All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/45] KVM: x86/emulate: Check TSS busy-bit writes during task switches
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2026 18:22:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-193930@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261102174130.8779-5-pbonzini@redhat.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] KVM: x86/emulate: unhandled write_segment_descriptor() error in task switch
- [High] KVM: x86/emulate: task switch drops faults and IO_NEEDED on descriptor writes
--

commit 31629465ad13b50735702c0107b5866c7a5a5806
Author: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

KVM: x86/emulate: Check TSS busy-bit writes during task switches

This commit checks the return values of the write_segment_descriptor() calls
that clear the old TSS busy bit and set the new TSS busy bit in
emulator_do_task_switch(), returning early on failure so that failed writes
stop the task switch.

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> index c1b21282187f3..711794592c2ca 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
> @@ -2925,7 +2925,9 @@ static int emulator_do_task_switch(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
>  
>  	if (reason == TASK_SWITCH_IRET || reason == TASK_SWITCH_JMP) {
>  		curr_tss_desc.type &= ~(1 << 1); /* clear busy flag */
> -		write_segment_descriptor(ctxt, old_tss_sel, &curr_tss_desc);
> +		ret = write_segment_descriptor(ctxt, old_tss_sel, &curr_tss_desc);
> +		if (ret != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
> +			return ret;

[Severity: High]
When write_segment_descriptor() fails in arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:
emulator_do_task_switch(), will returning the non-X86EMUL_CONTINUE status
actually reach the emulation-failure exit in kvm_task_switch(), or does it
cause emulator_task_switch() to return EMULATION_OK while skipping register
writeback?

Tracing the call chain from write_segment_descriptor() ->
linear_write_system() -> emulator_write_std() ->
kvm_write_guest_virt_helper():

arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:kvm_write_guest_virt_helper() {
	...
		if (gpa == INVALID_GPA)
			return X86EMUL_PROPAGATE_FAULT;
		ret = kvm_vcpu_write_guest(vcpu, gpa, data, towrite);
		if (ret < 0) {
			r = X86EMUL_IO_NEEDED;
			goto out;
		}
	...
}

At this commit (prior to the later commit "KVM: x86/emulate: Propagate memory
faults to userspace" in the series), any write failure returns
X86EMUL_PROPAGATE_FAULT or X86EMUL_IO_NEEDED (without setting
vcpu->mmio_needed), and never returns X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE. Even after commit
"KVM: x86/emulate: Propagate memory faults to userspace" wires up
X86EMUL_MEMORY_FAULT to EMULATION_MEMORY_FAULT, non-memory-attribute failures
still return X86EMUL_PROPAGATE_FAULT (for example, when the GDT page is
mapped read-only in the guest page tables with CR0.WP=1) or
X86EMUL_IO_NEEDED (for example, when the GDT is in a read-only memslot).

In arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:emulator_task_switch():

	if (rc == X86EMUL_CONTINUE) {
		ctxt->eip = ctxt->_eip;
		writeback_registers(ctxt);
	}

	return (rc == X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE) ? EMULATION_FAILED : EMULATION_OK;

And in arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:kvm_task_switch():

	if (ret || vcpu->mmio_needed)
		goto unhandled_task_switch;

	kvm_rip_write(vcpu, ctxt->eip);
	kvm_set_rflags(vcpu, ctxt->eflags);
	return 1;

When this first write_segment_descriptor() call fails on an IRET or JMP task
switch, skip_emulated_instruction() has already advanced RIP, and
emulator_task_switch() returns EMULATION_OK (0) with vcpu->mmio_needed false.
Doesn't kvm_task_switch() then silently turn the task switch into a no-op and
resume the guest without injecting an exception or exiting to userspace?

>  	}
>  
>  	if (reason == TASK_SWITCH_IRET)
> @@ -2949,7 +2951,9 @@ static int emulator_do_task_switch(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
>  
>  	if (reason != TASK_SWITCH_IRET) {
>  		next_tss_desc.type |= (1 << 1); /* set busy flag */
> -		write_segment_descriptor(ctxt, tss_selector, &next_tss_desc);
> +		ret = write_segment_descriptor(ctxt, tss_selector, &next_tss_desc);
> +		if (ret != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
> +			return ret;

[Severity: High]
Similarly, if this second write_segment_descriptor() call in
arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:emulator_do_task_switch() fails with
X86EMUL_PROPAGATE_FAULT or X86EMUL_IO_NEEDED (for instance, if the GDT page
containing next_tss_desc is read-only or unmapped under the new CR3 just
loaded by load_state_from_tss32() when segment descriptors are VM86/NULL or
already have the Accessed bit set, or if the GDT resides in a read-only
memslot), can returning early here leave the vCPU in a half-switched state?

At this point in emulator_do_task_switch(), task_switch_16() or
task_switch_32() has already committed the new task's CR3, ctxt->eflags, and
segment registers (LDTR, ES, CS, SS, DS, FS, GS). Returning early skips
setting X86_CR0_TS, loading VCPU_SREG_TR, pushing error_code, and updating
dr7 in emulator_do_task_switch(), and skips updating ctxt->eip = ctxt->_eip
and calling writeback_registers(ctxt) in emulator_task_switch().

Because emulator_task_switch() still translates X86EMUL_PROPAGATE_FAULT and
X86EMUL_IO_NEEDED into EMULATION_OK without setting ctxt->have_exception, and
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:kvm_task_switch() neither checks ctxt->have_exception nor
takes the unhandled_task_switch path when ret is 0 and vcpu->mmio_needed is
false:

	ret = emulator_task_switch(ctxt, tss_selector, idt_index, reason,
				   has_error_code, error_code);

	/*
	 * Report an error userspace if MMIO is needed, as KVM doesn't support
	 * MMIO during a task switch (or any other complex operation).
	 */
	if (ret || vcpu->mmio_needed)
		goto unhandled_task_switch;

	kvm_rip_write(vcpu, ctxt->eip);
	kvm_set_rflags(vcpu, ctxt->eflags);
	return 1;

Won't kvm_task_switch() drop the architectural fault or write failure and
resume the guest with the new task's CR3, EFLAGS, and segments but the old
task's TR, RIP, and general-purpose registers?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261102174130.8779-1-pbonzini@redhat.com?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-02 18:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-02 17:40 [PATCH v4 00/45] KVM: x86: Introduce memory protection attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:40 ` [PATCH 01/45] KVM: nVMX/nSVM: check unconditionally whether CR3 is valid Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 18:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 17:40 ` [PATCH 02/45] KVM: x86/hyperv: do not overwrite hc->ingpa for SIGNAL_EVENT hypercall Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:40 ` [PATCH 03/45] KVM: x86: apply nGPA->GPA translation to KVM_HC_CLOCK_PAIRING Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:40 ` [PATCH 04/45] KVM: x86/emulate: Check TSS busy-bit writes during task switches Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 18:22   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-02 17:40 ` [PATCH 05/45] KVM: loongarch: do full validity check on the gfn-to-hva cache Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:40 ` [PATCH 06/45] KVM: selftests: Test address translation for Hyper-V direct L2 hypercalls Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:40 ` [PATCH 07/45] KVM: selftests: Take into account mixed memory fault flags Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 17:40 ` [PATCH 08/45] selftests: kvm: drop TEST_ASSERT_SUPPORTED_ATTRIBUTES Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:40 ` [PATCH 09/45] KVM: Define and communicate KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT RWX flags to userspace Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 17:40 ` [PATCH 10/45] KVM: x86: Introduce memory fault on invalid hypercalls reads/writes Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:40 ` [PATCH 11/45] KVM: selftests: test hypercall memory fault exits Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 17:40 ` [PATCH 12/45] KVM: x86/mmu: intersect writability from __kvm_faultin_pfn with fault->map_writable Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:40 ` [PATCH 13/45] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend map_writable to a full ACC_* mask Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:40 ` [PATCH 14/45] KVM: x86/mmu: Init memslot hugepage information for non-private_mem VMs too Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:40 ` [PATCH 15/45] KVM: VMX: return error from kvm_set_cr* Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:41 ` [PATCH 16/45] KVM: adjust for presence of more than one attribute Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 18:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 17:44 ` [PATCH 17/45] KVM: Introduce NR/NW/NX memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 18:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03  9:25   ` kernel test robot
2026-11-02 17:44 ` [PATCH 18/45] KVM: Include memory protections in result of gfn->hva conversion Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:44 ` [PATCH 19/45] KVM: Introduce kvm_fetch_guest_page() and use it for x86 Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:44 ` [PATCH 20/45] KVM: Take memory protections into account for memory read/write/fetch Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:44 ` [PATCH 21/45] KVM: Take memory protections into account for __kvm_vcpu_map Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:44 ` [PATCH 22/45] KVM: Encapsulate memattrs array into anonymous struct Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:44 ` [PATCH 23/45] KVM: Introduce kvm_check_gen()/kvm_memslots_check_gen() Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 18:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 18:07   ` kernel test robot
2026-11-02 17:44 ` [PATCH 24/45] KVM: Introduce a generation number for memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 18:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-03 14:11   ` kernel test robot
2026-11-02 17:44 ` [PATCH 25/45] KVM: Take memory protections into account for accesses with cached gfn->hva Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 18:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 17:44 ` [PATCH 26/45] KVM: pfncache: Fail to refresh if it contains memory protections Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 18:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 17:44 ` [PATCH 27/45] KVM: x86/mmu: Do not prefetch sptes on gfns backed by memory attributes Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:44 ` [PATCH 28/45] KVM: x86/mmu: Take memory protection attributes into account during faults Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 18:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 17:44 ` [PATCH 29/45] KVM: x86/emulate: change return value of emulator_io_permitted to int Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:44 ` [PATCH 30/45] KVM: x86/emulate: Propagate memory faults to userspace Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 18:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 17:44 ` [PATCH 31/45] KVM: x86: "Handle" failed decode when skipping instructions Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 18:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 17:44 ` [PATCH 32/45] KVM: vmx/sgx: make return value of sgx_gva_to_gpa consistent with its callers Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:45 ` [PATCH 33/45] KVM: x86: Allow page fault fixup to return errors Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:45 ` [PATCH 34/45] KVM: x86/mmu: Adjust gva_to_gpa to allow returning an error Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 18:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 17:45 ` [PATCH 35/45] KVM: x86/mmu: Propagate errors from nested GPA translation Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:45 ` [PATCH 36/45] KVM: x86: Propagate memory faults through load_pdptrs() Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 18:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 17:45 ` [PATCH 37/45] KVM: x86/mmu: Issue memory fault exit if walk failed due to memory attribute Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 18:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 17:45 ` [PATCH 38/45] KVM: x86: mark VM as dead after KVM_SET_SREGS fails to load PDPTRs Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 18:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 17:45 ` [PATCH 39/45] KVM: VMX: mark VM dead on shadow VMCS or eVMCS access failures Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 18:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 17:45 ` [PATCH 40/45] KVM: let kvm_arch_post_set_memory_attributes drop mmu_lock Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:45 ` [PATCH 41/45] KVM: x86/mmu: Obsolete all roots if memattr contains gPTEs Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:45 ` [PATCH 42/45] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory protection attributes test Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 18:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 17:45 ` [PATCH 43/45] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory attributes PTE test Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 17:45 ` [PATCH 44/45] KVM: x86: selftests: Introduce memory attributes side-channel tests Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-02 18:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 17:45 ` [PATCH 45/45] KVM: x86: split out parts of load_pdptrs Paolo Bonzini
2026-11-03 14:40 ` [syzbot ci] Re: KVM: x86: Introduce memory protection attributes syzbot ci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-193930@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.