From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
perex@suse.cz, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.10-mm1: ALSA ac97 compile error with CONFIG_PM=n
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:16:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hoeg5f1ib.wl@alsa2.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050104001130.GT2980@stusta.de>
At Tue, 4 Jan 2005 01:11:30 +0100,
Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 05:07:08PM -0600, Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com wrote:
> > I was looking to compare RT latency between this kernel and the latest from
> > Ingo and I had the following warnings / errors building 2.6.10-mm1:
> >
> > [no apparent compile / link errors]
> > *** Warning: "snd_ac97_restore_iec958" [sound/pci/ac97/snd-ac97-codec.ko]
> > undefined!
> > *** Warning: "snd_ac97_restore_status" [sound/pci/ac97/snd-ac97-codec.ko]
> > undefined!
> >...
> > To fix this, should I just add the EXPORT_SYMBOL lines for these symbols
> > snd_ac97_restore_status snd_ac97_restore_iec958
> > or is something more needed?
>
> That's not the problem, since function and definition are in the same
> module.
>
> You didn't send your .config, but looking at the code it seems
> CONFIG_PM=n was the culprit.
Yes, it's because of lack of #ifdef CONFIG_PM in ac97_patch.c.
It was already fixed in the linux-sound bk tree.
Takashi
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
perex@suse.cz, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.10-mm1: ALSA ac97 compile error with CONFIG_PM=n
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:16:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hoeg5f1ib.wl@alsa2.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050104001130.GT2980@stusta.de>
At Tue, 4 Jan 2005 01:11:30 +0100,
Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 05:07:08PM -0600, Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com wrote:
> > I was looking to compare RT latency between this kernel and the latest from
> > Ingo and I had the following warnings / errors building 2.6.10-mm1:
> >
> > [no apparent compile / link errors]
> > *** Warning: "snd_ac97_restore_iec958" [sound/pci/ac97/snd-ac97-codec.ko]
> > undefined!
> > *** Warning: "snd_ac97_restore_status" [sound/pci/ac97/snd-ac97-codec.ko]
> > undefined!
> >...
> > To fix this, should I just add the EXPORT_SYMBOL lines for these symbols
> > snd_ac97_restore_status snd_ac97_restore_iec958
> > or is something more needed?
>
> That's not the problem, since function and definition are in the same
> module.
>
> You didn't send your .config, but looking at the code it seems
> CONFIG_PM=n was the culprit.
Yes, it's because of lack of #ifdef CONFIG_PM in ac97_patch.c.
It was already fixed in the linux-sound bk tree.
Takashi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-04 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-03 23:07 2.6.10-mm1 Mark_H_Johnson
2005-01-03 23:15 ` 2.6.10-mm1 Andrew Morton
2005-01-04 0:11 ` 2.6.10-mm1: ALSA ac97 compile error with CONFIG_PM=n Adrian Bunk
2005-01-04 0:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-01-04 19:16 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2005-01-04 19:16 ` Takashi Iwai
2005-01-04 0:15 ` [2.6 patch] add missing dependencies on MTD_PARTITIONS (fwd) Adrian Bunk
2005-01-04 0:15 ` Adrian Bunk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-04 17:01 2.6.10-mm1: ALSA ac97 compile error with CONFIG_PM=n Mark_H_Johnson
2005-01-04 19:25 Mark_H_Johnson
2005-01-04 19:25 ` Mark_H_Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s5hoeg5f1ib.wl@alsa2.suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.