All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] objtool: Support unoptimized frame pointer setup
@ 2017-09-27 15:36 Josh Poimboeuf
  2017-09-28  5:31 ` [tip:core/urgent] " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Josh Poimboeuf @ 2017-09-27 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Arnd Bergmann, linux-kernel

Arnd Bergmann reported a bunch of warnings like:

  crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_fold_time()+0x3b: call without frame pointer save/setup
  crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_stuck()+0x1d: call without frame pointer save/setup
  crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_unbiased_bit()+0x15: call without frame pointer save/setup
  crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_read_entropy()+0x32: call without frame pointer save/setup
  crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_entropy_collector_free()+0x19: call without frame pointer save/setup

and

  arch/x86/events/core.o: warning: objtool: collect_events uses BP as a scratch register
  arch/x86/events/core.o: warning: objtool: events_ht_sysfs_show()+0x22: call without frame pointer save/setup

With certain rare configurations, GCC sometimes sets up the frame
pointer with:

  lea    (%rsp),%rbp

instead of:

  mov    %rsp,%rbp

The instructions are equivalent, so treat the former like the latter.

Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
---
 tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c | 11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
index 0e8c8ec4fd4e..97a1fdb3db63 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
@@ -284,11 +284,16 @@ int arch_decode_instruction(struct elf *elf, struct section *sec,
 	case 0x8d:
 		if (sib == 0x24 && rex_w && !rex_b && !rex_x) {
 
-			/* lea disp(%rsp), reg */
 			*type = INSN_STACK;
-			op->src.type = OP_SRC_ADD;
+			if (!insn.displacement.value) {
+				/* lea (%rsp), reg */
+				op->src.type = OP_SRC_REG;
+			} else {
+				/* lea disp(%rsp), reg */
+				op->src.type = OP_SRC_ADD;
+				op->src.offset = insn.displacement.value;
+			}
 			op->src.reg = CFI_SP;
-			op->src.offset = insn.displacement.value;
 			op->dest.type = OP_DEST_REG;
 			op->dest.reg = op_to_cfi_reg[modrm_reg][rex_r];
 
-- 
2.13.5

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [tip:core/urgent] objtool: Support unoptimized frame pointer setup
  2017-09-27 15:36 [PATCH] objtool: Support unoptimized frame pointer setup Josh Poimboeuf
@ 2017-09-28  5:31 ` tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf @ 2017-09-28  5:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: mingo, linux-kernel, hpa, jpoimboe, torvalds, peterz, arnd, tglx

Commit-ID:  607a4029d439cdfa258aff5da32bb9cd6ed1a66d
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/607a4029d439cdfa258aff5da32bb9cd6ed1a66d
Author:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:36:38 -0500
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 07:25:54 +0200

objtool: Support unoptimized frame pointer setup

Arnd Bergmann reported a bunch of warnings like:

  crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_fold_time()+0x3b: call without frame pointer save/setup
  crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_stuck()+0x1d: call without frame pointer save/setup
  crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_unbiased_bit()+0x15: call without frame pointer save/setup
  crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_read_entropy()+0x32: call without frame pointer save/setup
  crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_entropy_collector_free()+0x19: call without frame pointer save/setup

and

  arch/x86/events/core.o: warning: objtool: collect_events uses BP as a scratch register
  arch/x86/events/core.o: warning: objtool: events_ht_sysfs_show()+0x22: call without frame pointer save/setup

With certain rare configurations, GCC sometimes sets up the frame
pointer with:

  lea    (%rsp),%rbp

instead of:

  mov    %rsp,%rbp

The instructions are equivalent, so treat the former like the latter.

Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/a468af8b28a69b83fffc6d7668be9b6fcc873699.1506526584.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c | 11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
index 0f22768..34a579f 100644
--- a/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/arch/x86/decode.c
@@ -284,11 +284,16 @@ int arch_decode_instruction(struct elf *elf, struct section *sec,
 	case 0x8d:
 		if (sib == 0x24 && rex_w && !rex_b && !rex_x) {
 
-			/* lea disp(%rsp), reg */
 			*type = INSN_STACK;
-			op->src.type = OP_SRC_ADD;
+			if (!insn.displacement.value) {
+				/* lea (%rsp), reg */
+				op->src.type = OP_SRC_REG;
+			} else {
+				/* lea disp(%rsp), reg */
+				op->src.type = OP_SRC_ADD;
+				op->src.offset = insn.displacement.value;
+			}
 			op->src.reg = CFI_SP;
-			op->src.offset = insn.displacement.value;
 			op->dest.type = OP_DEST_REG;
 			op->dest.reg = op_to_cfi_reg[modrm_reg][rex_r];
 

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-09-28  5:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-09-27 15:36 [PATCH] objtool: Support unoptimized frame pointer setup Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-28  5:31 ` [tip:core/urgent] " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.