* [PATCH] locking/static_keys: avoid nested functions
@ 2016-02-08 14:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2016-02-08 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
clang does not support nested functions inside of an array definition:
lib/test_static_keys.c:105:16: error: function definition is not allowed here
.test_key = test_key_func(&old_true_key, static_key_true),
lib/test_static_keys.c:50:20: note: expanded from macro 'test_key_func'
({bool func(void) { return branch(key); } func; })
That code appears to have been a little too clever, so this
simplifies it a bit by defining functions outside of the array.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
lib/test_static_keys.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_static_keys.c b/lib/test_static_keys.c
index c61b299e367f..915d75df2086 100644
--- a/lib/test_static_keys.c
+++ b/lib/test_static_keys.c
@@ -46,8 +46,11 @@ struct test_key {
bool (*test_key)(void);
};
-#define test_key_func(key, branch) \
- ({bool func(void) { return branch(key); } func; })
+#define test_key_func(key, branch) \
+static bool key ## _ ## branch(void) \
+{ \
+ return branch(&key); \
+}
static void invert_key(struct static_key *key)
{
@@ -92,6 +95,25 @@ static int verify_keys(struct test_key *keys, int size, bool invert)
return 0;
}
+test_key_func(old_true_key, static_key_true)
+test_key_func(old_false_key, static_key_false)
+test_key_func(true_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(true_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(false_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(false_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_old_true_key, static_key_true)
+test_key_func(base_inv_old_true_key, static_key_true)
+test_key_func(base_old_false_key, static_key_false)
+test_key_func(base_inv_old_false_key, static_key_false)
+test_key_func(base_true_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_true_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_true_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_true_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_false_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_false_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_false_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_false_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+
static int __init test_static_key_init(void)
{
int ret;
@@ -102,95 +124,95 @@ static int __init test_static_key_init(void)
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &old_true_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&old_true_key, static_key_true),
+ .test_key = &old_true_key_static_key_true,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &old_false_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&old_false_key, static_key_false),
+ .test_key = &old_false_key_static_key_false,
},
/* internal keys - new keys */
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&true_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &true_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&true_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &true_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&false_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &false_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&false_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &false_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
/* external keys - old keys */
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_old_true_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_old_true_key, static_key_true),
+ .test_key = &base_old_true_key_static_key_true,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_inv_old_true_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_old_true_key, static_key_true),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_old_true_key_static_key_true,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_old_false_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_old_false_key, static_key_false),
+ .test_key = &base_old_false_key_static_key_false,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_inv_old_false_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_old_false_key, static_key_false),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_old_false_key_static_key_false,
},
/* external keys - new keys */
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_true_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_true_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_true_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_true_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_inv_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_true_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_true_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_inv_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_true_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_true_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_false_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_false_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_false_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_false_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_inv_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_false_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_false_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_inv_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_false_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_false_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
};
--
2.7.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH] locking/static_keys: avoid nested functions
@ 2016-02-08 14:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2016-02-08 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Arnd Bergmann, Jason Baron,
Peter Zijlstra (Intel), linux-kernel
clang does not support nested functions inside of an array definition:
lib/test_static_keys.c:105:16: error: function definition is not allowed here
.test_key = test_key_func(&old_true_key, static_key_true),
lib/test_static_keys.c:50:20: note: expanded from macro 'test_key_func'
({bool func(void) { return branch(key); } func; })
That code appears to have been a little too clever, so this
simplifies it a bit by defining functions outside of the array.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
lib/test_static_keys.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_static_keys.c b/lib/test_static_keys.c
index c61b299e367f..915d75df2086 100644
--- a/lib/test_static_keys.c
+++ b/lib/test_static_keys.c
@@ -46,8 +46,11 @@ struct test_key {
bool (*test_key)(void);
};
-#define test_key_func(key, branch) \
- ({bool func(void) { return branch(key); } func; })
+#define test_key_func(key, branch) \
+static bool key ## _ ## branch(void) \
+{ \
+ return branch(&key); \
+}
static void invert_key(struct static_key *key)
{
@@ -92,6 +95,25 @@ static int verify_keys(struct test_key *keys, int size, bool invert)
return 0;
}
+test_key_func(old_true_key, static_key_true)
+test_key_func(old_false_key, static_key_false)
+test_key_func(true_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(true_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(false_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(false_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_old_true_key, static_key_true)
+test_key_func(base_inv_old_true_key, static_key_true)
+test_key_func(base_old_false_key, static_key_false)
+test_key_func(base_inv_old_false_key, static_key_false)
+test_key_func(base_true_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_true_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_true_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_true_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_false_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_false_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_false_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_false_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+
static int __init test_static_key_init(void)
{
int ret;
@@ -102,95 +124,95 @@ static int __init test_static_key_init(void)
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &old_true_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&old_true_key, static_key_true),
+ .test_key = &old_true_key_static_key_true,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &old_false_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&old_false_key, static_key_false),
+ .test_key = &old_false_key_static_key_false,
},
/* internal keys - new keys */
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&true_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &true_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&true_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &true_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&false_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &false_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&false_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &false_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
/* external keys - old keys */
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_old_true_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_old_true_key, static_key_true),
+ .test_key = &base_old_true_key_static_key_true,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_inv_old_true_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_old_true_key, static_key_true),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_old_true_key_static_key_true,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_old_false_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_old_false_key, static_key_false),
+ .test_key = &base_old_false_key_static_key_false,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_inv_old_false_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_old_false_key, static_key_false),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_old_false_key_static_key_false,
},
/* external keys - new keys */
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_true_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_true_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_true_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_true_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_inv_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_true_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_true_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_inv_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_true_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_true_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_false_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_false_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_false_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_false_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_inv_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_false_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_false_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_inv_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_false_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_false_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
};
--
2.7.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [PATCH] locking/static_keys: avoid nested functions
2016-02-08 14:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2016-02-08 19:09 ` Jason Baron
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jason Baron @ 2016-02-08 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 02/08/2016 09:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> clang does not support nested functions inside of an array definition:
>
> lib/test_static_keys.c:105:16: error: function definition is not allowed here
> .test_key = test_key_func(&old_true_key, static_key_true),
> lib/test_static_keys.c:50:20: note: expanded from macro 'test_key_func'
> ({bool func(void) { return branch(key); } func; })
>
> That code appears to have been a little too clever, so this
> simplifies it a bit by defining functions outside of the array.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> lib/test_static_keys.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
Works for me.
Acked-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Thanks,
-Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] locking/static_keys: avoid nested functions
@ 2016-02-08 19:09 ` Jason Baron
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jason Baron @ 2016-02-08 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann, Ingo Molnar
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, Peter Zijlstra (Intel), linux-kernel
On 02/08/2016 09:36 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> clang does not support nested functions inside of an array definition:
>
> lib/test_static_keys.c:105:16: error: function definition is not allowed here
> .test_key = test_key_func(&old_true_key, static_key_true),
> lib/test_static_keys.c:50:20: note: expanded from macro 'test_key_func'
> ({bool func(void) { return branch(key); } func; })
>
> That code appears to have been a little too clever, so this
> simplifies it a bit by defining functions outside of the array.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> lib/test_static_keys.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
Works for me.
Acked-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Thanks,
-Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [tip:locking/core] locking/static_keys: Avoid nested functions
2016-02-08 14:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
(?)
(?)
@ 2016-02-09 12:19 ` tip-bot for Arnd Bergmann
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Arnd Bergmann @ 2016-02-09 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: peterz, hpa, mingo, torvalds, linux-kernel, arnd, tglx, jbaron
Commit-ID: 975db45e9cc561bf8a7eddfa0705d3a078ec184f
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/975db45e9cc561bf8a7eddfa0705d3a078ec184f
Author: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
AuthorDate: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:36:52 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 10:27:29 +0100
locking/static_keys: Avoid nested functions
clang does not support nested functions inside of an array definition:
lib/test_static_keys.c:105:16: error: function definition is not allowed here
.test_key = test_key_func(&old_true_key, static_key_true),
lib/test_static_keys.c:50:20: note: expanded from macro 'test_key_func'
({bool func(void) { return branch(key); } func; })
That code appears to be a little too clever, so this simplifies it
a bit by defining functions outside of the array.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1454942223-2781480-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
lib/test_static_keys.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/test_static_keys.c b/lib/test_static_keys.c
index c61b299..915d75d 100644
--- a/lib/test_static_keys.c
+++ b/lib/test_static_keys.c
@@ -46,8 +46,11 @@ struct test_key {
bool (*test_key)(void);
};
-#define test_key_func(key, branch) \
- ({bool func(void) { return branch(key); } func; })
+#define test_key_func(key, branch) \
+static bool key ## _ ## branch(void) \
+{ \
+ return branch(&key); \
+}
static void invert_key(struct static_key *key)
{
@@ -92,6 +95,25 @@ static int verify_keys(struct test_key *keys, int size, bool invert)
return 0;
}
+test_key_func(old_true_key, static_key_true)
+test_key_func(old_false_key, static_key_false)
+test_key_func(true_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(true_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(false_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(false_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_old_true_key, static_key_true)
+test_key_func(base_inv_old_true_key, static_key_true)
+test_key_func(base_old_false_key, static_key_false)
+test_key_func(base_inv_old_false_key, static_key_false)
+test_key_func(base_true_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_true_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_true_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_true_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_false_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_false_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_false_key, static_branch_likely)
+test_key_func(base_inv_false_key, static_branch_unlikely)
+
static int __init test_static_key_init(void)
{
int ret;
@@ -102,95 +124,95 @@ static int __init test_static_key_init(void)
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &old_true_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&old_true_key, static_key_true),
+ .test_key = &old_true_key_static_key_true,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &old_false_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&old_false_key, static_key_false),
+ .test_key = &old_false_key_static_key_false,
},
/* internal keys - new keys */
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&true_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &true_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&true_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &true_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&false_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &false_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&false_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &false_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
/* external keys - old keys */
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_old_true_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_old_true_key, static_key_true),
+ .test_key = &base_old_true_key_static_key_true,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_inv_old_true_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_old_true_key, static_key_true),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_old_true_key_static_key_true,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_old_false_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_old_false_key, static_key_false),
+ .test_key = &base_old_false_key_static_key_false,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_inv_old_false_key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_old_false_key, static_key_false),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_old_false_key_static_key_false,
},
/* external keys - new keys */
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_true_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_true_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_true_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_true_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_inv_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_true_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_true_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_inv_true_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_true_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_true_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_false_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_false_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = false,
.key = &base_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_false_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_false_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_inv_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_false_key, static_branch_likely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_false_key_static_branch_likely,
},
{
.init_state = true,
.key = &base_inv_false_key.key,
- .test_key = test_key_func(&base_inv_false_key, static_branch_unlikely),
+ .test_key = &base_inv_false_key_static_branch_unlikely,
},
};
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-09 12:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-02-08 14:36 [PATCH] locking/static_keys: avoid nested functions Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-08 14:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-08 19:09 ` Jason Baron
2016-02-08 19:09 ` Jason Baron
2016-02-09 12:19 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/static_keys: Avoid " tip-bot for Arnd Bergmann
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.