* [PATCH] block: fix discard alignment for non-power-of-two granularities
@ 2026-10-26 0:05 Hungyu Lin
2026-10-26 0:22 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hungyu Lin @ 2026-10-26 0:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: axboe
Cc: linux-block, linux-kernel, dm-devel, mtsai, colyli, stable,
dennylin0707
bio_discard_limit() uses round_up() and round_down(), which require a
power-of-two alignment. However, discard_granularity need not be a power
of two. For example, dm-thin supports data block sizes that are arbitrary
multiples of 64 KiB and advertises the block size as its granularity.
With a 192 KiB granularity, discarding one complete block at offset
384 KiB is split into 128 KiB and 64 KiB bios. Neither covers a complete
thin block, so dm-thin ignores both and the mapping remains allocated.
Use sector_div() to find the distance to the next granularity boundary,
and rounddown() to align the maximum bio size. This handles non-power-of-
two granularities while preserving the alignment for power-of-two ones.
Fixes: 9b15d109a6b2 ("block: improve discard bio alignment in __blkdev_issue_discard()")
Reported-by: Ming-Hung Tsai <mtsai@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CALjSBEvjbiGDVewuapWKhGDtaxZwcn4=22raUiBEOyj22rY7-g@mail.gmail.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hungyu Lin <dennylin0707@gmail.com>
---
block/blk-lib.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c
index 688bc67cbf73..e0de5bb4d969 100644
--- a/block/blk-lib.c
+++ b/block/blk-lib.c
@@ -13,26 +13,25 @@
static sector_t bio_discard_limit(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector)
{
unsigned int discard_granularity = bdev_discard_granularity(bdev);
- sector_t granularity_aligned_sector;
+ unsigned int remainder;
if (bdev_is_partition(bdev))
sector += bdev->bd_start_sect;
- granularity_aligned_sector =
- round_up(sector, discard_granularity >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
+ remainder = sector_div(sector, discard_granularity >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
/*
* Make sure subsequent bios start aligned to the discard granularity if
* it needs to be split.
*/
- if (granularity_aligned_sector != sector)
- return granularity_aligned_sector - sector;
+ if (remainder)
+ return (discard_granularity >> SECTOR_SHIFT) - remainder;
/*
* Align the bio size to the discard granularity to make splitting the bio
* at discard granularity boundaries easier in the driver if needed.
*/
- return round_down(BIO_MAX_SIZE, discard_granularity) >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
+ return rounddown(BIO_MAX_SIZE, discard_granularity) >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
}
struct bio *blk_alloc_discard_bio(struct block_device *bdev,
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] block: fix discard alignment for non-power-of-two granularities
2026-10-26 0:05 [PATCH] block: fix discard alignment for non-power-of-two granularities Hungyu Lin
@ 2026-10-26 0:22 ` sashiko-bot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-10-26 0:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hungyu Lin, axboe; +Cc: dm-devel, mtsai, colyli
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] block: divide-by-zero in bio_discard_limit() when discard_granularity is 0
--
commit c2a5682afd9058576d36c11b303c1f6073d6bfa9
Author: Hungyu Lin <dennylin0707@gmail.com>
block: fix discard alignment for non-power-of-two granularities
This commit replaces round_up() and round_down() in bio_discard_limit()
with sector_div() and rounddown() to properly align discard bios when
discard_granularity is not a power of two.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CALjSBEvjbiGDVewuapWKhGDtaxZwcn4=22raUiBEOyj22rY7-g@mail.gmail.com
> diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c
> index 688bc67cbf733..e0de5bb4d969e 100644
> --- a/block/blk-lib.c
> +++ b/block/blk-lib.c
> @@ -13,26 +13,25 @@
> static sector_t bio_discard_limit(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector)
> {
> unsigned int discard_granularity = bdev_discard_granularity(bdev);
> - sector_t granularity_aligned_sector;
> + unsigned int remainder;
>
> if (bdev_is_partition(bdev))
> sector += bdev->bd_start_sect;
>
> - granularity_aligned_sector =
> - round_up(sector, discard_granularity >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
> + remainder = sector_div(sector, discard_granularity >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
>
> /*
> * Make sure subsequent bios start aligned to the discard granularity if
> * it needs to be split.
> */
> - if (granularity_aligned_sector != sector)
> - return granularity_aligned_sector - sector;
> + if (remainder)
> + return (discard_granularity >> SECTOR_SHIFT) - remainder;
>
> /*
> * Align the bio size to the discard granularity to make splitting the bio
> * at discard granularity boundaries easier in the driver if needed.
> */
> - return round_down(BIO_MAX_SIZE, discard_granularity) >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> + return rounddown(BIO_MAX_SIZE, discard_granularity) >> SECTOR_SHIFT;
> }
[Severity: Critical]
Can this trigger a divide-by-zero when discard_granularity is 0?
When a block device does not support discard or has discard disabled via
sysfs, blk_validate_limits() in block/blk-settings.c explicitly sets
discard_granularity to 0:
if (lim->max_discard_sectors)
lim->discard_granularity =
max(lim->discard_granularity, lim->physical_block_size);
else
lim->discard_granularity = 0;
Since commit 094259204578 ("block: remove the discard_granularity check
in __blkdev_issue_discard") and commit 30f1e7241422 ("block: move discard
checks into the ioctl handler"), neither blkdev_issue_discard(),
__blkdev_issue_discard(), nor blk_alloc_discard_bio() checks
bdev_max_discard_sectors(bdev) or bdev_discard_granularity(bdev) before
calling bio_discard_limit(bdev, *sector):
block/blk-lib.c:blk_alloc_discard_bio() {
sector_t bio_sects = min(*nr_sects, bio_discard_limit(bdev, *sector));
...
}
Instead, they rely on submit_bio_noacct() -> blk_check_bio() in
block/blk-core.c to reject unsupported REQ_OP_DISCARD bios with
BLK_STS_NOTSUPP.
Several callers can reach blk_alloc_discard_bio() on a device with
discard_granularity == 0, such as:
- Callers that do not pre-check bdev_max_discard_sectors(), for example
hpfs_ioctl() -> hpfs_trim_fs() -> do_trim() -> sb_issue_discard(),
nvmet_bdev_execute_discard() -> __blkdev_issue_discard(),
fat_free_clusters() / fat_trim_fs() when mounted with -o discard,
nilfs_discard_segments(), jfs_issue_discard(), __ext4_remount() with
-o remount,discard, f2fs_secure_erase(), Xen dispatch_discard_io(),
r5l_write_super_and_discard_space(), and fd_execute_unmap().
- Any discard caller (such as blk_ioctl_discard(), blkdev_cmd_discard(),
or active filesystem/swap discard) racing with runtime discard
disablement when 0 is written to discard_max_bytes via
queue_max_discard_sectors_store().
Previously, round_up(sector, 0) and round_down(BIO_MAX_SIZE, 0) used
bitwise masks and did not trap. With sector_div() and rounddown(), a zero
discard_granularity divides by zero.
Should discard_granularity be guarded here (similar to
max(lim->discard_granularity >> 9, 1U) in __bio_split_discard()), or
should bio_discard_limit() / blk_alloc_discard_bio() handle
discard_granularity == 0 before dividing?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261026000511.73371-1-dennylin0707@gmail.com?part=1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-26 0:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-26 0:05 [PATCH] block: fix discard alignment for non-power-of-two granularities Hungyu Lin
2026-10-26 0:22 ` sashiko-bot
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.