P2;
outl(r, ES_REG(ensoniq, 1371_SMPRATE));
@@ -749,6 +756,7 @@
snd_es1371_src_write(ensoniq, ES_SMPREG_DAC2 + ES_SMPREG_VFREQ_FRAC, freq & 0x7fff);
r = (snd_es1371_wait_src_ready(ensoniq) & (ES_1371_SRC_DISABLE | ES_1371_DIS_P1 | ES_1371_DIS_R1));
outl(r, ES_REG(ensoniq, 1371_SMPRATE));
+ up(&ensoniq->src_mutex);
}
#endif /* CHIP1371 */
@@ -870,11 +878,12 @@
case 44100: ensoniq->ctrl |= ES_1370_WTSRSEL(3); break;
default: snd_BUG();
}
-#else
- snd_es1371_dac1_rate(ensoniq, runtime->rate);
#endif
outl(ensoniq->ctrl, ES_REG(ensoniq, CONTROL));
spin_unlock_irq(&ensoniq->reg_lock);
+#ifndef CHIP1370
+ snd_es1371_dac1_rate(ensoniq, runtime->rate);
+#endif
return 0;
}
@@ -908,11 +917,12 @@
ensoniq->ctrl |= ES_1370_PCLKDIVO(ES_1370_SRTODIV(runtime->rate));
ensoniq->u.es1370.pclkdiv_lock |= ES_MODE_PLAY2;
}
-#else
- snd_es1371_dac2_rate(ensoniq, runtime->rate);
#endif
outl(ensoniq->ctrl, ES_REG(ensoniq, CONTROL));
spin_unlock_irq(&ensoniq->reg_lock);
+#ifndef CHIP1370
+ snd_es1371_dac2_rate(ensoniq, runtime->rate);
+#endif
return 0;
}
@@ -944,11 +954,12 @@
ensoniq->ctrl |= ES_1370_PCLKDIVO(ES_1370_SRTODIV(runtime->rate));
ensoniq->u.es1370.pclkdiv_lock |= ES_MODE_CAPTURE;
}
-#else
- snd_es1371_adc_rate(ensoniq, runtime->rate);
#endif
outl(ensoniq->ctrl, ES_REG(ensoniq, CONTROL));
spin_unlock_irq(&ensoniq->reg_lock);
+#ifndef CHIP1370
+ snd_es1371_adc_rate(ensoniq, runtime->rate);
+#endif
return 0;
}
@@ -1886,6 +1897,7 @@
if (ensoniq == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
spin_lock_init(&ensoniq->reg_lock);
+ init_MUTEX(&ensoniq->src_mutex);
ensoniq->card = card;
ensoniq->pci = pci;
ensoniq->irq = -1;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-31 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-31 15:17 [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q5 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-08-31 17:20 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-31 18:09 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-31 18:53 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-08-31 18:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 16:59 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2004-09-02 17:50 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-31 18:19 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-08-31 18:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 19:02 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2004-08-31 18:50 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] <OFD220F58F.002C5901-ON86256F02.005C2FB1-86256F02.005C2FD5@raytheon.com>
2004-09-01 17:09 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-01 15:21 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-09-02 22:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-01 14:37 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-09-01 19:31 ` Takashi Iwai
[not found] <2yiVZ-IZ-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2ylhi-2hg-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2ynLU-42D-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2yqJJ-5ZL-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2yQkS-6Zh-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2zaCV-4FE-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2zaWk-4Yj-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2zmE8-4Zz-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2zngP-5wD-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2zngP-5wD-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2znJS-5Pm-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-08-31 23:06 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] ` <2znJS-5Pm-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2znJS-5Pm-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2znJS-5Pm-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2znJS-5Pm-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-08-31 23:10 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-01 7:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 20:10 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-08-31 20:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 12:46 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-08-30 22:04 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-08-31 6:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-01 7:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-30 19:13 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-08-30 19:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 8:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-02 6:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-28 17:52 [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q0 Lee Revell
2004-08-28 19:44 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q2 Ingo Molnar
2004-08-28 20:10 ` Daniel Schmitt
2004-08-28 20:31 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q3 Ingo Molnar
2004-08-28 21:10 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-28 21:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-28 21:16 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-28 23:51 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-29 2:35 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-29 5:43 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q4 Ingo Molnar
2004-08-30 9:06 ` [patch] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc1-bk4-Q5 Ingo Molnar
2004-08-30 14:25 ` Thomas Charbonnel
2004-08-30 18:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 19:23 ` Thomas Charbonnel
2004-08-31 19:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 19:45 ` Thomas Charbonnel
2004-08-31 6:40 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-31 6:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 23:03 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-01 15:52 ` Martin Josefsson
2004-09-01 21:15 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-01 21:30 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-31 7:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 19:21 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-31 19:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 19:47 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-31 19:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 20:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 20:10 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-31 20:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 20:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 20:34 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-31 20:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-08-31 20:41 ` Lee Revell
2004-08-31 17:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2004-09-01 1:43 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-01 2:30 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-01 7:27 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s5hisazyvu1.wl@alsa2.suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=kr@cybsft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@felipe-alfaro.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pnambic@unu.nu \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.