All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
Cc: Mathias Payer <mathias.payer@nebelwelt.net>,
	Wenwen Wang <wang6495@umn.edu>,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>, YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
	security@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix an OOB bug in uac_mixer_unit_bmControls
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 19:59:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hmug77jwi.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKpmkkXNcQWxco2Zxf5rBwyt7mHHkfZ2+COtZROyKmgsq2Ch_Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 18:47:05 +0200,
Hui Peng wrote:
> 
> No, there was not triggering. I found it accidentally when I was going through
> the code.
> 
> Yeah, you are right. it is handled in the last check. Is it defined in the
> spec that the descriptor needs to have 4/6/2 additional bytes for the
> bmControl field?, if so, it is easier to understand the using the code in the
> way in my first patch.
> 
> If you think this is unnecessary, we can skip this patch.

Well, the patch essentially open-codes what the helper function does
adds one more check unnecessarily, so I don't think it worth.
Let's skip it.


thanks,

Takashi

> On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 12:18 PM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote:
> 
>     On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 17:57:38 +0200,
>     Hui Peng wrote:
>     >
>     > Looking around, there are other suspicious codes. E.g., in the following
>     > function, it seems to be the same as `uac_mixer_unit_bmControls`, but it
>     is
>     > accessing `desc->bNrInPins + 5`, in case of UAC_VERSION_1.
>     > Is this intended?
>    
>     Yes, this isn't for the mixer unit but for the processing unit.
>     They have different definitions.
>    
>     Now back to the original report: I read the code again but fail to see
>     where is OOB access.  Let's see the function:
>    
>     static int uac_mixer_unit_get_channels(struct mixer_build *state,
>                                            struct uac_mixer_unit_descriptor
>     *desc)
>     {
>             int mu_channels;
>             void *c;
>    
>             if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc))
>                     return -EINVAL;
>             if (!desc->bNrInPins)
>                     return -EINVAL;
>             if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins)
>                     return -EINVAL;
>    
>             switch (state->mixer->protocol) {
>             case UAC_VERSION_1:
>             case UAC_VERSION_2:
>             default:
>                     if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 1)
>                             return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */
>                     mu_channels = uac_mixer_unit_bNrChannels(desc);
>                     break;
>             case UAC_VERSION_3:
>                     mu_channels = get_cluster_channels_v3(state,
>                                     uac3_mixer_unit_wClusterDescrID(desc));
>                     break;
>             }
>    
>             if (!mu_channels)
>                     return 0;
>    
>     ... until this point, mu_channels is calculated but no actual access
>     happens.  Then:
>    
>             c = uac_mixer_unit_bmControls(desc, state->mixer->protocol);
>    
>     ... this returns the *address* of the bmControls bitmap.  At this
>     point, it's not accessed yet.  Now:
>    
>             if (c - (void *)desc + (mu_channels - 1) / 8 >= desc->bLength)
>                     return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */
>    
>     ... here we check whether the actual bitmap address plus the max
>     bitmap size overflows bLength.  And if it overflows, returns 0,
>     indicating no bitmap available.
>    
>     So the code doesn't access but checks properly beforehand as far as I
>     understand.  Is the actual OOB access triggered by some program?
> 
>     thanks,
>    
>     Takashi
>    
>     >
>     > static inline __u8 *uac_processing_unit_bmControls(struct
>     uac_processing_unit_descriptor *desc,
>     >                                                    int protocol)
>     > {
>     >         switch (protocol) {
>     >         case UAC_VERSION_1:
>     >                 return &desc->baSourceID[desc->bNrInPins + 5];
>     >         case UAC_VERSION_2:
>     >                 return &desc->baSourceID[desc->bNrInPins + 6];
>     >         case UAC_VERSION_3:
>     >                 return &desc->baSourceID[desc->bNrInPins + 2];
>     >         default:
>     >                 return NULL;
>     >         }
>     > }
>     >
>     > On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 2:55 AM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote:
>     >
>     >     On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 06:32:07 +0200,
>     >     Hui Peng wrote:
>     >     >
>     >     > `uac_mixer_unit_get_channels` calls `uac_mixer_unit_bmControls`
>     >     > to get pointer to bmControls field. The current implementation of
>     >     > `uac_mixer_unit_get_channels` does properly check the size of
>     >     > uac_mixer_unit_descriptor descriptor and may allow OOB access
>     >     > in `uac_mixer_unit_bmControls`.
>     >     >
>     >     > Reported-by: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
>     >     > Reported-by: Mathias Payer <mathias.payer@nebelwelt.net>
>     >     > Signed-off-by: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
>     >   
>     >     Ah a good catch.
>     >   
>     >     One easier fix in this case would be to get the offset from
>     >     uac_mixer_unit_bmControls(), e.g.
>     >   
>     >             /* calculate the offset of bmControls field */
>     >             size_t bmc_offset = uac_mixer_unit_bmControls(NULL,
>     protocol) -
>     >     NULL;
>     >             ....
>     >             if (desc->bLength < bmc_offset)
>     >                     return 0;
>     >   
>     >     thanks,
>     >   
>     >     Takashi
>     >
>     >     > ---
>     >     >  sound/usb/mixer.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
>     >     >  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>     >     >
>     >     > diff --git a/sound/usb/mixer.c b/sound/usb/mixer.c
>     >     > index b5927c3d5bc0..00e6274a63c3 100644
>     >     > --- a/sound/usb/mixer.c
>     >     > +++ b/sound/usb/mixer.c
>     >     > @@ -738,28 +738,39 @@ static int get_cluster_channels_v3(struct
>     >     mixer_build *state, unsigned int clust
>     >     >  static int uac_mixer_unit_get_channels(struct mixer_build *state,
>     >     >                                      struct
>     uac_mixer_unit_descriptor
>     >     *desc)
>     >     >  {
>     >     > -     int mu_channels;
>     >     > +     int mu_channels = 0;
>     >     >       void *c;
>     >     > 
>     >     > -     if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc))
>     >     > -             return -EINVAL;
>     >     >       if (!desc->bNrInPins)
>     >     >               return -EINVAL;
>     >     > -     if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins)
>     >     > -             return -EINVAL;
>     >     > 
>     >     >       switch (state->mixer->protocol) {
>     >     >       case UAC_VERSION_1:
>     >     > +             // limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControls
>     >     > +             if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins
>     + 4)
>     >     > +                     return 0;
>     >     > +
>     >     > +             mu_channels = uac_mixer_unit_bNrChannels(desc);
>     >     > +             break;
>     >     > +
>     >     >       case UAC_VERSION_2:
>     >     > -     default:
>     >     > -             if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins
>     + 1)
>     >     > +             // limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControls
>     >     > +             if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins
>     + 6)
>     >     >                       return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */
>     >     > +
>     >     >               mu_channels = uac_mixer_unit_bNrChannels(desc);
>     >     >               break;
>     >     >       case UAC_VERSION_3:
>     >     > +             // limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControls
>     >     > +             if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins
>     + 2)
>     >     > +                     return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */
>     >     > +
>     >     >               mu_channels = get_cluster_channels_v3(state,
>     >     >                               uac3_mixer_unit_wClusterDescrID
>     (desc));
>     >     >               break;
>     >     > +
>     >     > +     default:
>     >     > +             break;
>     >     >       }
>     >     > 
>     >     >       if (!mu_channels)
>     >     > --
>     >     > 2.22.1
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >
>     >
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
Cc: security@kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
	YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Mathias Payer <mathias.payer@nebelwelt.net>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Wenwen Wang <wang6495@umn.edu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix an OOB bug in uac_mixer_unit_bmControls
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 19:59:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hmug77jwi.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKpmkkXNcQWxco2Zxf5rBwyt7mHHkfZ2+COtZROyKmgsq2Ch_Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 18:47:05 +0200,
Hui Peng wrote:
> 
> No, there was not triggering. I found it accidentally when I was going through
> the code.
> 
> Yeah, you are right. it is handled in the last check. Is it defined in the
> spec that the descriptor needs to have 4/6/2 additional bytes for the
> bmControl field?, if so, it is easier to understand the using the code in the
> way in my first patch.
> 
> If you think this is unnecessary, we can skip this patch.

Well, the patch essentially open-codes what the helper function does
adds one more check unnecessarily, so I don't think it worth.
Let's skip it.


thanks,

Takashi

> On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 12:18 PM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote:
> 
>     On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 17:57:38 +0200,
>     Hui Peng wrote:
>     >
>     > Looking around, there are other suspicious codes. E.g., in the following
>     > function, it seems to be the same as `uac_mixer_unit_bmControls`, but it
>     is
>     > accessing `desc->bNrInPins + 5`, in case of UAC_VERSION_1.
>     > Is this intended?
>    
>     Yes, this isn't for the mixer unit but for the processing unit.
>     They have different definitions.
>    
>     Now back to the original report: I read the code again but fail to see
>     where is OOB access.  Let's see the function:
>    
>     static int uac_mixer_unit_get_channels(struct mixer_build *state,
>                                            struct uac_mixer_unit_descriptor
>     *desc)
>     {
>             int mu_channels;
>             void *c;
>    
>             if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc))
>                     return -EINVAL;
>             if (!desc->bNrInPins)
>                     return -EINVAL;
>             if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins)
>                     return -EINVAL;
>    
>             switch (state->mixer->protocol) {
>             case UAC_VERSION_1:
>             case UAC_VERSION_2:
>             default:
>                     if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins + 1)
>                             return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */
>                     mu_channels = uac_mixer_unit_bNrChannels(desc);
>                     break;
>             case UAC_VERSION_3:
>                     mu_channels = get_cluster_channels_v3(state,
>                                     uac3_mixer_unit_wClusterDescrID(desc));
>                     break;
>             }
>    
>             if (!mu_channels)
>                     return 0;
>    
>     ... until this point, mu_channels is calculated but no actual access
>     happens.  Then:
>    
>             c = uac_mixer_unit_bmControls(desc, state->mixer->protocol);
>    
>     ... this returns the *address* of the bmControls bitmap.  At this
>     point, it's not accessed yet.  Now:
>    
>             if (c - (void *)desc + (mu_channels - 1) / 8 >= desc->bLength)
>                     return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */
>    
>     ... here we check whether the actual bitmap address plus the max
>     bitmap size overflows bLength.  And if it overflows, returns 0,
>     indicating no bitmap available.
>    
>     So the code doesn't access but checks properly beforehand as far as I
>     understand.  Is the actual OOB access triggered by some program?
> 
>     thanks,
>    
>     Takashi
>    
>     >
>     > static inline __u8 *uac_processing_unit_bmControls(struct
>     uac_processing_unit_descriptor *desc,
>     >                                                    int protocol)
>     > {
>     >         switch (protocol) {
>     >         case UAC_VERSION_1:
>     >                 return &desc->baSourceID[desc->bNrInPins + 5];
>     >         case UAC_VERSION_2:
>     >                 return &desc->baSourceID[desc->bNrInPins + 6];
>     >         case UAC_VERSION_3:
>     >                 return &desc->baSourceID[desc->bNrInPins + 2];
>     >         default:
>     >                 return NULL;
>     >         }
>     > }
>     >
>     > On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 2:55 AM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote:
>     >
>     >     On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 06:32:07 +0200,
>     >     Hui Peng wrote:
>     >     >
>     >     > `uac_mixer_unit_get_channels` calls `uac_mixer_unit_bmControls`
>     >     > to get pointer to bmControls field. The current implementation of
>     >     > `uac_mixer_unit_get_channels` does properly check the size of
>     >     > uac_mixer_unit_descriptor descriptor and may allow OOB access
>     >     > in `uac_mixer_unit_bmControls`.
>     >     >
>     >     > Reported-by: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
>     >     > Reported-by: Mathias Payer <mathias.payer@nebelwelt.net>
>     >     > Signed-off-by: Hui Peng <benquike@gmail.com>
>     >   
>     >     Ah a good catch.
>     >   
>     >     One easier fix in this case would be to get the offset from
>     >     uac_mixer_unit_bmControls(), e.g.
>     >   
>     >             /* calculate the offset of bmControls field */
>     >             size_t bmc_offset = uac_mixer_unit_bmControls(NULL,
>     protocol) -
>     >     NULL;
>     >             ....
>     >             if (desc->bLength < bmc_offset)
>     >                     return 0;
>     >   
>     >     thanks,
>     >   
>     >     Takashi
>     >
>     >     > ---
>     >     >  sound/usb/mixer.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++-------
>     >     >  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>     >     >
>     >     > diff --git a/sound/usb/mixer.c b/sound/usb/mixer.c
>     >     > index b5927c3d5bc0..00e6274a63c3 100644
>     >     > --- a/sound/usb/mixer.c
>     >     > +++ b/sound/usb/mixer.c
>     >     > @@ -738,28 +738,39 @@ static int get_cluster_channels_v3(struct
>     >     mixer_build *state, unsigned int clust
>     >     >  static int uac_mixer_unit_get_channels(struct mixer_build *state,
>     >     >                                      struct
>     uac_mixer_unit_descriptor
>     >     *desc)
>     >     >  {
>     >     > -     int mu_channels;
>     >     > +     int mu_channels = 0;
>     >     >       void *c;
>     >     > 
>     >     > -     if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc))
>     >     > -             return -EINVAL;
>     >     >       if (!desc->bNrInPins)
>     >     >               return -EINVAL;
>     >     > -     if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins)
>     >     > -             return -EINVAL;
>     >     > 
>     >     >       switch (state->mixer->protocol) {
>     >     >       case UAC_VERSION_1:
>     >     > +             // limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControls
>     >     > +             if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins
>     + 4)
>     >     > +                     return 0;
>     >     > +
>     >     > +             mu_channels = uac_mixer_unit_bNrChannels(desc);
>     >     > +             break;
>     >     > +
>     >     >       case UAC_VERSION_2:
>     >     > -     default:
>     >     > -             if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins
>     + 1)
>     >     > +             // limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControls
>     >     > +             if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins
>     + 6)
>     >     >                       return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */
>     >     > +
>     >     >               mu_channels = uac_mixer_unit_bNrChannels(desc);
>     >     >               break;
>     >     >       case UAC_VERSION_3:
>     >     > +             // limit derived from uac_mixer_unit_bmControls
>     >     > +             if (desc->bLength < sizeof(*desc) + desc->bNrInPins
>     + 2)
>     >     > +                     return 0; /* no bmControls -> skip */
>     >     > +
>     >     >               mu_channels = get_cluster_channels_v3(state,
>     >     >                               uac3_mixer_unit_wClusterDescrID
>     (desc));
>     >     >               break;
>     >     > +
>     >     > +     default:
>     >     > +             break;
>     >     >       }
>     >     > 
>     >     >       if (!mu_channels)
>     >     > --
>     >     > 2.22.1
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >
>     >
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-17 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-17  4:32 [PATCH] Fix an OOB bug in uac_mixer_unit_bmControls Hui Peng
2019-08-17  6:55 ` Takashi Iwai
2019-08-17  6:55   ` Takashi Iwai
2019-08-17 15:57   ` Hui Peng
2019-08-17 16:18     ` Takashi Iwai
2019-08-17 16:47       ` Hui Peng
2019-08-17 17:59         ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2019-08-17 17:59           ` Takashi Iwai
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-08-19 22:00 Hui Peng
2019-08-19 22:01 ` Hui Peng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=s5hmug77jwi.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
    --to=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=benquike@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.payer@nebelwelt.net \
    --cc=security@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    --cc=wang6495@umn.edu \
    --cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.