Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mfd: Add support for Cherry Trail Dollar Cove TI PMIC

[Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>]

On Tue, 05 Sep 2017 09:25:53 +0200,
Lee Jones wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 04 Sep 2017, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 04 Sep 2017 15:37:32 +0200,
> > Lee Jones wrote:
> > > 
> > > > +static struct mfd_cell dc_ti_dev[] = {
> > > > +	{
> > > > +		.name = "dc_ti_pwrbtn",
> > > > +		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(power_button_resources),
> > > > +		.resources = power_button_resources,
> > > > +	},
> > > > +	{
> > > 
> > > Place these on the same line.
> > 
> > Does this and ...
> > 
> > 
> > > > +	},
> > > > +	{
> > > > +		.name = "dc_ti_region",
> > > > +	},
> > > 
> > > This should be a one line entry:
> > > 
> > > 	{ .name = "dc_ti_region" },
> > 
> > .... this match together?  The result would be like:
> > 
> > static struct mfd_cell dc_ti_dev[] = {
> > 	{
> > 		.name = "dc_ti_pwrbtn",
> > 		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(power_button_resources),
> > 		.resources = power_button_resources,
> > 	}, {
> > 		.name = "chtdc_ti_adc",
> > 		.num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(adc_resources),
> > 	.....
> > 	}, {	.name = "chtdc_ti_region",	},
> > };
> > 
> > which I find a bit inconsistent.
> 
> No, it doesn't.

Heh, I find such a mixture annoying, but it's a matter of taste.

> The single lines need to be on their own.

So did I already in the v5 patch submitted yesterday.


thanks,

Takashi