From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Varadarajan Narayanan" <varadarajan.narayanan@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 03/11] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5210: Introduce RDP504 NAND variant DT file
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 04:49:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-210395@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112-08-dts-v9-3-c34de4f78fbb@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5210: identical root compatible on
RDP504 NAND and eMMC
--
commit 073c305d3df5613ad5b8c3e588379e6b62b9fe9c
Author: Varadarajan Narayanan <varadarajan.narayanan@oss.qualcomm.com>
arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5210: Introduce RDP504 NAND variant DT file
This commit adds a devicetree file for the IPQ5210 RDP504 NAND board
variant, enables QPIC NAND in quad mode, and adds the new DTB to the
Makefile.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5210-rdp504-nand.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5210-rdp504-nand.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..1145fcf0a3025
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5210-rdp504-nand.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. and/or its subsidiaries.
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include "ipq5210-rdp504-common.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. IPQ5210 RDP504 (NAND)";
> + compatible = "qcom,ipq5210-rdp504", "qcom,ipq5210";
> +};
[Severity: Medium]
Should ipq5210-rdp504-nand.dts use a distinct board compatible string instead
of sharing "qcom,ipq5210-rdp504" with the eMMC variant in ipq5210-rdp504.dts?
In ipq5210-rdp504-common.dtsi, qpic_snand_default_state and
sdhc_default_state mux gpio0 through gpio5 to mutually exclusive functions for
NAND and eMMC. When both DTBs are packaged in a multi-DTB image such as a FIT
image, a bootloader matching on the root compatible property cannot
distinguish between the two variants and may load the wrong DTB, causing
storage initialization to fail.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261112-08-dts-v9-0-c34de4f78fbb@oss.qualcomm.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 4:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 4:36 [PATCH v9 00/11] Enable mutliple peripherals in IPQ5210 Varadarajan Narayanan
2026-11-12 4:36 ` [PATCH v9 01/11] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5210: Add nodes for multiple peripherals Varadarajan Narayanan
2026-11-12 5:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:36 ` [PATCH v9 02/11] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5210: Introduce RDP504 common DT file Varadarajan Narayanan
2026-11-12 4:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:36 ` [PATCH v9 03/11] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5210: Introduce RDP504 NAND variant " Varadarajan Narayanan
2026-11-12 4:49 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-12 4:36 ` [PATCH v9 04/11] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5210: Add support for WPS button Varadarajan Narayanan
2026-11-12 4:36 ` [PATCH v9 05/11] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5210: Add C3 CPU idle state Varadarajan Narayanan
2026-11-12 4:36 ` [PATCH v9 06/11] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5210: Add ICE support to SDHCI Varadarajan Narayanan
2026-11-12 4:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:36 ` [PATCH v9 07/11] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5210: Enable download mode support Varadarajan Narayanan
2026-11-12 4:36 ` [PATCH v9 08/11] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5210: Enable the PWM block Varadarajan Narayanan
2026-11-12 4:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:36 ` [PATCH v9 09/11] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5210: Add I2C nodes Varadarajan Narayanan
2026-11-12 4:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:36 ` [PATCH v9 10/11] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5210: Add SPI node definitions Varadarajan Narayanan
2026-11-12 5:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 4:36 ` [PATCH v9 11/11] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5210: Add random number generator node Varadarajan Narayanan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-210395@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=varadarajan.narayanan@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.