From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Carlos López" <clopez@suse.de>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] KVM: x86/mmu: don't zap secondary MMU on permission upgrade
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 14:25:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-212983@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112142039.907090-10-clopez@suse.de>
> When an mmu_notifier invalidation only upgrades permissions
> (MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_PERM_UPGRADE), keep the existing SPTEs instead of
> zapping them. The PFN is unchanged and no access is revoked, so an
> existing SPTE is no more permissive than the new host PTE, and the new
> permissions are picked up on the next fault.
>
> The motivating case is a userfaultfd-wp dirty tracker such as QEMU's
> background snapshot, which unprotects every guest page as it saves it.
> Zapping on each unprotect makes the guest refault its whole working
> set. On a 64GB guest under a background snapshot, a read-mostly workload
> drops secondary-MMU refaults from ~1M/s to ~2.5K/s and cross-vCPU TLB
> shootdowns from ~1400/s to near zero.
>
> Note: this also skips the APIC-access page reload, which is not needed
> as the page's PFN is unchanged.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carlos López <clopez@suse.de>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261112142039.907090-2-clopez@suse.de?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-13 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 14:20 [PATCH v3 0/9] KVM: don't zap secondary MMU on permission upgrade Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] mm: fix eager write-bit restore for write-notified shared mappings Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] riscv: mm: add pud_soft_dirty() Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] mm/huge_memory: honor MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE in change_huge_pud() Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] mm: keep writable entries writable on protection changes Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] mm/mprotect: add MM_CP_PERM_UPGRADE Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] mm/mmu_notifier: add MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_PERM_UPGRADE Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] KVM: pass the mmu_notifier event and flags to kvm_gfn_range Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] KVM: x86/mmu: don't zap secondary MMU on permission upgrade Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] KVM: s390: don't unmap the gmap " Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:26 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-212983@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=clopez@suse.de \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.