From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "David Matlack" <dmatlack@google.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: "Alexander Graf" <graf@amazon.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Baolin Wang" <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Hugh Dickins" <hughd@google.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Mike Rapoport" <rppt@kernel.org>,
"Pasha Tatashin" <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
"Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@kernel.org>,
"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"Samiullah Khawaja" <skhawaja@google.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Suren Baghdasaryan" <surenb@google.com>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/19] mm/shmem_luo: Leave freeing the preserved state to finish()
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 00:31:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-209941@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111002358.1842967-10-dmatlack@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] mm/shmem_luo: preserved folios freed before finish() if
retrieve_folios() fails
--
commit 07031901f696f6bb10658c21e386ae0237da0633
Author: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
mm/shmem_luo: Leave freeing the preserved state to finish()
This commit defers freeing the serialized shmem state from
shmem_luo_retrieve() to shmem_luo_finish() so that preserved folios are not
leaked or freed prematurely when retrieve fails.
> diff --git a/mm/shmem_luo.c b/mm/shmem_luo.c
> index e747a04422954..b48d7f460493d 100644
> --- a/mm/shmem_luo.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem_luo.c
> @@ -390,13 +390,10 @@ static void shmem_luo_finish(struct liveupdate_file_op_args *args)
> struct shmem_luo_ser *ser;
>
> /*
> - * If retrieve was successful, nothing to do. If it failed, retrieve()
> - * already cleaned up everything it could. So nothing to do there
> - * either. Only need to clean up when retrieve was not called.
> + * Preserved folios may be in use until the session is finished, so
> + * retrieve() leaves freeing the preserved state to finish(), whether it
> + * succeeds or not.
> */
> - if (args->retrieve_status)
> - return;
> -
> ser = phys_to_virt(args->serialized_data);
> if (!ser)
> return;
> @@ -515,9 +512,34 @@ static int shmem_luo_retrieve_folios(struct file *file,
> return err;
> }
>
> -static int shmem_luo_retrieve(struct liveupdate_file_op_args *args)
> +/*
> + * Restore the preserved folios into @file. This consumes them even if it fails,
> + * since they are then either in @file or freed, so make sure finish() doesn't
> + * free them again.
> + */
> +static int shmem_luo_restore_folios(struct file *file,
> + struct shmem_luo_ser *ser)
> {
> struct shmem_luo_folio_ser *folios_ser;
> + u64 nr_folios = ser->nr_folios;
> + int err;
> +
> + if (!nr_folios)
> + return 0;
> +
> + ser->nr_folios = 0;
> +
> + folios_ser = kho_restore_vmalloc(&ser->folios);
> + if (!folios_ser)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + err = shmem_luo_retrieve_folios(file, folios_ser, nr_folios);
> + vfree(folios_ser);
> + return err;
> +}
[ ... ]
> @@ -552,28 +571,15 @@ static int shmem_luo_retrieve(struct liveupdate_file_op_args *args)
> vfs_setpos(file, ser->pos, MAX_LFS_FILESIZE);
> i_size_write(file_inode(file), ser->size);
>
> - if (ser->nr_folios) {
> - folios_ser = kho_restore_vmalloc(&ser->folios);
> - if (!folios_ser) {
> - err = -EINVAL;
> - goto put_file;
> - }
> -
> - err = shmem_luo_retrieve_folios(file, folios_ser, ser->nr_folios);
> - vfree(folios_ser);
> - if (err)
> - goto put_file;
> - }
> + err = shmem_luo_restore_folios(file, ser);
> + if (err)
> + goto put_file;
>
> args->file = file;
> - kho_restore_free(ser);
> -
> return 0;
>
> put_file:
> fput(file);
> -free_ser:
> - kho_restore_free(ser);
> return err;
> }
[Severity: Medium]
Does shmem_luo_retrieve() still free all preserved folios before
shmem_luo_finish() if shmem_luo_retrieve_folios() fails?
When shmem_luo_retrieve_folios() fails mid-loop (for example, if
mem_cgroup_charge() fails), its error path restores and puts the remaining
folios, and the jump to put_file in shmem_luo_retrieve() calls fput(file),
which evicts the inode and frees the folios already added to the page cache:
mm/shmem_luo.c:shmem_luo_retrieve_folios() {
...
unlock_folio:
folio_unlock(folio);
folio_put(folio);
put_folios:
...
for (long j = i + 1; j < nr_folios; j++) {
...
folio = kho_restore_folio(phys);
if (folio)
folio_put(folio);
}
}
If a preserved device still holds DMA mappings to those folios until the
session finishes, freeing them during retrieve() allows the pages to be
reallocated while still in use.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261111002358.1842967-1-dmatlack@google.com?part=9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-11 0:23 [PATCH v4 00/19] liveupdate: Preserve tmpfs files across Live Update David Matlack
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 01/19] liveupdate: Remove the list of steps from luo_preserve_file()'s comment David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 02/19] liveupdate: Pass user argument to file preserve and retrieve David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 03/19] selftests/liveupdate: Add tests for preserve and retrieve user argument David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 04/19] liveupdate: Allow file handlers to mark retrieve failures as retryable David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 05/19] mm: Rename memfd_luo to shmem_luo David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 06/19] liveupdate: Don't WARN if tracking a retrieved file fails David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 07/19] liveupdate: Add helpers to track the files that LUO manages David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 08/19] liveupdate: Let file handlers retrieve into an existing file David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 09/19] mm/shmem_luo: Leave freeing the preserved state to finish() David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 10/19] mm/shmem_luo: Don't make early retrieve failures permanent David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 11/19] mm/shmem_luo: Require permission to preserve a file David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 12/19] mm/shmem_luo: Retrieve tmpfs files into a file created by userspace David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 13/19] mm/shmem_luo: Allow preserving tmpfs files David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 14/19] selftests/liveupdate: Test which tmpfs files can be preserved David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 15/19] selftests/liveupdate: Add a test for retrieving tmpfs files David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 16/19] selftests/liveupdate: Test memfds and LUO interactions in luo_tmpfs David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 17/19] selftests/liveupdate: Test the targets of retrieved tmpfs files David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 18/19] selftests/liveupdate: Test retrieving tmpfs files preserved read-only David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 0:23 ` [PATCH v4 19/19] selftests/liveupdate: Test block accounting of retrieved tmpfs files David Matlack
2026-11-12 0:31 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-209941@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.