From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
"Oliver Hartkopp" <socketcan@hartkopp.net>,
"Vincent Mailhol" <mailhol@kernel.org>,
"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 08/12] dt-bindings: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Restrict resets in top-level
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 11:51:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-208910@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110115112.3807247-9-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Low] dt-bindings: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: duplicate reset-names:
false in allOf
--
commit 673edc90f4112a3f288e1450d2ac3c1b416dd41b
Author: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>
dt-bindings: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Restrict resets in top-level
This commit constrains the top-level resets property to 1 or 2 items,
removes redundant maxItems: 2 entries in per-variant conditionals, and adds
reset-names: false to the renesas,rcar-gen3-canfd and
renesas,rcar-gen4-canfd conditional block.
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20261001060825.53335-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/renesas,rcar-canfd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/renesas,rcar-canfd.yaml
> index bbaaef8f4282e..1a7a9ce45e977 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/renesas,rcar-canfd.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/renesas,rcar-canfd.yaml
[ ... ]
> @@ -231,6 +232,8 @@ allOf:
> resets:
> maxItems: 1
>
> + reset-names: false
[Severity: Low]
Does this duplicate the reset-names: false constraint already present in a
second if-then block for the same compatible strings further down in allOf?
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/renesas,rcar-canfd.yaml:
- if:
properties:
compatible:
contains:
enum:
- renesas,rcar-gen3-canfd
- renesas,rcar-gen4-canfd
then:
required:
- resets
properties:
reset-names: false
These two identical if conditions for renesas,rcar-gen3-canfd and
renesas,rcar-gen4-canfd could be merged, or the binding could be split into
separate schema documents to avoid accumulating fragmented per-compatible
conditionals.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110115112.3807247-1-mkl@pengutronix.de?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 11:41 [PATCH net-next 0/12] pull-request: can-next 2026-11-10 Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 01/12] dt-bindings: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Document RZ/G3S SoC Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-11 11:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 12:20 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-12 18:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 02/12] can: rcar_canfd: Fix typos in macro names Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-11 11:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 03/12] can: rcar_canfd: Allow the CAN FD clock to be sourced from fck Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-11 11:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 12:20 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 04/12] can: rcar_canfd: Do not set registers selecting the CAN mode Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 05/12] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Renesas RZ/G3S Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-11 12:20 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 06/12] can: rcar_canfd: Check can_clk request for errors Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-11 12:20 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 07/12] can: rcar_canfd: Use DT clock names in the probe message Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-11 11:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 12:01 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-12 12:25 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-12 13:39 ` claudiu beznea
2026-11-12 13:44 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-12 18:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-11-11 12:20 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 08/12] dt-bindings: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Restrict resets in top-level Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-11 11:51 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-11 12:20 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 09/12] dt-bindings: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Simplify renesas,no-can-fd description Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 10/12] can: rcar_canfd: Document that RZ/G3S has no Classical CAN mode Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-11 12:20 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 11/12] dt-bindings: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Document RZ/G3L SoC Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-11-11 11:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 12:20 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-11-10 11:41 ` [PATCH net-next 12/12] can: rcar_canfd: Add support for Renesas RZ/G3L Marc Kleine-Budde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-208910@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mailhol@kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.