* Re: [PATCH] drm/msm/dpu: count the pending frame before kicking it off
[not found] <20261013145007.13111-1-me@michaelburch.net>
@ 2026-10-13 15:04 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-10-13 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Burch; +Cc: dri-devel
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] drm/msm/dpu: bandwidth leak due to missed frame_pending 0-transition in error path
--
commit 09d9db34ac4a7e898d02571dc93cd542a14a8979
Author: Michael Burch <me@michaelburch.net>
drm/msm/dpu: count the pending frame before kicking it off
This commit moves the increment of frame_pending in dpu_crtc_commit_kickoff()
to occur before kickoff to prevent event worker races. It also adds a rollback
decrement in the clone mode error path.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
> index 42d0a529b4d51..c8bd9c305a59a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1105,9 +1105,19 @@ void dpu_crtc_commit_kickoff(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> }
> }
>
> + /* The frame-done event may be handled before the kickoff below returns. */
> + if (atomic_inc_return(&dpu_crtc->frame_pending) == 1) {
> + /* acquire bandwidth and other resources */
> + DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("crtc%d first commit\n", crtc->base.id);
> + } else {
> + DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("crtc%d commit\n", crtc->base.id);
> + }
> +
> if (drm_crtc_in_clone_mode(crtc->state)) {
> - if (dpu_crtc_kickoff_clone_mode(crtc))
> + if (dpu_crtc_kickoff_clone_mode(crtc)) {
> + atomic_dec(&dpu_crtc->frame_pending);
[Severity: Medium]
Does this unconditional atomic_dec() bypass the 0-transition check required to
release CRTC bandwidth, causing a bandwidth leak?
If Frame N-1 is executing and Frame N is committed, dpu_crtc_commit_kickoff()
bumps frame_pending to 2. If dpu_crtc_kickoff_clone_mode() fails, it
decrements the count back.
If the hardware interrupt for Frame N-1 fires concurrently and its event worker
runs, it will decrement the count to 1, skipping the
dpu_core_perf_crtc_release_bw() call that requires a 1-to-0 transition.
The error path then blindly decrements the count to 0 with atomic_dec() and
also skips the dpu_core_perf_crtc_release_bw() call, permanently leaking the
allocated bandwidth until the CRTC is fully disabled.
> goto end;
> + }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261013145007.13111-1-me@michaelburch.net?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread