All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Javier Carrasco" <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/11] hwmon: chipcap2: fix off-by-one in command mode retry loop
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 18:01:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-171645@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014-chipcap2_locks-v3-2-27ebfc2c5b9e@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] hwmon: chipcap2: premature timeout due to 1-jiffy wait_for_completion_timeout
--

commit 529f4f489744495e9cdde8072b4894cc25895048
Author: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>

hwmon: chipcap2: fix off-by-one in command mode retry loop

i == CC2_CM_RETRIES can never be true inside the loop, since it
only runs while i < CC2_CM_RETRIES. Use CC2_CM_RETRIES - 1 so the
last failed retry breaks out immediately instead of doing a useless
disable + 80 ms power-cycle delay before the loop condition ends it
anyway.

> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/chipcap2.c b/drivers/hwmon/chipcap2.c
> index 8550578928523..8102b6851d3d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/chipcap2.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/chipcap2.c
> @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static int cc2_command_mode_start(struct cc2_data *data)
>  				     2 * CC2_RESP_START_CM_US);
>  		}
>  		ret = cc2_read_command_status(data->client);
> -		if (ret != -ETIMEDOUT || i == CC2_CM_RETRIES)
> +		if (ret != -ETIMEDOUT || i == CC2_CM_RETRIES - 1)

[Severity: High]
Can this still cause premature timeouts during device initialization and reads?

Looking at cc2_command_mode_start() just above this check, the timeout
calculation evaluates to exactly 1 jiffy on standard HZ configurations
(e.g., HZ=100 or HZ=250), because 200 microseconds is significantly less
than one tick:

	timeout = usecs_to_jiffies(2 * CC2_RESP_START_CM_US);
	ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&data->complete, timeout);

When a 1-jiffy timeout is passed to wait_for_completion_timeout(), it can
expire almost instantly if the next timer interrupt occurs immediately after
the call.

This can cause the driver to prematurely abort the device initialization
without triggering a retry, returning -ETIMEDOUT sporadically. This leads
to random failures in device communication and user-space reads even if
the device properly signals completion within its 100-microsecond window.

This same 1-jiffy timeout issue also affects the EEPROM read sequence in
cc2_read_reg():

	timeout = usecs_to_jiffies(2 * CC2_RESP_EEPROM_R_US);
	ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&data->complete, timeout);

>  			break;
>  
>  		/* command window missed, prepare for a retry */

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261014-chipcap2_locks-v3-0-27ebfc2c5b9e@gmail.com?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-14 18:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-14 17:33 [PATCH v3 00/11] hwmon: chipcap2: various bug fixes Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] hwmon: chipcap2: fix command error diagnostics Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 17:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] hwmon: chipcap2: fix off-by-one in command mode retry loop Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 18:01   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-14 20:11     ` Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] hwmon: chipcap2: fix be16 handling Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 18:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] hwmon: chipcap2: defer probe when IRQs are unavailable Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 18:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] hwmon: chipcap2: fix IRQ teardown ordering Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 18:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] hwmon: chipcap2: disable device after hwmon teardown Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 18:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] hwmon: chipcap2: enable IRQ processing when regulator is already enabled Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 18:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] hwmon: chipcap2: balance regulator state Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 18:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] hwmon: chipcap2: do not discard pending alarms on disable Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 18:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] hwmon: chipcap2: serialize access to the alarm indicators Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 18:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 17:34 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] hwmon: chipcap2: synchronize ready IRQ state Javier Carrasco
2026-10-14 18:41   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-171645@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.