* [PATCH 1/3] Revert "drm/amdgpu: re-enable SPM updates in the the IB path"
@ 2026-11-13 15:49 Alex Deucher
2026-11-13 15:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] Revert "drm/amdgpu: reemit RLC SPM register in ring reemit" Alex Deucher
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alex Deucher @ 2026-11-13 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: amd-gfx; +Cc: Alex Deucher
This reverts commit d44428868e5b9f97c6216eee1b4f82aec7a6e8d2.
This causes flakiness in gfx11 CI tests. Revert.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c
index 6210edf1937aa..f98a7c6797b3c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c
@@ -121,9 +121,6 @@ int amdgpu_ib_schedule(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, struct amdgpu_job *job,
struct dma_fence **f)
{
struct amdgpu_device *adev = ring->adev;
- bool emit_spm_needed = adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->update_spm_vmid &&
- (ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_COMPUTE ||
- ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_GFX);
struct amdgpu_ib *ib;
struct dma_fence *tmp = NULL;
struct amdgpu_fence *af;
@@ -212,10 +209,6 @@ int amdgpu_ib_schedule(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, struct amdgpu_job *job,
if (need_pipe_sync)
amdgpu_ring_emit_pipeline_sync(ring);
- if (emit_spm_needed)
- adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->update_spm_vmid(adev, ring->xcc_id,
- adev->vm_manager.spm_vmid);
-
if (emit_gds_needed)
amdgpu_ring_emit_gds_switch(ring, job->vmid, job->gds_base,
job->gds_size, job->gws_base,
--
2.56.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/3] Revert "drm/amdgpu: reemit RLC SPM register in ring reemit" 2026-11-13 15:49 [PATCH 1/3] Revert "drm/amdgpu: re-enable SPM updates in the the IB path" Alex Deucher @ 2026-11-13 15:49 ` Alex Deucher 2026-11-13 15:55 ` sashiko-bot 2026-11-13 15:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/amdgpu: bring back the ring parameter for update_spm_vmid() Alex Deucher 2026-11-13 15:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] Revert "drm/amdgpu: re-enable SPM updates in the the IB path" sashiko-bot 2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Alex Deucher @ 2026-11-13 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: amd-gfx; +Cc: Alex Deucher This reverts commit 8a4dfdc0d2adfc362ec310ff70526e79ff8377b6. This causes flakiness in gfx11 CI tests. Revert. Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c index 324d25c77897a..c3f56253d3b87 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c @@ -715,9 +715,6 @@ void amdgpu_fence_driver_force_completion(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, void amdgpu_ring_set_fence_errors_and_reemit(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, struct amdgpu_fence *guilty_fence) { - bool emit_spm_needed = ring->adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->update_spm_vmid && - (ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_COMPUTE || - ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_GFX); struct dma_fence *unprocessed; struct dma_fence __rcu **ptr; struct amdgpu_fence *fence; @@ -749,9 +746,6 @@ void amdgpu_ring_set_fence_errors_and_reemit(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, } ring->reemit = true; amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, ring->ring_backup_entries_to_copy); - if (emit_spm_needed) - ring->adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->update_spm_vmid(ring->adev, ring->xcc_id, - ring->adev->vm_manager.spm_vmid); spin_lock_irqsave(&ring->fence_drv.lock, flags); do { last_seq++; -- 2.56.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] Revert "drm/amdgpu: reemit RLC SPM register in ring reemit" 2026-11-13 15:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] Revert "drm/amdgpu: reemit RLC SPM register in ring reemit" Alex Deucher @ 2026-11-13 15:55 ` sashiko-bot 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-11-13 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alex Deucher, amd-gfx Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue to consider: - [Low] drm/amdgpu: missing Fixes trailer on revert of commit 8a4dfdc0d2ad -- commit 765981743becaf8dc015c14e1e583ccf6339298b Author: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> > Revert "drm/amdgpu: reemit RLC SPM register in ring reemit" > > This reverts commit 8a4dfdc0d2adfc362ec310ff70526e79ff8377b6. > > This causes flakiness in gfx11 CI tests. Revert. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> [Severity: Low] Since this reverts a commit to fix gfx11 CI flakiness, should the commit message include a Fixes tag so stable and backport tooling pairs it with the offending commit? Fixes: 8a4dfdc0d2ad ("drm/amdgpu: reemit RLC SPM register in ring reemit") -- Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261113154954.1865439-1-alexander.deucher@amd.com?part=2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] drm/amdgpu: bring back the ring parameter for update_spm_vmid() 2026-11-13 15:49 [PATCH 1/3] Revert "drm/amdgpu: re-enable SPM updates in the the IB path" Alex Deucher 2026-11-13 15:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] Revert "drm/amdgpu: reemit RLC SPM register in ring reemit" Alex Deucher @ 2026-11-13 15:49 ` Alex Deucher 2026-11-13 16:15 ` sashiko-bot 2026-11-13 15:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] Revert "drm/amdgpu: re-enable SPM updates in the the IB path" sashiko-bot 2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Alex Deucher @ 2026-11-13 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: amd-gfx Cc: Alex Deucher, Vitaly Prosyak, Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer, Sunil Khatri, Christian König Not emitting the spm update via the ring causes CI flakiness on gfx11. Add back the SPM ring emission, but skip the MMIO path if ring is specified. Do this for all chips with gfxoff. v2: drop ring code in gfx 12.1. We aren't supporting KCQs on 12.1 so the code is not used. v3: emit via the ring for all chips with gfxoff Cc: Vitaly Prosyak <vitaly.prosyak@amd.com> Cc: Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com> Cc: Sunil Khatri <sunil.khatri@amd.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Fixes: 2fb5a4572c76 ("drm/amdgpu: remove the now-redundant runtime SPM VMID update") Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c | 8 ++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_rlc.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c | 13 +++++++++++-- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_1.c | 7 ++++--- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v7_0.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 13 +++++++++++-- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_4_3.c | 4 ++-- 10 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c index f98a7c6797b3c..ae028eeacaed7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c @@ -121,6 +121,10 @@ int amdgpu_ib_schedule(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, struct amdgpu_job *job, struct dma_fence **f) { struct amdgpu_device *adev = ring->adev; + bool emit_spm_needed = adev->gfx.rlc.funcs && + adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->update_spm_vmid && + (ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_COMPUTE || + ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_GFX); struct amdgpu_ib *ib; struct dma_fence *tmp = NULL; struct amdgpu_fence *af; @@ -209,6 +213,10 @@ int amdgpu_ib_schedule(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, struct amdgpu_job *job, if (need_pipe_sync) amdgpu_ring_emit_pipeline_sync(ring); + if (emit_spm_needed) + adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->update_spm_vmid(adev, ring->xcc_id, ring, + adev->vm_manager.spm_vmid); + if (emit_gds_needed) amdgpu_ring_emit_gds_switch(ring, job->vmid, job->gds_base, job->gds_size, job->gws_base, diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_rlc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_rlc.h index e38a8ea02c520..2ae2c1d0f702b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_rlc.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_rlc.h @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ struct amdgpu_rlc_funcs { void (*reset)(struct amdgpu_device *adev); void (*start)(struct amdgpu_device *adev); void (*update_spm_vmid)(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int xcc_id, - unsigned int vmid); + struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned vmid); bool (*is_rlcg_access_range)(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t reg); }; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c index 7683e8a0a4380..9d58af0c678c8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c @@ -8187,8 +8187,17 @@ static void gfx_v10_0_update_spm_vmid_internal(struct amdgpu_device *adev, } static void gfx_v10_0_update_spm_vmid(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int xcc_id, - unsigned int vmid) -{ + struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned int vmid) +{ + if (ring && + ((ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_GFX) || + (ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_COMPUTE))) { + u32 reg = SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmRLC_SPM_MC_CNTL); + u32 data = (vmid & RLC_SPM_MC_CNTL__RLC_SPM_VMID_MASK) << RLC_SPM_MC_CNTL__RLC_SPM_VMID__SHIFT; + amdgpu_ring_emit_wreg(ring, reg, data); + return; + } + amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl(adev, false); gfx_v10_0_update_spm_vmid_internal(adev, vmid); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c index 5d068a9d9c72c..fbf34c346201c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v11_0.c @@ -363,6 +363,7 @@ static void gfx_v11_0_ring_invalidate_tlbs(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, static void gfx_v11_0_set_safe_mode(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int xcc_id); static void gfx_v11_0_unset_safe_mode(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int xcc_id); static void gfx_v11_0_update_spm_vmid(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int xcc_id, + struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned int vmid); static void gfx_v11_0_userq_priv_fault_work(struct work_struct *work); static void gfx_v11_0_update_perf_clk(struct amdgpu_device *adev, @@ -2606,7 +2607,7 @@ static int gfx_v11_0_rlc_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev) * The RLC comes up with RLC_SPM_MC_CNTL cleared, program the SPM VMID * once it runs, also after a GPU reset or a resume. */ - gfx_v11_0_update_spm_vmid(adev, 0, adev->vm_manager.spm_vmid); + gfx_v11_0_update_spm_vmid(adev, 0, NULL, adev->vm_manager.spm_vmid); return 0; } @@ -5615,12 +5616,21 @@ static int gfx_v11_0_update_gfx_clock_gating(struct amdgpu_device *adev, } static void gfx_v11_0_update_spm_vmid(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int xcc_id, - unsigned int vmid) + struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned vmid) { u32 reg, pre_data, data; - amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl(adev, false); reg = SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, regRLC_SPM_MC_CNTL); + + if (ring && + ((ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_GFX) || + (ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_COMPUTE))) { + data = (vmid & RLC_SPM_MC_CNTL__RLC_SPM_VMID_MASK) << RLC_SPM_MC_CNTL__RLC_SPM_VMID__SHIFT; + amdgpu_ring_emit_wreg(ring, reg, data); + return; + } + + amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl(adev, false); if (amdgpu_sriov_is_pp_one_vf(adev) && !amdgpu_sriov_runtime(adev)) pre_data = RREG32_NO_KIQ(reg); else diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c index df2fb09bbcd86..b01e239db195f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c @@ -287,6 +287,7 @@ static void gfx_v12_0_ring_invalidate_tlbs(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, static void gfx_v12_0_set_safe_mode(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int xcc_id); static void gfx_v12_0_unset_safe_mode(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int xcc_id); static void gfx_v12_0_update_spm_vmid(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int xcc_id, + struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned int vmid); static void gfx_v12_0_userq_priv_fault_work(struct work_struct *work); static void gfx_v12_0_update_perf_clk(struct amdgpu_device *adev, @@ -2158,7 +2159,7 @@ static int gfx_v12_0_rlc_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev) * The RLC comes up with RLC_SPM_MC_CNTL cleared, program the SPM VMID * once it runs, also after a GPU reset or a resume. */ - gfx_v12_0_update_spm_vmid(adev, 0, adev->vm_manager.spm_vmid); + gfx_v12_0_update_spm_vmid(adev, 0, NULL, adev->vm_manager.spm_vmid); return 0; } @@ -3978,12 +3979,22 @@ static void gfx_v12_0_update_perf_clk(struct amdgpu_device *adev, static void gfx_v12_0_update_spm_vmid(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int xcc_id, + struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned vmid) { u32 reg, data; - amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl(adev, false); reg = SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, regRLC_SPM_MC_CNTL); + + if (ring && + ((ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_GFX) || + (ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_COMPUTE))) { + data = (vmid & RLC_SPM_MC_CNTL__RLC_SPM_VMID_MASK) << RLC_SPM_MC_CNTL__RLC_SPM_VMID__SHIFT; + amdgpu_ring_emit_wreg(ring, reg, data); + return; + } + + amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl(adev, false); if (amdgpu_sriov_is_pp_one_vf(adev)) data = RREG32_NO_KIQ(reg); else diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_1.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_1.c index 1f57d0fa2c044..bf69d71e6b065 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_1.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_1.c @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static int gfx_v12_1_init_cp_compute_microcode_bo(struct amdgpu_device *adev); static void gfx_v12_1_xcc_update_medium_grain_clock_gating( struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool enable, int xcc_id, bool force); static void gfx_v12_1_update_spm_vmid(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int xcc_id, - unsigned int vmid); + struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned vmid); static void gfx_v12_1_wait_reg_mem(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, int eng_sel, int mem_space, int opt, uint32_t addr0, @@ -1866,7 +1866,7 @@ static int gfx_v12_1_xcc_rlc_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int r; /* init spm vmid with 0xf */ - gfx_v12_1_update_spm_vmid(adev, xcc_id, adev->vm_manager.spm_vmid); + gfx_v12_1_update_spm_vmid(adev, xcc_id, NULL, adev->vm_manager.spm_vmid); if (adev->firmware.load_type == AMDGPU_FW_LOAD_PSP) { gfx_v12_1_xcc_init_csb(adev, xcc_id); @@ -2945,7 +2945,8 @@ static void gfx_v12_1_update_perf_clk(struct amdgpu_device *adev, static void gfx_v12_1_update_spm_vmid(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int xcc_id, - unsigned int vmid) + struct amdgpu_ring *ring, + unsigned vmid) { u32 reg, data; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v7_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v7_0.c index 72c84b61fda16..43dea0810137b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v7_0.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v7_0.c @@ -3256,7 +3256,7 @@ static int gfx_v7_0_rlc_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev) /* init spm vmid with 0xf */ if (adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->update_spm_vmid) - adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->update_spm_vmid(adev, 0, adev->vm_manager.spm_vmid); + adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->update_spm_vmid(adev, 0, NULL, adev->vm_manager.spm_vmid); return 0; } @@ -3483,7 +3483,7 @@ static int gfx_v7_0_rlc_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev) } static void gfx_v7_0_update_spm_vmid(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int xcc_id, - unsigned int vmid) + struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned vmid) { u32 data; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c index 4666aa5b38c75..360a958f7577d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c @@ -1276,7 +1276,7 @@ static int gfx_v8_0_rlc_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev) /* init spm vmid with 0xf */ if (adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->update_spm_vmid) - adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->update_spm_vmid(adev, 0, adev->vm_manager.spm_vmid); + adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->update_spm_vmid(adev, 0, NULL, adev->vm_manager.spm_vmid); return 0; } @@ -5484,7 +5484,7 @@ static void gfx_v8_0_unset_safe_mode(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int xcc_id) } static void gfx_v8_0_update_spm_vmid(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int xcc_id, - unsigned int vmid) + struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned vmid) { u32 data; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c index 2e2673a6dbbf5..7d001d7e3a0d0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c @@ -5227,8 +5227,17 @@ static void gfx_v9_0_update_spm_vmid_internal(struct amdgpu_device *adev, } static void gfx_v9_0_update_spm_vmid(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int xcc_id, - unsigned int vmid) -{ + struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned int vmid) +{ + if (ring && + ((ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_GFX) || + (ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_COMPUTE))) { + u32 reg = SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmRLC_SPM_MC_CNTL); + u32 data = (vmid & RLC_SPM_MC_CNTL__RLC_SPM_VMID_MASK) << RLC_SPM_MC_CNTL__RLC_SPM_VMID__SHIFT; + amdgpu_ring_emit_wreg(ring, reg, data); + return; + } + amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl(adev, false); gfx_v9_0_update_spm_vmid_internal(adev, vmid); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_4_3.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_4_3.c index da031caa4e9e6..30c8b751849cd 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_4_3.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_4_3.c @@ -1397,7 +1397,7 @@ static int gfx_v9_4_3_rlc_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev) { /* init spm vmid with 0xf */ if (adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->update_spm_vmid) - adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->update_spm_vmid(adev, 0, adev->vm_manager.spm_vmid); + adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->update_spm_vmid(adev, 0, NULL, adev->vm_manager.spm_vmid); return 0; } @@ -1609,7 +1609,7 @@ static int gfx_v9_4_3_rlc_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev) } static void gfx_v9_4_3_update_spm_vmid(struct amdgpu_device *adev, - int inst, unsigned int vmid) + int inst, struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned int vmid) { u32 reg, pre_data, data; -- 2.56.0 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/amdgpu: bring back the ring parameter for update_spm_vmid() 2026-11-13 15:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/amdgpu: bring back the ring parameter for update_spm_vmid() Alex Deucher @ 2026-11-13 16:15 ` sashiko-bot 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-11-13 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alex Deucher, amd-gfx Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issues to consider: - [High] drm/amdgpu: update_spm_vmid() runs MMIO on every IB on GFX7/8/9.4.3/12.1 - [Medium] drm/amdgpu: missing update_spm_vmid() dwords in GFX9/10/12 emit_frame_size -- commit ffe1064b12164c8a48cc5a74a5943685b8d92ee1 Author: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> drm/amdgpu: bring back the ring parameter for update_spm_vmid() This commit restores the ring parameter to update_spm_vmid() and calls it from amdgpu_ib_schedule() on GFX and compute rings so chips with GFXOFF emit the SPM VMID update via the ring instead of MMIO. > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c > index f98a7c6797b3c..ae028eeacaed7 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c > @@ -121,6 +121,10 @@ int amdgpu_ib_schedule(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, struct amdgpu_job *job, > struct dma_fence **f) > { > struct amdgpu_device *adev = ring->adev; > + bool emit_spm_needed = adev->gfx.rlc.funcs && > + adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->update_spm_vmid && > + (ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_COMPUTE || > + ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_GFX); > struct amdgpu_ib *ib; > struct dma_fence *tmp = NULL; > struct amdgpu_fence *af; > @@ -209,6 +213,10 @@ int amdgpu_ib_schedule(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, struct amdgpu_job *job, > if (need_pipe_sync) > amdgpu_ring_emit_pipeline_sync(ring); > > + if (emit_spm_needed) > + adev->gfx.rlc.funcs->update_spm_vmid(adev, ring->xcc_id, ring, > + adev->vm_manager.spm_vmid); > + > if (emit_gds_needed) > amdgpu_ring_emit_gds_switch(ring, job->vmid, job->gds_base, > job->gds_size, job->gws_base, [ ... ] > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c > index 7683e8a0a4380..9d58af0c678c8 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c > @@ -8187,8 +8187,17 @@ static void gfx_v10_0_update_spm_vmid_internal(struct amdgpu_device *adev, > } > > static void gfx_v10_0_update_spm_vmid(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int xcc_id, > - unsigned int vmid) > -{ > + struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned int vmid) > +{ > + if (ring && > + ((ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_GFX) || > + (ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_COMPUTE))) { > + u32 reg = SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmRLC_SPM_MC_CNTL); > + u32 data = (vmid & RLC_SPM_MC_CNTL__RLC_SPM_VMID_MASK) << RLC_SPM_MC_CNTL__RLC_SPM_VMID__SHIFT; > + amdgpu_ring_emit_wreg(ring, reg, data); > + return; > + } > + > amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl(adev, false); > > gfx_v10_0_update_spm_vmid_internal(adev, vmid); [ ... ] > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c > index df2fb09bbcd86..b01e239db195f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_0.c [ ... ] > @@ -3978,12 +3979,22 @@ static void gfx_v12_0_update_perf_clk(struct amdgpu_device *adev, > > static void gfx_v12_0_update_spm_vmid(struct amdgpu_device *adev, > int xcc_id, > + struct amdgpu_ring *ring, > unsigned vmid) > { > u32 reg, data; > > - amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl(adev, false); > reg = SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, regRLC_SPM_MC_CNTL); > + > + if (ring && > + ((ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_GFX) || > + (ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_COMPUTE))) { > + data = (vmid & RLC_SPM_MC_CNTL__RLC_SPM_VMID_MASK) << RLC_SPM_MC_CNTL__RLC_SPM_VMID__SHIFT; > + amdgpu_ring_emit_wreg(ring, reg, data); > + return; > + } > + > + amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl(adev, false); > if (amdgpu_sriov_is_pp_one_vf(adev)) > data = RREG32_NO_KIQ(reg); > else > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_1.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_1.c > index 1f57d0fa2c044..bf69d71e6b065 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_1.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v12_1.c [ ... ] > @@ -2945,7 +2945,8 @@ static void gfx_v12_1_update_perf_clk(struct amdgpu_device *adev, > > static void gfx_v12_1_update_spm_vmid(struct amdgpu_device *adev, > int xcc_id, > - unsigned int vmid) > + struct amdgpu_ring *ring, > + unsigned vmid) > { > u32 reg, data; > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v7_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v7_0.c > index 72c84b61fda16..43dea0810137b 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v7_0.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v7_0.c [ ... ] > @@ -3483,7 +3483,7 @@ static int gfx_v7_0_rlc_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev) > } > > static void gfx_v7_0_update_spm_vmid(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int xcc_id, > - unsigned int vmid) > + struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned vmid) > { > u32 data; > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c > index 4666aa5b38c75..360a958f7577d 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c [ ... ] > @@ -5484,7 +5484,7 @@ static void gfx_v8_0_unset_safe_mode(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int xcc_id) > } > > static void gfx_v8_0_update_spm_vmid(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int xcc_id, > - unsigned int vmid) > + struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned vmid) > { > u32 data; > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c > index 2e2673a6dbbf5..7d001d7e3a0d0 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c > @@ -5227,8 +5227,17 @@ static void gfx_v9_0_update_spm_vmid_internal(struct amdgpu_device *adev, > } > > static void gfx_v9_0_update_spm_vmid(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int xcc_id, > - unsigned int vmid) > -{ > + struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned int vmid) > +{ > + if (ring && > + ((ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_GFX) || > + (ring->funcs->type == AMDGPU_RING_TYPE_COMPUTE))) { > + u32 reg = SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmRLC_SPM_MC_CNTL); > + u32 data = (vmid & RLC_SPM_MC_CNTL__RLC_SPM_VMID_MASK) << RLC_SPM_MC_CNTL__RLC_SPM_VMID__SHIFT; > + amdgpu_ring_emit_wreg(ring, reg, data); > + return; > + } > + > amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl(adev, false); > > gfx_v9_0_update_spm_vmid_internal(adev, vmid); [Severity: Medium] Do gfx_v9_0, gfx_v10_0, and gfx_v12_0 need 5 additional DWords in .emit_frame_size for the new amdgpu_ring_emit_wreg() call in update_spm_vmid()? While gfx_v11_0_ring_funcs_gfx and gfx_v11_0_ring_funcs_compute already include 5 DWords for update_spm_vmid in .emit_frame_size, that accounting is missing from gfx_v9_0_ring_funcs_gfx, gfx_v9_0_sw_ring_funcs_gfx, gfx_v9_0_ring_funcs_compute, gfx_v10_0_ring_funcs_gfx, gfx_v10_0_ring_funcs_compute, gfx_v12_0_ring_funcs_gfx, and gfx_v12_0_ring_funcs_compute. When a submission emits the full frame and alloc_size lands within 4 DWords below a 256-DWord alignment boundary (for example, 15 IBs on gfx_v10_0_ring_funcs_gfx gives 196 + 60 = 256 DWords), emitting 261 DWords underflows ring->count_dw in amdgpu_ring_commit(), logging an error and padding with NOPs into the next unallocated 256-DWord block. On gfx_v9_0_ring_funcs_compute, 125 IBs also pushes the total from 1020 to 1025 DWords, exceeding the 1024-DWord max_dw passed to amdgpu_ring_init(). > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_4_3.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_4_3.c > index da031caa4e9e6..30c8b751849cd 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_4_3.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_4_3.c [ ... ] > @@ -1609,7 +1609,7 @@ static int gfx_v9_4_3_rlc_resume(struct amdgpu_device *adev) > } > > static void gfx_v9_4_3_update_spm_vmid(struct amdgpu_device *adev, > - int inst, unsigned int vmid) > + int inst, struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned int vmid) > { > u32 reg, pre_data, data; [Severity: High] Should gfx_v7_0_update_spm_vmid(), gfx_v8_0_update_spm_vmid(), gfx_v9_4_3_update_spm_vmid(), and gfx_v12_1_update_spm_vmid() return early when ring is non-NULL? Because amdgpu_ib_schedule() now calls update_spm_vmid() on every GFX and compute IB submission whenever the callback is present, and these four implementations ignore the ring parameter, they run synchronous MMIO on every IB submission. On GFX7 and GFX8, every submission calls amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl(), RREG32(), and WREG32(); on GFX9.4.3, every compute submission runs RREG32() (which dispatches and polls KIQ under SR-IOV runtime); and on GFX12.1 when kernel compute queues are enabled via amdgpu_user_queue=0, concurrent per-ring scheduler threads perform unserialized RREG32() and WREG32_SOC15() read-modify-writes without disengaging GFXOFF. -- Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261113154954.1865439-1-alexander.deucher@amd.com?part=3 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] Revert "drm/amdgpu: re-enable SPM updates in the the IB path" 2026-11-13 15:49 [PATCH 1/3] Revert "drm/amdgpu: re-enable SPM updates in the the IB path" Alex Deucher 2026-11-13 15:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] Revert "drm/amdgpu: reemit RLC SPM register in ring reemit" Alex Deucher 2026-11-13 15:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/amdgpu: bring back the ring parameter for update_spm_vmid() Alex Deucher @ 2026-11-13 15:58 ` sashiko-bot 2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: sashiko-bot @ 2026-11-13 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alex Deucher, amd-gfx Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue to consider: - [Low] drm/amdgpu: missing Fixes: trailer for reverted commit d44428868e5b -- commit 12b1b21ab2f5553c0093b8415a98c46d2dc21fed Author: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> > Revert "drm/amdgpu: re-enable SPM updates in the the IB path" > > This reverts commit d44428868e5b9f97c6216eee1b4f82aec7a6e8d2. > > This causes flakiness in gfx11 CI tests. Revert. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> [Severity: Low] Should this revert include a Fixes: tag for the commit it reverts? Fixes: d44428868e5b ("drm/amdgpu: re-enable SPM updates in the the IB path") -- Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261113154954.1865439-1-alexander.deucher@amd.com?part=1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-13 16:15 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-11-13 15:49 [PATCH 1/3] Revert "drm/amdgpu: re-enable SPM updates in the the IB path" Alex Deucher 2026-11-13 15:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] Revert "drm/amdgpu: reemit RLC SPM register in ring reemit" Alex Deucher 2026-11-13 15:55 ` sashiko-bot 2026-11-13 15:49 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/amdgpu: bring back the ring parameter for update_spm_vmid() Alex Deucher 2026-11-13 16:15 ` sashiko-bot 2026-11-13 15:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] Revert "drm/amdgpu: re-enable SPM updates in the the IB path" sashiko-bot
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.