From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Carlos López" <clopez@suse.de>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] riscv: mm: add pud_soft_dirty()
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 14:25:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-212977@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112142039.907090-4-clopez@suse.de>
> riscv supports soft-dirty and PUD-sized transparent huge pages, but only
> provides pmd_soft_dirty() and not pud_soft_dirty(). Add it, so generic
> code can check the soft-dirty bit of a huge PUD.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carlos López <clopez@suse.de>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261112142039.907090-2-clopez@suse.de?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-13 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 14:20 [PATCH v3 0/9] KVM: don't zap secondary MMU on permission upgrade Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] mm: fix eager write-bit restore for write-notified shared mappings Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] riscv: mm: add pud_soft_dirty() Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] mm/huge_memory: honor MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE in change_huge_pud() Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] mm: keep writable entries writable on protection changes Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] mm/mprotect: add MM_CP_PERM_UPGRADE Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] mm/mmu_notifier: add MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_PERM_UPGRADE Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] KVM: pass the mmu_notifier event and flags to kvm_gfn_range Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] KVM: x86/mmu: don't zap secondary MMU on permission upgrade Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] KVM: s390: don't unmap the gmap " Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:26 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-212977@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=clopez@suse.de \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.