Beta11 Release - PM Required?

Beta11 Release - PM Required?

[Peter Heatwole]

    I downloaded the beta11 tarball and attempted to compile. The compile
quitted with errors from alsa-kernel/core/pcm_native.c, stating that
the macros `snd_power_lock' and `snd_power_wait' had two arguments,
and pcm_native.c was passing only one. I didn't completely search out
the problem, but I did notice that core.h defines snd_power_* as either
functions or macros, depending on whether the kernel had been compiled
with power management support (CONFIG_PM). I enabled power management
and recompiled my kernel, and alsa-driver built without further
problems.

(I think there may have been other macros affected, but I haven't
reverted to a non PM-enabled kernel to check.)


RedHat 7.2
Kernel 2.4.17
gcc 2.96


-- Peter Heatwole
"Murphy was just a well known pessimist."

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel

Re: Beta11 Release - PM Required?

[Takashi Iwai]

Hi,

At Tue, 19 Feb 2002 13:53:52 -0800,
Peter Heatwole wrote:
> 
>     I downloaded the beta11 tarball and attempted to compile. The compile
> quitted with errors from alsa-kernel/core/pcm_native.c, stating that
> the macros `snd_power_lock' and `snd_power_wait' had two arguments,
> and pcm_native.c was passing only one. I didn't completely search out
> the problem, but I did notice that core.h defines snd_power_* as either
> functions or macros, depending on whether the kernel had been compiled
> with power management support (CONFIG_PM). I enabled power management
> and recompiled my kernel, and alsa-driver built without further
> problems.

there was a bug in beta11 and already fixed on cvs.
please check out cvs version.


Takashi

_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel