* [PATCH v2 0/2] mm/kasan: Detect double-free involving kfree_rcu_sheaf().
@ 2026-10-27 22:25 Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-27 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-27 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/kasan/kunit: Add double-free tests " Kuniyuki Iwashima
0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima @ 2026-10-27 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrey Ryabinin, Andrew Morton, Vlastimil Babka, Harry Yoo
Cc: Alexander Potapenko, Andrey Konovalov, Dmitry Vyukov,
Vincenzo Frascino, Hao Li, Christoph Lameter, David Rientjes,
Roman Gushchin, kasan-dev, linux-mm, Kuniyuki Iwashima
Recently, syzbot has reported several weird use-after-free splats.
What they have in common is that "Freed by" points to rcu_free_sheaf(),
whereas the object shown in "Call Trace:" and "Allocated by" is never
supposed to be freed via kfree_rcu().
This means the object was a victim of a double-free somewhere else and
was silently poisoned by rcu_free_sheaf() after being reallocated.
This happens because kfree_rcu_sheaf() queues an object into the RCU
sheaf without invoking any KASAN hooks.
This series enables KASAN to detect double-free involving
kfree_rcu_sheaf() immediately and adds KUnit tests for it.
Changes:
v2:
* Patch 1
* Collect Vlastimil and Alexander tags
* Add Fixes tag
* Add kdoc for @after_rcu_delay of kasan_slab_pre_free()
* Rename s/kasan_record_aux_stack_rcu/kasan_mark_rcu_free_pending/g
* Add comment for __kasan_record_aux_stack()
* Patch 2
* Move kasan_byte_accessible() check and
kvfree_rcu_barrier_on_cache() after switch
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20261009214639.2878857-1-kuniyu@google.com/
Kuniyuki Iwashima (2):
mm/kasan: Detect double-free involving kfree_rcu_sheaf().
mm/kasan/kunit: Add double-free tests involving kfree_rcu_sheaf().
include/linux/kasan.h | 15 +++--
mm/kasan/common.c | 13 ++--
mm/kasan/generic.c | 17 ++++-
mm/kasan/kasan.h | 34 +++++++++-
mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/slub.c | 13 +++-
6 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--
2.56.0.307.g5fe7bd680c-goog
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/kasan: Detect double-free involving kfree_rcu_sheaf().
2026-10-27 22:25 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm/kasan: Detect double-free involving kfree_rcu_sheaf() Kuniyuki Iwashima
@ 2026-10-27 22:25 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-28 16:22 ` Alexander Potapenko
2026-10-28 18:13 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2026-10-27 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/kasan/kunit: Add double-free tests " Kuniyuki Iwashima
1 sibling, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima @ 2026-10-27 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrey Ryabinin, Andrew Morton, Vlastimil Babka, Harry Yoo
Cc: Alexander Potapenko, Andrey Konovalov, Dmitry Vyukov,
Vincenzo Frascino, Hao Li, Christoph Lameter, David Rientjes,
Roman Gushchin, kasan-dev, linux-mm, Kuniyuki Iwashima
syzbot reported a weird use-after-free splat. [0]
In the report, an object in the kmalloc-64 cache was freed via
rcu_free_sheaf() while it was still in use, even though the
object should always be freed with kfree() (in xfrm_hash_free()),
implying that the object was a victim of a double-free involving
kfree_rcu() somewhere else.
When kvfree_call_rcu() frees an object via kfree_rcu_sheaf() and
queues it into pcs->rcu_free, debug facilities are skipped, e.g.,
kasan_slab_pre_free(), kasan_record_aux_stack(),
debug_rcu_head_queue(), etc.
As a result, KASAN cannot detect the double-free at the call site.
If the object is still in the KASAN quarantine when the sheaf is
flushed, KASAN can detect the double-free in rcu_free_sheaf(), but
with no trace of the suspect.
Worse yet, once the object is evicted from the quarantine and
reallocated before the sheaf is flushed, rcu_free_sheaf() silently
poisons the live object, resulting in a false-positive use-after-free
report on the new user.
If __kfree_rcu_sheaf() simply calls kasan_slab_pre_free(), we
can detect the second kfree_rcu(), but only while the object is
poisoned in the KASAN quarantine after the first free:
kfree() --(poisoned)--------------------> kfree_rcu()
kfree_rcu() -> rcu_free_sheaf() -(poisoned)-> kfree_rcu()
An object queued in pcs->rcu_free remains unpoisoned until the
sheaf becomes full and rcu_free_sheaf() runs after the RCU
grace period, so a subsequent kfree_rcu() or kfree() before
rcu_free_sheaf() cannot be detected by shadow bytes alone:
kfree_rcu() -(unpoisoned)-> kfree_rcu() -> rcu_free_sheaf() (too late!)
kfree_rcu() -(unpoisoned)-> kfree() -> rcu_free_sheaf() (too late!)
These cases can be detected if we call debug_rcu_head_queue()
before kfree_rcu_sheaf(), but ODEBUG splat only shows the second
free.
To detect these cases with KASAN, we just need a 1-bit flag
to indicate the state, which can reuse an unused bit in struct
kasan_track.pid. (PID_MAX_LIMIT is 1<<22)
The bit is marked along with recording the stack trace when
deferring slab frees in kfree_rcu_sheaf() and checked in
check_slab_allocation() so that any double-free pattern above
can be detected immediately.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6ac959ee.70ed5d86.2ac85.007d.GAE@google.com/ #[0]
Fixes: ec66e0d59952 ("slab: add sheaf support for batching kfree_rcu() operations")
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
---
v2:
* Add Fixes tag
* Add kdoc for @after_rcu_delay of kasan_slab_pre_free()
* Rename s/kasan_record_aux_stack_rcu/kasan_mark_rcu_free_pending/g
* Add comment for __kasan_record_aux_stack()
---
include/linux/kasan.h | 15 +++++++++++----
mm/kasan/common.c | 13 ++++++++-----
mm/kasan/generic.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
mm/kasan/kasan.h | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
mm/slub.c | 13 ++++++++++---
5 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/kasan.h b/include/linux/kasan.h
index bf233bde68c7..c1ac7971601e 100644
--- a/include/linux/kasan.h
+++ b/include/linux/kasan.h
@@ -180,10 +180,12 @@ static __always_inline void * __must_check kasan_init_slab_obj(
}
bool __kasan_slab_pre_free(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
- unsigned long ip);
+ unsigned long ip, bool after_rcu_delay);
/**
* kasan_slab_pre_free - Check whether freeing a slab object is safe.
+ * @s: Cache the object belongs to.
* @object: Object to be freed.
+ * @after_rcu_delay: Whether the free follows an RCU grace period.
*
* This function checks whether freeing the given object is safe. It may
* check for double-free and invalid-free bugs and report them.
@@ -193,10 +195,12 @@ bool __kasan_slab_pre_free(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
* @Return true if freeing the object is unsafe; false otherwise.
*/
static __always_inline bool kasan_slab_pre_free(struct kmem_cache *s,
- void *object)
+ void *object,
+ bool after_rcu_delay)
{
if (kasan_enabled())
- return __kasan_slab_pre_free(s, object, _RET_IP_);
+ return __kasan_slab_pre_free(s, object, _RET_IP_,
+ after_rcu_delay);
return false;
}
@@ -424,7 +428,8 @@ static inline void *kasan_init_slab_obj(struct kmem_cache *cache,
return (void *)object;
}
-static inline bool kasan_slab_pre_free(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object)
+static inline bool kasan_slab_pre_free(struct kmem_cache *s, void *object,
+ bool after_rcu_delay)
{
return false;
}
@@ -495,6 +500,7 @@ void kasan_cache_create(struct kmem_cache *cache, unsigned int *size,
void kasan_cache_shrink(struct kmem_cache *cache);
void kasan_cache_shutdown(struct kmem_cache *cache);
void kasan_record_aux_stack(void *ptr);
+void kasan_mark_rcu_free_pending(void *ptr);
#else /* CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC */
@@ -512,6 +518,7 @@ static inline void kasan_cache_create(struct kmem_cache *cache,
static inline void kasan_cache_shrink(struct kmem_cache *cache) {}
static inline void kasan_cache_shutdown(struct kmem_cache *cache) {}
static inline void kasan_record_aux_stack(void *ptr) {}
+static inline void kasan_mark_rcu_free_pending(void *ptr) {}
#endif /* CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC */
diff --git a/mm/kasan/common.c b/mm/kasan/common.c
index 7d21c4db68d2..4187606a88cf 100644
--- a/mm/kasan/common.c
+++ b/mm/kasan/common.c
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ void kasan_set_track(struct kasan_track *track, depot_stack_handle_t stack)
track->timestamp = ts_nsec >> 9;
#endif /* CONFIG_KASAN_EXTRA_INFO */
track->pid = current->pid;
+ track->rcu_free = 0;
track->stack = stack;
}
@@ -231,7 +232,7 @@ void * __must_check __kasan_init_slab_obj(struct kmem_cache *cache,
/* Returns true when freeing the object is not safe. */
static bool check_slab_allocation(struct kmem_cache *cache, void *object,
- unsigned long ip)
+ unsigned long ip, bool after_rcu_delay)
{
void *tagged_object = object;
@@ -242,7 +243,8 @@ static bool check_slab_allocation(struct kmem_cache *cache, void *object,
return true;
}
- if (!kasan_byte_accessible(tagged_object)) {
+ if (!kasan_byte_accessible(tagged_object) ||
+ kasan_check_rcu_free(cache, object, after_rcu_delay)) {
kasan_report_invalid_free(tagged_object, ip, KASAN_REPORT_DOUBLE_FREE);
return true;
}
@@ -259,17 +261,18 @@ static inline void poison_slab_object(struct kmem_cache *cache, void *object,
kasan_poison(object, round_up(cache->object_size, KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE),
KASAN_SLAB_FREE, init);
+ kasan_clear_rcu_free(cache, object);
if (kasan_stack_collection_enabled())
kasan_save_free_info(cache, tagged_object);
}
bool __kasan_slab_pre_free(struct kmem_cache *cache, void *object,
- unsigned long ip)
+ unsigned long ip, bool after_rcu_delay)
{
if (is_kfence_address(object))
return false;
- return check_slab_allocation(cache, object, ip);
+ return check_slab_allocation(cache, object, ip, after_rcu_delay);
}
bool __kasan_slab_free(struct kmem_cache *cache, void *object, bool init,
@@ -544,7 +547,7 @@ bool __kasan_mempool_poison_object(void *ptr, unsigned long ip)
slab = page_slab(page);
- if (check_slab_allocation(slab->slab_cache, ptr, ip))
+ if (check_slab_allocation(slab->slab_cache, ptr, ip, false))
return false;
poison_slab_object(slab->slab_cache, ptr, false);
diff --git a/mm/kasan/generic.c b/mm/kasan/generic.c
index 2b8e73f5f6a7..3532a41ce966 100644
--- a/mm/kasan/generic.c
+++ b/mm/kasan/generic.c
@@ -533,10 +533,13 @@ size_t kasan_metadata_size(struct kmem_cache *cache, bool in_object)
}
/*
+ * Records an auxiliary stack trace for the object at @addr and, if @rcu_free
+ * is set, marks the object as pending an RCU-delayed free.
+ *
* This function avoids dynamic memory allocations and thus can be called from
* contexts that do not allow allocating memory.
*/
-void kasan_record_aux_stack(void *addr)
+static void __kasan_record_aux_stack(void *addr, bool rcu_free)
{
struct slab *slab = kasan_addr_to_slab(addr);
struct kmem_cache *cache;
@@ -552,10 +555,22 @@ void kasan_record_aux_stack(void *addr)
if (!alloc_meta)
return;
+ if (rcu_free)
+ alloc_meta->alloc_track.rcu_free = 1;
alloc_meta->aux_stack[1] = alloc_meta->aux_stack[0];
alloc_meta->aux_stack[0] = kasan_save_stack(0, 0);
}
+void kasan_record_aux_stack(void *addr)
+{
+ __kasan_record_aux_stack(addr, false);
+}
+
+void kasan_mark_rcu_free_pending(void *addr)
+{
+ __kasan_record_aux_stack(addr, true);
+}
+
void kasan_save_alloc_info(struct kmem_cache *cache, void *object, gfp_t flags)
{
struct kasan_alloc_meta *alloc_meta;
diff --git a/mm/kasan/kasan.h b/mm/kasan/kasan.h
index fc9169a54766..43d608899544 100644
--- a/mm/kasan/kasan.h
+++ b/mm/kasan/kasan.h
@@ -191,7 +191,10 @@ static inline bool kasan_requires_meta(void)
#define KASAN_STACK_DEPTH 64
struct kasan_track {
- u32 pid;
+#define KASAN_PID_BITS const_ilog2(PID_MAX_LIMIT)
+ u32 pid:KASAN_PID_BITS;
+ u32 rcu_free:1;
+ u32 unused:32 - (KASAN_PID_BITS + 1);
depot_stack_handle_t stack;
#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_EXTRA_INFO
u64 cpu:20;
@@ -390,8 +393,37 @@ struct kasan_alloc_meta *kasan_get_alloc_meta(struct kmem_cache *cache,
struct kasan_free_meta *kasan_get_free_meta(struct kmem_cache *cache,
const void *object);
void kasan_init_object_meta(struct kmem_cache *cache, const void *object);
+
+static inline bool kasan_check_rcu_free(struct kmem_cache *cache,
+ const void *object,
+ bool after_rcu_delay)
+{
+ struct kasan_alloc_meta *alloc_meta;
+
+ alloc_meta = kasan_get_alloc_meta(cache, object);
+ if (!alloc_meta)
+ return false;
+
+ return alloc_meta->alloc_track.rcu_free != after_rcu_delay;
+}
+
+static inline void kasan_clear_rcu_free(struct kmem_cache *cache,
+ const void *object)
+{
+ struct kasan_alloc_meta *alloc_meta;
+
+ alloc_meta = kasan_get_alloc_meta(cache, object);
+ if (alloc_meta)
+ alloc_meta->alloc_track.rcu_free = 0;
+}
#else
static inline void kasan_init_object_meta(struct kmem_cache *cache, const void *object) { }
+static inline bool kasan_check_rcu_free(struct kmem_cache *cache, const void *object,
+ bool after_rcu_delay)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+static inline void kasan_clear_rcu_free(struct kmem_cache *cache, const void *object) { }
#endif
depot_stack_handle_t kasan_save_stack(gfp_t flags, depot_flags_t depot_flags);
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 45e077c7526c..cbc51440b3d9 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2722,7 +2722,7 @@ bool slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, void *x, bool init,
* Give KASAN a chance to notice an invalid free operation before we
* modify the object.
*/
- if (kasan_slab_pre_free(s, x))
+ if (kasan_slab_pre_free(s, x, after_rcu_delay))
return false;
#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_RCU_DEBUG
@@ -2738,7 +2738,7 @@ bool slab_free_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, void *x, bool init,
* We have to do this manually because the rcu_head is
* not located inside the object.
*/
- kasan_record_aux_stack(x);
+ kasan_mark_rcu_free_pending(x);
delayed_free->object = x;
call_rcu(&delayed_free->head, slab_free_after_rcu_debug);
@@ -6298,6 +6298,12 @@ bool __kfree_rcu_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, void *obj, unsigned int free_flags)
}
do_free:
+ if (unlikely(kasan_slab_pre_free(s, obj, false))) {
+ local_unlock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ kasan_mark_rcu_free_pending(obj);
rcu_sheaf = pcs->rcu_free;
@@ -6338,6 +6344,7 @@ bool __kfree_rcu_sheaf(struct kmem_cache *s, void *obj, unsigned int free_flags)
local_unlock(&s->cpu_sheaves->lock);
stat(s, FREE_RCU_SHEAF);
+out:
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
lock_map_release(&kfree_rcu_sheaf_map);
return true;
@@ -6971,7 +6978,7 @@ void kfree_nolock(const void *object)
* -> kfree_nolock() -> kasan_report_invalid_free() on the same CPU
* is double buggy and deserves to deadlock.
*/
- if (kasan_slab_pre_free(s, x))
+ if (kasan_slab_pre_free(s, x, false))
return;
/*
* memcg, kasan_slab_pre_free are done for 'x'.
--
2.56.0.307.g5fe7bd680c-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/kasan/kunit: Add double-free tests involving kfree_rcu_sheaf().
2026-10-27 22:25 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm/kasan: Detect double-free involving kfree_rcu_sheaf() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-27 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Kuniyuki Iwashima
@ 2026-10-27 22:25 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-28 16:23 ` Alexander Potapenko
` (2 more replies)
1 sibling, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima @ 2026-10-27 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrey Ryabinin, Andrew Morton, Vlastimil Babka, Harry Yoo
Cc: Alexander Potapenko, Andrey Konovalov, Dmitry Vyukov,
Vincenzo Frascino, Hao Li, Christoph Lameter, David Rientjes,
Roman Gushchin, kasan-dev, linux-mm, Kuniyuki Iwashima
The new test cases verify that KASAN immediately detects all
three combinations of double-free involving kfree_rcu_sheaf():
1. kmem_cache_free() -> kfree_rcu()
2. kfree_rcu() -> kmem_cache_free()
3. kfree_rcu() -> kfree_rcu()
Each test also evicts the object from the KASAN quarantine and
reallocates it as a victim object before flushing the RCU sheaf
to ensure the live victim object is not poisoned by the rejected
double-free.
Without the patch, all tests fail to detect the 2nd free, and
the victim is poisoned:
# kmem_cache_double_free_rcu_1: EXPECTATION FAILED at mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c:1096
KASAN failure expected in "kfree_rcu(p, rcu)", but none occurred
... <splat below is logged here>
# kmem_cache_double_free_rcu_1: EXPECTATION FAILED at mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c:1156
Expected (<...snipped READ_ONCE()...>&(victim->i)); }) == 42, but
<...snipped READ_ONCE()...>victim->i == 117729280 (0x7046800)
# kasan: pass:0 fail:3 skip:0 total:3
# Totals: pass:0 fail:3 skip:0 total:3
not ok 1 kasan
In all cases, KASAN logs a false-positive use-after-free splat at
READ_ONCE(victim->i), and it has no information about the suspect;
the two stack traces ("Call Trace:" and "Allocated by") are of the
live victim, and "Freed by" is of the RCU task.
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __kmem_cache_double_free_rcu+0x9ee/0xaf0
Read of size 4 at addr ffff8881076c2938 by task kunit_try_catch/513
...
Freed by task 0:
...
__rcu_free_sheaf_prepare+0xf6/0x240
rcu_free_sheaf_nobarn+0x31/0xe0
rcu_core+0x75e/0x16b0
With the patch, all tests can detect the 2nd free immediately and
prevent the victim from being poisoned:
# kasan: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
# Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
ok 1 kasan
All the stack traces point to the same object for double-free,
and the two free traces are shown in "Call Trace:" and "Freed by"
(or "Last potentially related work creation:" in the 2nd/3rd test
cases).
BUG: KASAN: double-free in kvfree_call_rcu+0xb6/0x3c0
Free of addr ffff888108495938 by task kunit_try_catch/511
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
...
check_slab_allocation+0x10d/0x120
__kfree_rcu_sheaf+0x1c/0x2d0
kvfree_call_rcu+0xb6/0x3c0
__kmem_cache_double_free_rcu+0x310/0xaf0
Allocated by task 511:
...
kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x14f/0x3c0
__kmem_cache_double_free_rcu+0x152/0xaf0
Freed by task 511:
...
kmem_cache_free+0x14f/0x3c0
__kmem_cache_double_free_rcu+0x2c6/0xaf0
Notably, in the 2nd/3rd test cases, we can detect the 2nd free
before the object is poisoned:
Memory state around the buggy address:
ffff888106dc7800: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
ffff888106dc7880: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
>ffff888106dc7900: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc 00 00 00 fc fc fc fc fc fc
^
...
ok 2 kmem_cache_double_free_rcu_2
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
---
v2: Move kasan_byte_accessible() check and
kvfree_rcu_barrier_on_cache() after switch
---
mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 134 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c b/mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c
index b9e167ed5be3..83c418c0ef87 100644
--- a/mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c
+++ b/mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
#include <asm/page.h>
#include "kasan.h"
+#include "../slab.h"
#define OOB_TAG_OFF (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC) ? 0 : KASAN_GRANULE_SIZE)
@@ -1070,6 +1071,134 @@ static void kmem_cache_double_free(struct kunit *test)
kmem_cache_destroy(cache);
}
+#ifndef MODULE
+static void __kmem_cache_double_free_rcu(struct kunit *test, int mode)
+{
+ struct kasan_rcu_info *p, *victim = NULL, **objs;
+ struct kmem_cache *cache;
+ int i, n = 0;
+
+ KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_ON(test, CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC);
+
+ cache = kmem_cache_create("test_cache", sizeof(*p), 0, SLAB_NO_MERGE,
+ NULL);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, cache);
+
+ if (!cache->sheaf_capacity) {
+ kmem_cache_destroy(cache);
+ kunit_skip(test, "Test requires sheaves");
+ }
+
+ objs = kunit_kcalloc(test, cache->sheaf_capacity * 2, sizeof(*objs),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!objs) {
+ kunit_err(test, "Allocation failed: %s\n", __func__);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ p = kmem_cache_alloc(cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!p) {
+ kunit_err(test, "Allocation failed: %s\n", __func__);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ switch (mode) {
+ case 1:
+ kmem_cache_free(cache, p);
+ /* p is already in quarantine. */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, kfree_rcu(p, rcu));
+ break;
+ case 2:
+ /* The actual free order is inverse. */
+ kfree_rcu(p, rcu);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, kmem_cache_free(cache, p));
+ break;
+ case 3:
+ migrate_disable();
+ kfree_rcu(p, rcu);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < cache->sheaf_capacity - 1; i++) {
+ objs[i] = kmem_cache_alloc(cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+ kfree_rcu(objs[i], rcu);
+ }
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, kfree_rcu(p, rcu));
+ migrate_enable();
+
+ /*
+ * Move the 1st full sheaf to quarantine, keeping the
+ * 2nd in pcs->rcu_free.
+ */
+ rcu_barrier();
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Move p to quarantine if not poisoned yet (case 2,
+ * or fallback in case 3).
+ */
+ if (kasan_byte_accessible(p))
+ kvfree_rcu_barrier_on_cache(cache);
+
+ /*
+ * Evict p from quarantine and reallocate it as a live victim object
+ * before the RCU sheaf is flushed.
+ */
+ kasan_quarantine_remove_cache(cache);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < cache->sheaf_capacity * 2; i++) {
+ objs[n] = kmem_cache_alloc(cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!objs[n])
+ break;
+ if (objs[n] == p) {
+ victim = objs[n];
+ break;
+ }
+ n++;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
+ kmem_cache_free(cache, objs[i]);
+
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, victim, p);
+ if (victim != p)
+ goto out;
+
+ WRITE_ONCE(victim->i, 42);
+
+ /*
+ * If kfree_rcu() failed to reject the double-free above,
+ * flushing the RCU sheaf will silently poison the live
+ * victim and cause a false-positive UAF on victim->i.
+ */
+ kvfree_rcu_barrier_on_cache(cache);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, READ_ONCE(victim->i), 42);
+
+ if (!READ_ONCE(test_status.report_found))
+ kmem_cache_free(cache, victim);
+out:
+ kmem_cache_destroy(cache);
+}
+
+static void kmem_cache_double_free_rcu_1(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ /* kmem_cache_free() -> kfree_rcu() */
+ __kmem_cache_double_free_rcu(test, 1);
+}
+
+static void kmem_cache_double_free_rcu_2(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ /* kfree_rcu() -> kmem_cache_free() */
+ __kmem_cache_double_free_rcu(test, 2);
+}
+
+static void kmem_cache_double_free_rcu_3(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ /* kfree_rcu() -> kfree_rcu() */
+ __kmem_cache_double_free_rcu(test, 3);
+}
+#endif
+
static void kmem_cache_invalid_free(struct kunit *test)
{
char *p;
@@ -2239,6 +2368,11 @@ static struct kunit_case kasan_kunit_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(kfree_via_phys),
KUNIT_CASE(kmem_cache_oob),
KUNIT_CASE(kmem_cache_double_free),
+#ifndef MODULE
+ KUNIT_CASE(kmem_cache_double_free_rcu_1),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kmem_cache_double_free_rcu_2),
+ KUNIT_CASE(kmem_cache_double_free_rcu_3),
+#endif
KUNIT_CASE(kmem_cache_invalid_free),
KUNIT_CASE(kmem_cache_rcu_uaf),
KUNIT_CASE(kmem_cache_rcu_reuse),
--
2.56.0.307.g5fe7bd680c-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/kasan: Detect double-free involving kfree_rcu_sheaf().
2026-10-27 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Kuniyuki Iwashima
@ 2026-10-28 16:22 ` Alexander Potapenko
2026-10-28 18:13 ` Andrey Ryabinin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Potapenko @ 2026-10-28 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin, Andrew Morton, Vlastimil Babka, Harry Yoo,
Andrey Konovalov, Dmitry Vyukov, Vincenzo Frascino, Hao Li,
Christoph Lameter, David Rientjes, Roman Gushchin, kasan-dev,
linux-mm
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6ac959ee.70ed5d86.2ac85.007d.GAE@google.com/ #[0]
> Fixes: ec66e0d59952 ("slab: add sheaf support for batching kfree_rcu() operations")
> Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
> Tested-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/kasan/kunit: Add double-free tests involving kfree_rcu_sheaf().
2026-10-27 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/kasan/kunit: Add double-free tests " Kuniyuki Iwashima
@ 2026-10-28 16:23 ` Alexander Potapenko
2026-10-28 19:10 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2026-10-28 22:26 ` sashiko-bot
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Potapenko @ 2026-10-28 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin, Andrew Morton, Vlastimil Babka, Harry Yoo,
Andrey Konovalov, Dmitry Vyukov, Vincenzo Frascino, Hao Li,
Christoph Lameter, David Rientjes, Roman Gushchin, kasan-dev,
linux-mm
> Memory state around the buggy address:
> ffff888106dc7800: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
> ffff888106dc7880: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
> >ffff888106dc7900: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc 00 00 00 fc fc fc fc fc fc
> ^
> ...
> ok 2 kmem_cache_double_free_rcu_2
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm/kasan: Detect double-free involving kfree_rcu_sheaf().
2026-10-27 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-28 16:22 ` Alexander Potapenko
@ 2026-10-28 18:13 ` Andrey Ryabinin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrey Ryabinin @ 2026-10-28 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima, Andrew Morton, Vlastimil Babka, Harry Yoo
Cc: Alexander Potapenko, Andrey Konovalov, Dmitry Vyukov,
Vincenzo Frascino, Hao Li, Christoph Lameter, David Rientjes,
Roman Gushchin, kasan-dev, linux-mm
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com> writes:
> syzbot reported a weird use-after-free splat. [0]
>
> In the report, an object in the kmalloc-64 cache was freed via
> rcu_free_sheaf() while it was still in use, even though the
> object should always be freed with kfree() (in xfrm_hash_free()),
> implying that the object was a victim of a double-free involving
> kfree_rcu() somewhere else.
>
> When kvfree_call_rcu() frees an object via kfree_rcu_sheaf() and
> queues it into pcs->rcu_free, debug facilities are skipped, e.g.,
> kasan_slab_pre_free(), kasan_record_aux_stack(),
> debug_rcu_head_queue(), etc.
>
> As a result, KASAN cannot detect the double-free at the call site.
>
> If the object is still in the KASAN quarantine when the sheaf is
> flushed, KASAN can detect the double-free in rcu_free_sheaf(), but
> with no trace of the suspect.
>
> Worse yet, once the object is evicted from the quarantine and
> reallocated before the sheaf is flushed, rcu_free_sheaf() silently
> poisons the live object, resulting in a false-positive use-after-free
> report on the new user.
>
> If __kfree_rcu_sheaf() simply calls kasan_slab_pre_free(), we
> can detect the second kfree_rcu(), but only while the object is
> poisoned in the KASAN quarantine after the first free:
>
> kfree() --(poisoned)--------------------> kfree_rcu()
> kfree_rcu() -> rcu_free_sheaf() -(poisoned)-> kfree_rcu()
>
> An object queued in pcs->rcu_free remains unpoisoned until the
> sheaf becomes full and rcu_free_sheaf() runs after the RCU
> grace period, so a subsequent kfree_rcu() or kfree() before
> rcu_free_sheaf() cannot be detected by shadow bytes alone:
>
> kfree_rcu() -(unpoisoned)-> kfree_rcu() -> rcu_free_sheaf() (too late!)
> kfree_rcu() -(unpoisoned)-> kfree() -> rcu_free_sheaf() (too late!)
>
> These cases can be detected if we call debug_rcu_head_queue()
> before kfree_rcu_sheaf(), but ODEBUG splat only shows the second
> free.
>
> To detect these cases with KASAN, we just need a 1-bit flag
> to indicate the state, which can reuse an unused bit in struct
> kasan_track.pid. (PID_MAX_LIMIT is 1<<22)
>
> The bit is marked along with recording the stack trace when
> deferring slab frees in kfree_rcu_sheaf() and checked in
> check_slab_allocation() so that any double-free pattern above
> can be detected immediately.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6ac959ee.70ed5d86.2ac85.007d.GAE@google.com/ #[0]
> Fixes: ec66e0d59952 ("slab: add sheaf support for batching kfree_rcu() operations")
> Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka (SUSE) <vbabka@kernel.org>
> Tested-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/kasan/kunit: Add double-free tests involving kfree_rcu_sheaf().
2026-10-27 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/kasan/kunit: Add double-free tests " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-28 16:23 ` Alexander Potapenko
@ 2026-10-28 19:10 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2026-10-28 19:24 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-28 22:26 ` sashiko-bot
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrey Ryabinin @ 2026-10-28 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima, Andrew Morton, Vlastimil Babka, Harry Yoo
Cc: Alexander Potapenko, Andrey Konovalov, Dmitry Vyukov,
Vincenzo Frascino, Hao Li, Christoph Lameter, David Rientjes,
Roman Gushchin, kasan-dev, linux-mm
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com> writes:
>
> +#ifndef MODULE
> +static void __kmem_cache_double_free_rcu(struct kunit *test, int mode)
> +{
> + struct kasan_rcu_info *p, *victim = NULL, **objs;
> + struct kmem_cache *cache;
> + int i, n = 0;
> +
> + KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_ON(test, CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC);
> +
> + cache = kmem_cache_create("test_cache", sizeof(*p), 0, SLAB_NO_MERGE,
> + NULL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, cache);
> +
> + if (!cache->sheaf_capacity) {
> + kmem_cache_destroy(cache);
> + kunit_skip(test, "Test requires sheaves");
> + }
> +
> + objs = kunit_kcalloc(test, cache->sheaf_capacity * 2, sizeof(*objs),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!objs) {
> + kunit_err(test, "Allocation failed: %s\n", __func__);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + p = kmem_cache_alloc(cache, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!p) {
> + kunit_err(test, "Allocation failed: %s\n", __func__);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + switch (mode) {
> + case 1:
> + kmem_cache_free(cache, p);
> + /* p is already in quarantine. */
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, kfree_rcu(p, rcu));
> + break;
> + case 2:
> + /* The actual free order is inverse. */
> + kfree_rcu(p, rcu);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, kmem_cache_free(cache, p));
> + break;
> + case 3:
> + migrate_disable();
Shouldn't this be before allocation? If task migrates to another NUMA,
the test would fail
because kfree_rcu_sheaf() declines objects from foreign NUMA:
mm/slab_common.c:kfree_rcu_sheaf() {
...
if (likely(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) || slab_nid(slab) == numa_mem_id()))
return __kfree_rcu_sheaf(s, obj, SLAB_FREE_DEFAULT);
return false;
}
Also the tests fail with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y (causing use after free
reports and all sorts of warnings)
for similar reason, in PREEMPT_RT=y case kfree_rcu_sheaf() skipped:
void kvfree_call_rcu(struct kvfree_rcu_head *head, void *ptr)
{
...
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && kfree_rcu_sheaf(ptr))
[ 1.552763] ok 37 kmem_cache_double_free
[ 1.553617] # kmem_cache_double_free_rcu_1: EXPECTATION FAILED
at mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c:1109
KASAN failure expected in "kfree_rcu(p, rcu)", but
none occurred
[ 1.606445] ==================================================================
[ 1.606446] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in
__kmem_cache_double_free_rcu+0x111a/0x1280
[ 1.606452] Read of size 4 at addr ffff88800da67b10 by task
kunit_try_catch/203
....
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/kasan/kunit: Add double-free tests involving kfree_rcu_sheaf().
2026-10-28 19:10 ` Andrey Ryabinin
@ 2026-10-28 19:24 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima @ 2026-10-28 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrey Ryabinin
Cc: Andrew Morton, Vlastimil Babka, Harry Yoo, Alexander Potapenko,
Andrey Konovalov, Dmitry Vyukov, Vincenzo Frascino, Hao Li,
Christoph Lameter, David Rientjes, Roman Gushchin, kasan-dev,
linux-mm
On Wed, 28 Oct 2026 12:10:23 -0700, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com> writes:
> >
> > +#ifndef MODULE
> > +static void __kmem_cache_double_free_rcu(struct kunit *test, int mode)
> > +{
> > + struct kasan_rcu_info *p, *victim = NULL, **objs;
> > + struct kmem_cache *cache;
> > + int i, n = 0;
> > +
> > + KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_ON(test, CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC);
> > +
> > + cache = kmem_cache_create("test_cache", sizeof(*p), 0, SLAB_NO_MERGE,
> > + NULL);
> > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, cache);
> > +
> > + if (!cache->sheaf_capacity) {
> > + kmem_cache_destroy(cache);
> > + kunit_skip(test, "Test requires sheaves");
> > + }
> > +
> > + objs = kunit_kcalloc(test, cache->sheaf_capacity * 2, sizeof(*objs),
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!objs) {
> > + kunit_err(test, "Allocation failed: %s\n", __func__);
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + p = kmem_cache_alloc(cache, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!p) {
> > + kunit_err(test, "Allocation failed: %s\n", __func__);
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + switch (mode) {
> > + case 1:
> > + kmem_cache_free(cache, p);
> > + /* p is already in quarantine. */
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, kfree_rcu(p, rcu));
> > + break;
> > + case 2:
> > + /* The actual free order is inverse. */
> > + kfree_rcu(p, rcu);
> > + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, kmem_cache_free(cache, p));
> > + break;
> > + case 3:
> > + migrate_disable();
>
> Shouldn't this be before allocation? If task migrates to another NUMA,
> the test would fail
> because kfree_rcu_sheaf() declines objects from foreign NUMA:
Ah indeed, I'll squash this.
---8<---
@@ -1096,8 +1097,11 @@ static void __kmem_cache_double_free_rcu(struct kunit *test, int mode)
goto out;
}
+ migrate_disable();
+
p = kmem_cache_alloc(cache, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!p) {
+ migrate_enable();
kunit_err(test, "Allocation failed: %s\n", __func__);
goto out;
}
@@ -1107,14 +1111,15 @@ static void __kmem_cache_double_free_rcu(struct kunit *test, int mode)
kmem_cache_free(cache, p);
/* p is already in quarantine. */
KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, kfree_rcu(p, rcu));
+ migrate_enable();
break;
case 2:
/* The actual free order is inverse. */
kfree_rcu(p, rcu);
KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, kmem_cache_free(cache, p));
+ migrate_enable();
break;
case 3:
- migrate_disable();
kfree_rcu(p, rcu);
for (i = 0; i < cache->sheaf_capacity - 1; i++) {
---8<---
>
> mm/slab_common.c:kfree_rcu_sheaf() {
> ...
> if (likely(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) || slab_nid(slab) == numa_mem_id()))
> return __kfree_rcu_sheaf(s, obj, SLAB_FREE_DEFAULT);
>
> return false;
> }
>
>
> Also the tests fail with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y (causing use after free
> reports and all sorts of warnings)
> for similar reason, in PREEMPT_RT=y case kfree_rcu_sheaf() skipped:
Exactly, I'll add this to v3.
---8<---
diff --git a/mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c b/mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c
index 83c418c0ef87..3c9ffee8001b 100644
--- a/mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c
+++ b/mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c
@@ -1079,6 +1079,7 @@ static void __kmem_cache_double_free_rcu(struct kunit *test, int mode)
int i, n = 0;
KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_ON(test, CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC);
+ KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_OFF(test, CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT);
cache = kmem_cache_create("test_cache", sizeof(*p), 0, SLAB_NO_MERGE,
NULL);
---8<---
Thank you !
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/kasan/kunit: Add double-free tests involving kfree_rcu_sheaf().
2026-10-27 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/kasan/kunit: Add double-free tests " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-28 16:23 ` Alexander Potapenko
2026-10-28 19:10 ` Andrey Ryabinin
@ 2026-10-28 22:26 ` sashiko-bot
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-10-28 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima, Andrey Ryabinin, Andrew Morton,
Vlastimil Babka, Harry Yoo
Cc: Alexander Potapenko, Andrey Konovalov, Dmitry Vyukov,
Vincenzo Frascino, Hao Li, Christoph Lameter, David Rientjes,
Roman Gushchin, kasan-dev, linux-mm
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] mm/kasan: missing Kconfig guards in __kmem_cache_double_free_rcu()
- [Medium] mm/kasan/kunit: CPU and NUMA migration race in __kmem_cache_double_free_rcu()
--
commit 2267f8620b312bfdd7e76e11214e3ba726322685
Author: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>
mm/kasan/kunit: Add double-free tests involving kfree_rcu_sheaf().
This commit adds KUnit test cases to verify that KASAN immediately detects
double-free combinations involving kfree_rcu_sheaf() and prevents a
reallocated victim object from being poisoned when the RCU sheaf is flushed.
> diff --git a/mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c b/mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c
> index b9e167ed5be32..83c418c0ef878 100644
> --- a/mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c
> +++ b/mm/kasan/kasan_test_c.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1070,6 +1071,134 @@ static void kmem_cache_double_free(struct kunit *test)
> kmem_cache_destroy(cache);
> }
>
> +#ifndef MODULE
> +static void __kmem_cache_double_free_rcu(struct kunit *test, int mode)
> +{
> + struct kasan_rcu_info *p, *victim = NULL, **objs;
> + struct kmem_cache *cache;
> + int i, n = 0;
> +
> + KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_ON(test, CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC);
> +
> + cache = kmem_cache_create("test_cache", sizeof(*p), 0, SLAB_NO_MERGE,
> + NULL);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, cache);
> +
> + if (!cache->sheaf_capacity) {
> + kmem_cache_destroy(cache);
> + kunit_skip(test, "Test requires sheaves");
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
Should __kmem_cache_double_free_rcu() also check that
CONFIG_KVFREE_RCU_BATCHED is enabled and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is disabled?
In calculate_sheaf_capacity(), cache->sheaf_capacity is set to a non-zero
value whenever CONFIG_SLUB_TINY is disabled and debug flags are not set on
the cache, regardless of CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT or CONFIG_KVFREE_RCU_BATCHED.
However, kvfree_call_rcu() in mm/slab_common.c only calls kfree_rcu_sheaf()
when CONFIG_KVFREE_RCU_BATCHED is enabled and CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is disabled:
mm/slab_common.c:
#ifndef CONFIG_KVFREE_RCU_BATCHED
void kvfree_call_rcu(struct kvfree_rcu_head *head, void *ptr)
{
if (head) {
kasan_record_aux_stack(ptr);
call_rcu(&head->head, kvfree_rcu_cb);
return;
}
...
#endif
and in the batched implementation:
mm/slab_common.c:kvfree_call_rcu() {
...
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && kfree_rcu_sheaf(ptr))
return;
...
}
When CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y or CONFIG_KVFREE_RCU_BATCHED=n (for example with
CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y or CONFIG_TINY_RCU=y), cache->sheaf_capacity
is non-zero so the test does not skip, but kfree_rcu(p, rcu) bypasses
__kfree_rcu_sheaf() where kasan_slab_pre_free() and
kasan_mark_rcu_free_pending() are called.
Wouldn't this cause KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL() to fail across all three modes,
free and poison the reallocated live victim object during
kvfree_rcu_barrier_on_cache(cache) in modes 1 and 2, and queue the same
p->rcu head twice in mode 3?
Adding KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_ON(test, CONFIG_KVFREE_RCU_BATCHED) and
KASAN_TEST_NEEDS_CONFIG_OFF(test, CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) would skip the test on
configurations where kfree_rcu_sheaf() is not used.
> +
> + objs = kunit_kcalloc(test, cache->sheaf_capacity * 2, sizeof(*objs),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!objs) {
> + kunit_err(test, "Allocation failed: %s\n", __func__);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + p = kmem_cache_alloc(cache, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!p) {
> + kunit_err(test, "Allocation failed: %s\n", __func__);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + switch (mode) {
> + case 1:
> + kmem_cache_free(cache, p);
> + /* p is already in quarantine. */
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, kfree_rcu(p, rcu));
> + break;
> + case 2:
> + /* The actual free order is inverse. */
> + kfree_rcu(p, rcu);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, kmem_cache_free(cache, p));
> + break;
> + case 3:
> + migrate_disable();
> + kfree_rcu(p, rcu);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < cache->sheaf_capacity - 1; i++) {
> + objs[i] = kmem_cache_alloc(cache, GFP_KERNEL);
> + kfree_rcu(objs[i], rcu);
> + }
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, kfree_rcu(p, rcu));
> + migrate_enable();
> +
> + /*
> + * Move the 1st full sheaf to quarantine, keeping the
> + * 2nd in pcs->rcu_free.
> + */
> + rcu_barrier();
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Move p to quarantine if not poisoned yet (case 2,
> + * or fallback in case 3).
> + */
> + if (kasan_byte_accessible(p))
> + kvfree_rcu_barrier_on_cache(cache);
> +
> + /*
> + * Evict p from quarantine and reallocate it as a live victim object
> + * before the RCU sheaf is flushed.
> + */
> + kasan_quarantine_remove_cache(cache);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < cache->sheaf_capacity * 2; i++) {
> + objs[n] = kmem_cache_alloc(cache, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!objs[n])
> + break;
> + if (objs[n] == p) {
> + victim = objs[n];
> + break;
> + }
> + n++;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
> + kmem_cache_free(cache, objs[i]);
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, victim, p);
[Severity: Medium]
Can task migration across CPUs or NUMA nodes cause spurious failures in
__kmem_cache_double_free_rcu()?
Because kunit_try_catch_run() executes the test in an unbound kthread, the
task can migrate whenever migration is not disabled:
1. p = kmem_cache_alloc(cache, GFP_KERNEL) runs before migrate_disable() in
mode 3, and modes 1 and 2 do not call migrate_disable() at all. In
kfree_rcu_sheaf() in mm/slab_common.c:
s = slab->slab_cache;
if (likely(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) || slab_nid(slab) == numa_mem_id()))
return __kfree_rcu_sheaf(s, obj, SLAB_FREE_DEFAULT);
return false;
If the task migrates to a CPU on a different NUMA node between allocating p
and calling kfree_rcu(p, rcu), slab_nid(slab) == numa_mem_id() is false and
kfree_rcu_sheaf() returns false, falling back to the non-sheaf
kvfree_call_rcu() path. This bypasses __kfree_rcu_sheaf(), causing
KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL() to fail and queueing the double-freed object into
krcp.
2. Following the switch block, rcu_barrier(),
kvfree_rcu_barrier_on_cache(cache), and kasan_quarantine_remove_cache(cache)
can sleep with migration enabled, and the victim reallocation loop also runs
without migrate_disable(). If the task migrates to another NUMA node before
or during the loop, refill_objects() only refills from local_node while
__refill_objects_any() skips p's node because n->nr_partial <= s->min_partial,
allocating a new slab instead of p. Even on a single NUMA node, if the task
migrates to another CPU mid-loop after refill_sheaf() moves p into the first
CPU's pcs->main->objects[0], p remains in the first CPU's per-CPU sheaf and
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, victim, p) fails.
Would it make sense to wrap the initial allocation and free sequence in
migrate_disable() / migrate_enable() for all modes, and either keep the task
on the same CPU/node or use kmem_cache_alloc_node(..., folio_nid(virt_to_folio(p)))
under migrate_disable() when reallocating victim?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261027222557.1072105-1-kuniyu@google.com?part=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-28 22:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-27 22:25 [PATCH v2 0/2] mm/kasan: Detect double-free involving kfree_rcu_sheaf() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-27 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-28 16:22 ` Alexander Potapenko
2026-10-28 18:13 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2026-10-27 22:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mm/kasan/kunit: Add double-free tests " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-28 16:23 ` Alexander Potapenko
2026-10-28 19:10 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2026-10-28 19:24 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-10-28 22:26 ` sashiko-bot
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.