From: tip-bot for Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
gorcunov@openvz.org, peterz@infradead.org, fweisbec@gmail.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, ming.m.lin@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@elte.hu
Subject: [tip:perf/core] x86, perf: P4 PMU -- protect sensible procedures from preemption
Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 16:09:58 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-137351e0feeb9f25d99488ee1afc1c79f5499a9a@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100508112716.963478928@openvz.org>
Commit-ID: 137351e0feeb9f25d99488ee1afc1c79f5499a9a
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/137351e0feeb9f25d99488ee1afc1c79f5499a9a
Author: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
AuthorDate: Sat, 8 May 2010 15:25:52 +0400
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Sat, 8 May 2010 14:17:53 +0200
x86, perf: P4 PMU -- protect sensible procedures from preemption
Steven reported:
|
| I'm getting:
|
| Pid: 3477, comm: perf Not tainted 2.6.34-rc6 #2727
| Call Trace:
| [<ffffffff811c7565>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xd5/0xf0
| [<ffffffff81019874>] p4_hw_config+0x2b/0x15c
| [<ffffffff8107acbc>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x12b/0x14f
| [<ffffffff81019143>] hw_perf_event_init+0x468/0x7be
| [<ffffffff810782fd>] ? debug_mutex_init+0x31/0x3c
| [<ffffffff810c68b2>] T.850+0x273/0x42e
| [<ffffffff810c6cab>] sys_perf_event_open+0x23e/0x3f1
| [<ffffffff81009e6a>] ? sysret_check+0x2e/0x69
| [<ffffffff81009e32>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
|
| When running perf record in latest tip/perf/core
|
Due to the fact that p4 counters are shared between HT threads
we synthetically divide the whole set of counters into two
non-intersected subsets. And while we're "borrowing" counters
from these subsets we should not be preempted (well, strictly
speaking in p4_hw_config we just pre-set reference to the
subset which allow to save some cycles in schedule routine
if it happens on the same cpu). So use get_cpu/put_cpu pair.
Also p4_pmu_schedule_events should use smp_processor_id rather
than raw_ version. This allow us to catch up preemption issue
(if there will ever be).
Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Tested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
LKML-Reference: <20100508112716.963478928@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c | 8 ++++++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c
index b1f532d..ca40180 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c
@@ -421,7 +421,8 @@ static u64 p4_pmu_event_map(int hw_event)
static int p4_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
{
- int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
+ int cpu = get_cpu();
+ int rc = 0;
u32 escr, cccr;
/*
@@ -454,7 +455,10 @@ static int p4_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
p4_config_pack_cccr(P4_CCCR_MASK_HT));
}
- return x86_setup_perfctr(event);
+ rc = x86_setup_perfctr(event);
+ put_cpu();
+
+ return rc;
}
static inline void p4_pmu_clear_cccr_ovf(struct hw_perf_event *hwc)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-08 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-08 11:25 [patch 0/4] perf,p4 series for -tip Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-05-08 11:25 ` [patch 1/4] x86,perf: P4 PMU -- configurate predefined events Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-05-08 11:33 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-05-10 12:43 ` Robert Richter
2010-05-08 11:25 ` [patch 2/4] x86,perf: P4 PMU -- protect sensible procedures from preemption Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-05-08 16:09 ` tip-bot for Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2010-05-08 11:25 ` [patch 3/4] x86,perf: P4 PMU -- Get rid of redundant check for array index Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-05-08 16:10 ` [tip:perf/core] x86, perf: " tip-bot for Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-05-08 11:25 ` [patch 4/4] x86,perf: P4 PMU -- check for proper event index in RAW events Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-05-08 16:10 ` [tip:perf/core] x86, perf: " tip-bot for Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tip-137351e0feeb9f25d99488ee1afc1c79f5499a9a@git.kernel.org \
--to=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.