* period/buffer bug on pmac ?
@ 2004-11-11 21:17 danny
2004-11-13 11:35 ` danny
2004-11-15 16:53 ` Clemens Ladisch
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: danny @ 2004-11-11 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alsa-devel
In the process of fixing up the alsa output plugin of bmp a bit I've come
upon a weird problem. The mp3s I was playing played to fast, with a
audible click each few millisecond. This seemed to only happen when the
period size was not a power of 2 (the output plugin used to set
period_time). I've now calculated the period_size myself from the rate and
set it to the nearest power of 2. Which seems to work fine, except in the
case that the mp3 i play is not your regular 441000 kbs encoded, but for
instance 32000.
No error occurs on setting the rate (and it gets set at
32000, although I doubt that the card, a pmac snapper, can do this) It
seems that period size and buffersize get downscaled with a factor
441000/32000. And the weird screwed up sound occurs again with these mp3s.
The strangest thing is that although snd_pcm_params_get_* returns,
for instance, 32000, 5944 and 763 for rate, buffersize and periodsize
respectively, a cat /proc/asound/card0/pcm0p/sub0/hw_params tells me that
actually the rate is 44100 and buffer 8192 and period 1015 (I also checked
on my x86 with sblive, but there the proc entry says that the rate is
32000, so I assume that card can downsample in hardware?).
Is this a bug in the driver or normal behaviour? If it is the last, how
should I set the periodsize to something that both corresponds with the
users preferenced sample time and with the fact that it apparently, has to
be a power of 2?
danny
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: period/buffer bug on pmac ?
2004-11-11 21:17 period/buffer bug on pmac ? danny
@ 2004-11-13 11:35 ` danny
2004-11-15 16:53 ` Clemens Ladisch
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: danny @ 2004-11-13 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: danny; +Cc: alsa-devel
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 danny@mailmij.org wrote:
>
> In the process of fixing up the alsa output plugin of bmp a bit I've come
> upon a weird problem. The mp3s I was playing played to fast, with a
> audible click each few millisecond. This seemed to only happen when the
> period size was not a power of 2 (the output plugin used to set
> period_time). I've now calculated the period_size myself from the rate and
> set it to the nearest power of 2. Which seems to work fine, except in the
> case that the mp3 i play is not your regular 441000 kbs encoded, but for
> instance 32000.
>
> No error occurs on setting the rate (and it gets set at
> 32000, although I doubt that the card, a pmac snapper, can do this) It
> seems that period size and buffersize get downscaled with a factor
> 441000/32000. And the weird screwed up sound occurs again with these mp3s.
> The strangest thing is that although snd_pcm_params_get_* returns,
> for instance, 32000, 5944 and 763 for rate, buffersize and periodsize
> respectively, a cat /proc/asound/card0/pcm0p/sub0/hw_params tells me that
> actually the rate is 44100 and buffer 8192 and period 1015 (I also checked
> on my x86 with sblive, but there the proc entry says that the rate is
> 32000, so I assume that card can downsample in hardware?).
>
> Is this a bug in the driver or normal behaviour? If it is the last, how
> should I set the periodsize to something that both corresponds with the
> users preferenced sample time and with the fact that it apparently, has to
> be a power of 2?
>
Seems everybody is talking about period/buffer size but nobody can tell me
whether the above is a bug in alsa or not?
I can't fix it if I cannot get a hint...
d.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: period/buffer bug on pmac ?
2004-11-11 21:17 period/buffer bug on pmac ? danny
2004-11-13 11:35 ` danny
@ 2004-11-15 16:53 ` Clemens Ladisch
2004-11-16 9:57 ` Giuliano Pochini
2004-11-16 18:37 ` danny
1 sibling, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Clemens Ladisch @ 2004-11-15 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: danny; +Cc: alsa-devel
danny@mailmij.org wrote:
> In the process of fixing up the alsa output plugin of bmp a bit I've come
> upon a weird problem. The mp3s I was playing played to fast, with a
> audible click each few millisecond. This seemed to only happen when the
> period size was not a power of 2 (the output plugin used to set
> period_time). I've now calculated the period_size myself from the rate and
> set it to the nearest power of 2. Which seems to work fine,
There is no general power-of-2 requirement in ALSA. The pmac driver
doesn't set a hardware constraint; if the hardware requires power-of-2
periods, it's a bug in the driver.
> except in the case that the mp3 i play is not your regular 441000
> kbs encoded, but for instance 32000.
>
> No error occurs on setting the rate (and it gets set at
> 32000, although I doubt that the card, a pmac snapper, can do this) It
> seems that period size and buffersize get downscaled with a factor
> 441000/32000. And the weird screwed up sound occurs again with these mp3s.
> The strangest thing is that although snd_pcm_params_get_* returns,
> for instance, 32000, 5944 and 763 for rate, buffersize and periodsize
> respectively, a cat /proc/asound/card0/pcm0p/sub0/hw_params tells me that
> actually the rate is 44100 and buffer 8192 and period 1015
The "default" device uses the "plug" plugin for automatic sample rate
conversion.
HTH
Clemens
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: period/buffer bug on pmac ?
2004-11-15 16:53 ` Clemens Ladisch
@ 2004-11-16 9:57 ` Giuliano Pochini
2004-11-16 18:37 ` danny
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Giuliano Pochini @ 2004-11-16 9:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Clemens Ladisch; +Cc: alsa-devel, danny
On 15-Nov-2004 Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> danny@mailmij.org wrote:
>> In the process of fixing up the alsa output plugin of bmp a bit I've come
>> upon a weird problem. The mp3s I was playing played to fast, with a
>> audible click each few millisecond. This seemed to only happen when the
>> period size was not a power of 2 (the output plugin used to set
>> period_time). I've now calculated the period_size myself from the rate and
>> set it to the nearest power of 2. Which seems to work fine,
>
> There is no general power-of-2 requirement in ALSA. The pmac driver
> doesn't set a hardware constraint; if the hardware requires power-of-2
> periods, it's a bug in the driver.
There in so such constraint set in the driver indeed. I don't know
that hardware, but it seems (at least on my G4MDD which has a Snapper
chip) that po2 is required.
--
Giuliano.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: period/buffer bug on pmac ?
2004-11-15 16:53 ` Clemens Ladisch
2004-11-16 9:57 ` Giuliano Pochini
@ 2004-11-16 18:37 ` danny
2004-11-17 11:45 ` Takashi Iwai
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: danny @ 2004-11-16 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Clemens Ladisch; +Cc: alsa-devel
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> danny@mailmij.org wrote:
> > In the process of fixing up the alsa output plugin of bmp a bit I've come
> > upon a weird problem. The mp3s I was playing played to fast, with a
> > audible click each few millisecond. This seemed to only happen when the
> > period size was not a power of 2 (the output plugin used to set
> > period_time). I've now calculated the period_size myself from the rate and
> > set it to the nearest power of 2. Which seems to work fine,
>
> There is no general power-of-2 requirement in ALSA. The pmac driver
> doesn't set a hardware constraint; if the hardware requires power-of-2
> periods, it's a bug in the driver.
>
Thanks for the reply!
I've been hacking around a bit in the driver and think it needs some
contraints, although its not (like i first thought) limited to a power of
2. Constraining periods to integer and requiring at least 3 periods seem
to fix all issues i have. However, these requirements sometimes
drastically affect the period AND buffersize requested by the app. I play
with it a bit more and submit a patch soon.
d.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: period/buffer bug on pmac ?
2004-11-16 18:37 ` danny
@ 2004-11-17 11:45 ` Takashi Iwai
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Takashi Iwai @ 2004-11-17 11:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: danny; +Cc: Clemens Ladisch, alsa-devel
At Tue, 16 Nov 2004 19:37:39 +0100 (CET),
<danny@mailmij.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
>
> > danny@mailmij.org wrote:
> > > In the process of fixing up the alsa output plugin of bmp a bit I've come
> > > upon a weird problem. The mp3s I was playing played to fast, with a
> > > audible click each few millisecond. This seemed to only happen when the
> > > period size was not a power of 2 (the output plugin used to set
> > > period_time). I've now calculated the period_size myself from the rate and
> > > set it to the nearest power of 2. Which seems to work fine,
> >
> > There is no general power-of-2 requirement in ALSA. The pmac driver
> > doesn't set a hardware constraint; if the hardware requires power-of-2
> > periods, it's a bug in the driver.
> >
> Thanks for the reply!
> I've been hacking around a bit in the driver and think it needs some
> contraints, although its not (like i first thought) limited to a power of
> 2. Constraining periods to integer and requiring at least 3 periods seem
> to fix all issues i have.
That's good to know!
> However, these requirements sometimes
> drastically affect the period AND buffersize requested by the app. I play
> with it a bit more and submit a patch soon.
Don't forget summary and signed-off-by lines :)
thanks,
Takashi
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE
FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines
robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match
for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-11-17 11:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-11-11 21:17 period/buffer bug on pmac ? danny
2004-11-13 11:35 ` danny
2004-11-15 16:53 ` Clemens Ladisch
2004-11-16 9:57 ` Giuliano Pochini
2004-11-16 18:37 ` danny
2004-11-17 11:45 ` Takashi Iwai
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.