From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dave Marquardt" <davemarq@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 10/11] scsi: ibmvfc: register and use asynchronous sub CRQ for events
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2026 19:42:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-163319@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261007-ibmvfc-fpin-support-v13-10-b816abfa4fcc@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] scsi: ibmvfc: host state machine stall if ibmvfc_reg_sub_crqs() fails
- [High] scsi: ibmvfc: NULL pointer deref in channel setup when mq_enabled=0
--
commit 3dd02df8d62690f440ff03238afa2613397c578a
Author: Dave Marquardt <davemarq@linux.ibm.com>
scsi: ibmvfc: register and use asynchronous sub CRQ for events
Wire the async sub-CRQ into the sub-CRQ lifecycle so it is allocated,
registered, and freed alongside the SCSI channel queues. Updates
ibmvfc_set_login_info() to advertise related capabilities.
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc-core.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc-core.c
> index 76246002ac724..acc11f3a237e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc-core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -5821,6 +5828,7 @@ static void ibmvfc_channel_setup_done(struct ibmvfc_event *evt)
> for (i = 0; i < nvme->active_queues; i++)
> nvme->scrqs[i].vios_cookie =
> be64_to_cpu(setup->channel_handles[scsi->active_queues + i]);
> + async->scrqs[0].vios_cookie = be64_to_cpu(setup->async_sub_crq_handle);
[Severity: High]
Can this cause a NULL pointer dereference when the module parameter mq_enabled
is 0?
If mq_enabled is 0, ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs() returns early and skips allocation,
leaving async->scrqs as NULL but vhost->do_enquiry as 1.
If the VIOS later advertises IBMVFC_CAN_SUPPORT_CHANNELS during NPIV login,
ibmvfc_npiv_login_done() sees do_enquiry is true and issues a channel enquiry.
When that completes, we reach this code and unconditionally dereference the
unallocated async->scrqs array.
[ ... ]
> @@ -5880,6 +5889,7 @@ static void ibmvfc_channel_setup(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost)
> for (i = 0; i < nvme_channels; i++)
> setup_buf->channel_handles[scsi_channels + i] =
> cpu_to_be64(nvme->scrqs[i].cookie);
> + setup_buf->async_sub_crq_handle = cpu_to_be64(async->scrqs[0].cookie);
> }
[Severity: High]
Similarly, can this unconditional access to async->scrqs[0].cookie trigger a
NULL pointer dereference when mq_enabled is 0?
[ ... ]
> @@ -7023,17 +7039,38 @@ static int ibmvfc_alloc_channels(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost,
[ ... ]
> static void ibmvfc_init_sub_crqs(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost)
> {
> ENTER;
> if (!vhost->mq_enabled)
> return;
>
> - if (ibmvfc_alloc_channels(vhost, &vhost->scsi_scrqs)) {
> - vhost->do_enquiry = 0;
> - vhost->mq_enabled = 0;
> - return;
> - }
> + /* register async_sub_crq channel */
> + if (ibmvfc_alloc_channels(vhost, &vhost->async_scrqs))
> + goto out;
> +
> + ibmvfc_reg_sub_crqs(vhost, &vhost->async_scrqs);
[Severity: High]
Does this cause a host state machine stall if ibmvfc_reg_sub_crqs() fails?
If ibmvfc_reg_sub_crqs() fails internally, it clears vhost->do_enquiry but
leaves vhost->mq_enabled set to 1. Because mq_enabled remains true,
ibmvfc_set_login_info() continues to advertise IBMVFC_CAN_USE_CHANNELS to
the VIOS.
When the VIOS responds with IBMVFC_CAN_SUPPORT_CHANNELS,
ibmvfc_npiv_login_done() enters the multi-queue branch, but because
do_enquiry is now 0, it skips calling ibmvfc_channel_enquiry().
It also bypasses the fallback block that would normally set
IBMVFC_HOST_ACTION_QUERY and wake up vhost->work_wait_q:
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc-core.c:ibmvfc_npiv_login_done() {
if (ibmvfc_check_caps(vhost, IBMVFC_CAN_SUPPORT_CHANNELS)) {
if (ibmvfc_check_caps(vhost, IBMVFC_SUPPORT_SCSI))
vhost->do_scsi_login = 1;
if (ibmvfc_check_caps(vhost, IBMVFC_SUPPORT_NVMEOF))
vhost->do_nvme_login = 1;
if (vhost->do_enquiry)
ibmvfc_channel_enquiry(vhost);
} else {
vhost->do_enquiry = 0;
ibmvfc_set_host_action(vhost, IBMVFC_HOST_ACTION_QUERY);
wake_up(&vhost->work_wait_q);
}
}
Will this cause the initialization process to stall indefinitely in
IBMVFC_HOST_ACTION_INIT_WAIT?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261007-ibmvfc-fpin-support-v13-0-b816abfa4fcc@linux.ibm.com?part=10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-07 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-07 19:25 [PATCH v13 00/11] scsi: ibmvfc: make ibmvfc support FPIN messages Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-10-07 19:25 ` Dave Marquardt
2026-10-07 19:25 ` [PATCH v13 01/11] scsi: ibmvfc: fix IRQ leak and guard deregister on channel reg failure Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-10-07 19:25 ` Dave Marquardt
2026-10-07 19:25 ` [PATCH v13 02/11] scsi: ibmvfc: fix potential clobbering of rc after failed irq setup Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-10-07 19:25 ` Dave Marquardt
2026-10-07 19:25 ` [PATCH v13 03/11] scsi: ibmvfc: fix potential NULL pointer dereference on failed queue allocation Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-10-07 19:25 ` Dave Marquardt
2026-10-07 19:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-09 18:34 ` Dave Marquardt
2026-10-07 19:25 ` [PATCH v13 04/11] scsi: ibmvfc: add basic FPIN support Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-10-07 19:25 ` Dave Marquardt
2026-10-07 19:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 21:24 ` Dave Marquardt
2026-10-09 5:20 ` kernel test robot
2026-10-09 14:45 ` Dave Marquardt
2026-10-07 19:25 ` [PATCH v13 05/11] scsi: ibmvfc: add NOOP command support Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-10-07 19:25 ` Dave Marquardt
2026-10-07 19:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 19:24 ` Dave Marquardt
2026-10-07 19:25 ` [PATCH v13 06/11] scsi: ibmvfc: add FPIN extended flag and async sub-CRQ queue handle Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-10-07 19:25 ` Dave Marquardt
2026-10-07 19:25 ` [PATCH v13 07/11] scsi: ibmvfc: extend async event handlers for async sub-CRQ events Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-10-07 19:25 ` Dave Marquardt
2026-10-09 13:22 ` kernel test robot
2026-10-09 14:50 ` Dave Marquardt
2026-10-07 19:25 ` [PATCH v13 08/11] scsi: ibmvfc: add interrupt routine for asynchronous sub CRQ Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-10-07 19:25 ` Dave Marquardt
2026-10-07 19:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 19:44 ` Dave Marquardt
2026-10-07 19:25 ` [PATCH v13 09/11] scsi: ibmvfc: extend channel reg/dereg helpers for async sub-CRQ Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-10-07 19:25 ` Dave Marquardt
2026-10-07 19:25 ` [PATCH v13 10/11] scsi: ibmvfc: register and use asynchronous sub CRQ for events Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-10-07 19:25 ` Dave Marquardt
2026-10-07 19:42 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-07 19:25 ` [PATCH v13 11/11] scsi: ibmvfc: handle extended FPIN events Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-10-07 19:25 ` Dave Marquardt
2026-10-07 19:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-07 19:52 ` Dave Marquardt
2026-10-09 20:29 ` kernel test robot
2026-10-12 19:50 ` Dave Marquardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-163319@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=davemarq@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.